Paul L. Caron
Dean





Wednesday, June 19, 2024

Columbia Smuggles Activism Into The Law

City Journal:  Columbia Smuggles Activism Into the Law, by Tal Fortgang (Manhattan Institute):

Columbia (2023)Hardly anyone reads law review articles, but those who do are among the most influential readers in the country. Supreme Court justices and federal and state judges rely on academic theories to decide important cases and to set the legal doctrines that shape American life. Professors shape their students’ worldviews by assigning articles appearing in prestigious journals to show that they are authoritative—the law equivalent of peer-reviewed. Though these journals are student-run and -edited, they often legitimize the ideas that become law and common knowledge.

It’s no small deal, then, when a distinguished law review compromises the procedures that help keep it trustworthy.

And it is a huge problem if that law review circumvents its usual procedures and drops its editorial standards to push shoddy legal scholarship with a clear—and bigoted—agenda. But if any institution knows how to set its own credibility ablaze, it’s Columbia University, the school that let itself be overrun with rule-flouting student radicals this spring, and whose flagship law review has followed suit. ...

The Columbia officials who ushered in this era of academically bankrupt and activist pseudo-scholarship are unlikely to do any soul-searching about their role in spreading falsehoods and shredding their institution’s credibility. But Americans, including judges and academics, should remain vigilant in insisting that not everything written under a prestigious name is worth the paper it’s printed on.

Paul Horwitz (Alabama), Hmmm….

Any present or former journalist, or anyone who has written an op-ed or essay for a general interest publication, knows that editors are keen on compelling openings that suggest to the reader the immense importance of the topic. ... It’s an understandable practice. But it carries with it tremendous temptations to exaggerate, mythologize, or pay implicit tribute to Harry Frankfurt. So we come to the first paragraph of this essay in the online spaces of the midbrow conservative “public intellectual” publication City Journal. I have to wonder: Does anyone really think that anything in this paragraph after the first six words is true? Does the author, a law school graduate, really think so? I just can't see how.

Prior TaxProf Blog coverage:

 

https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2024/06/columbia-smuggles-activism-into-the-law-.html

Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink