Paul L. Caron
Dean





Sunday, October 13, 2024

NY Times Op-Ed: Pope Francis Is Turning Certainty On Its Head

New York Times Op-Ed:  Pope Francis Is Turning Certainty on Its Head, by David French (Author, Divided We Fall: America’s Secession Threat and How to Restore Our Nation (2020)):

French (2024)Pope Francis made two comments last week that touched off a tempest in Christendom.

First, during an interreligious meeting at Catholic Junior College in Singapore, he said that religions are “like different languages in order to arrive at God, but God is God for all. And if God is God for all, then we are all sons and daughters of God.”

The idea that we are sons and daughters of God is basic Christian doctrine. He is the creator, and we are his creation. But the pope’s statements go farther than simply recognizing God’s sovereignty. He indicated that other faiths can reach God as well. “But,” he continued, “‘my God is more important than your God!’ Is that true? There’s only one God, and each of us has a language, so to speak, in order to arrive at God.”

Then, in a news conference on his flight home, he addressed the American presidential election and criticized both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. “Both are against life,” the pope said, Harris because of her stance on abortion and Trump because of his stance on immigration. Pope Francis would not choose between them. Instead, he said, “Which is the lesser evil? That lady or that gentleman? I don’t know. Each person must think and decide according to his or her own conscience.”

The backlash to both these ideas was immediate. Critics accused the pope of being “counter-scriptural.” The archbishop emeritus of Philadelphia, Charles Chaput wrote, “To suggest, even loosely, that Catholics walk a more or less similar path to God as other religions drains martyrdom of its meaning. Why give up your life for Christ when other paths may get us to the same God?” Partisans on both sides were incredulous at the pope’s application of Catholic doctrine and infuriated that he deferred to voters’ individual consciences.

I have a different perspective. Pope Francis wasn’t watering down the Christian faith; he was expressing existential humility. He was unwilling to state, definitively, the mind of God and to pass judgment on the souls of others. His words were surprising not because they were heretical in any way, but rather because existential humility contradicts the fundamentalist spirit of much of contemporary American Christianity. His words were less a declaration of truth than an invitation to introspection, a call to examine your conscience.

Consider the contrast between the pope’s reluctance to consign believers in other faiths to hell (much less his willingness to embrace the idea that non-Christians can “arrive at God”) or to take sides in American politics with the willingness of many Christians to declare even fellow believers as lost forever if they hold different views on abortion or the 2024 election. ...

This division between certainty and humility isn’t simply a divide in Protestantism. It crosses over to Catholicism, to Orthodoxy, and to people of different faiths or no faith at all. I’ve encountered Catholics, atheists, Muslims and Hindus who express the same sense of absolute certainty that you’ll encounter in the most intolerant Presbyterian or Baptist. ...

[T]he necessity of humility is further amplified by one of Christ’s most famous commands: “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.” My own sense of certainty can harm me; it can lead to harsh judgments of others. ...

Religious orthodoxy is the product of several leaps of faith. As an evangelical Christian who believes in the inerrancy of Scripture, I’m not only making a leap to believe in God — or in Christ’s resurrection — but also that the Holy Spirit guided the church fathers who created the canon of Scripture.

We leap and we leap and we leap, but do we ever consider that we’re wrong? Do we see that other people are making different leaps and consider that God might be gracious to them as well? ...

There’s a key word that both Pope John Paul II and Pope Francis used: conscience. Francis tells American Catholics to vote as their conscience dictates. John Paul II sees the individual conscience as a route to knowing God. To respect a person’s conscience isn’t to show weakness or embrace moral relativism. It’s to recognize that God is at work in all human hearts and that existential humility doesn’t contradict religious conviction.

It is a vital aspect of the Christian faith.

Editor's Note:  If you would like to receive a weekly email each Sunday with links to the faith posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here.

Other op-eds by David French:

https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2024/10/ny-times-op-ed-pope-francis-is-turning-certainty-on-its-head.html

Faith, Legal Education | Permalink