Paul L. Caron
Dean





Tuesday, October 8, 2024

NYU Dean: Medical School Accreditation Is Outdated (What About Law School Accreditation?)

Wall Street Journal Op-Ed:  Med-School Accreditation Is Outdated, by Robert I. Grossman (CEO, NYU Langone Health; Dean, NYU Grossman School of Medicine; Steven B. Abramson (Executive Vice President, NYU Langone Health; Vice-Dean, NYU Grossman School of Medicine):

LCMEMedical education in the U.S. has evolved over the past century, but the way we evaluate and accredit medical schools has failed to keep pace.

Before World War II, medical schools operated by their own standards, with no unified framework to ensure consistent, efficient and high-quality education. In 1942 the American Medical Association and the Association of American Medical Colleges, which had separately accredited medical schools, met to address this problem and formed the Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Since 1965 the U.S. government has recognized the LCME as the accreditation agency for medical schools, giving the group significant power to shape how we teach physicians.

When it was established, the LCME based many of its standards on the landmark Flexner Report, an assessment of medical education written in 1910. Today, the LCME’s system for evaluating medical schools and academic medical centers is outdated, expensive and misguided.

It isn’t aligned with how medicine is practiced today. Medical schools work to keep their curriculum up to date, adapting to the pace of scientific discovery and the evolving needs of patients. While the accreditation process is intended to ensure quality across the nation’s 159 medical schools, it has become burdensome, diverting resources and attention from training future physicians.

It’s time for the LCME and its governance process to move into the 21st century. It currently evaluates medical-school programs against 12 standards during a site visit by five LCME members over three days. Medical schools typically spend 18 months preparing for the site visit, assembling a several-hundred-page document—known as the Data Collection Instrument—to show compliance with those 12 standards. The ever-changing standards of the LCME bloat medical-school administrations, divert resources from students, and consume the time of faculty and staff. Schools receive no specific guidance from the LCME on how to meet the standards, and the standards themselves are inconsistent. What one examiner finds satisfactory, another may view as inadequate.

Introducing any innovation that the LCME might view as counter to the standards is risky. Instead, schools devote thousands of hours of faculty and administrator time to site-visit preparation. To minimize the risks associated with such a capricious review process, institutions routinely hire consultants (who are often current or former LCME members) at significant cost to have a chance at accreditation. In preparing for NYU Langone Health’s most recent LCME site visit in 2023, we spent $30,000 for an initial consultant. Because the LCME granted our institution an accreditation “with warning,” we then spent $250,000 on a second round of consultants. ...

The LCME had a noble original mission, but after 80 years it must overhaul its approach to meet the reality of education and medicine in the 21st century. We urge the LCME to implement these recommendations to improve medical education and benefit patients. If the LCME, AMA and AAMC can’t fulfill their obligation, Congress should intervene.

Editor's Note:  If you would like to receive a daily email with links to legal education posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here.

https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2024/10/nyu-dean-medical-school-accreditation-is-outdated-what-about-law-school-accreditation.html

Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink