Paul L. Caron
Dean





Wednesday, January 20, 2021

Luke Reviews Field's M&A Termination Rights Triggered By Changes In Law

Jotwell (Tax) (2016)Charlene Luke (Florida), The Upside of Investigating Taxpayers' Approaches to the Downside Risks of Tax Law Change (reviewing Heather M. Field (UC-Hastings), Tax MACs: A Study of M&A Termination Rights Triggered by Material Adverse Changes in Law, 73 Tax Law. 823 (2020)):

Heather M. Field’s Tax MACs: A Study of M&A Termination Rights Triggered by Material Adverse Changes in Law presents information and insights about tax-specific material adverse change provisions in publicly filed mergers and acquisitions (M&A) agreements from May 2014–May 2019. Field identified and primarily focused on 13 agreements with “Tax MAC Out” provisions, meaning that these agreements provided an exit right that could be exercised unilaterally because of adverse tax law changes. Field also located 6 agreements that contained express Tax MAC provisions but that did not provide a unilateral ability to exit; most in this group were in the form of requiring the parties to work to address the tax change through restructuring, with termination expressly not following from an inability to complete such restructuring.

The article highlights the bespoke nature of Tax MAC provisions; while Field found that some boilerplate language recurred, there were also substantial differences among the agreements, and the article suggests explanations for the variability, tied to specific instances of difference. As Field notes, the heterogeneity suggests ample “opportunities for nuanced bargaining and value-added lawyering.” ...

The tax changes that worry taxpayers, as evidenced by these agreements, could suggest new approaches to anti-tax avoidance policies, standards, or rules (which also suggests a fourth audience: government actors charged with issuing guidance and enforcing tax law, a possibility Field touches on in her companion article). The variance among the agreements could prove useful in considering whether there is equitable access to understanding (and exploiting) the complexity inherent in the tax system.

Field’s method provides a useful roadmap for advancing tax research grounded in taxpayers’ revealed preferences. To be sure, Field is not the first to consult public filings in tax scholarship, but it is a reminder that there is a considerable opportunity to advance tax scholarship by using this approach.

https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2021/01/luke-reviews-fields-ma-termination-rights-triggered-by-changes-in-law.html

Scholarship, Tax, Tax Scholarship | Permalink