Paul L. Caron

Tuesday, December 8, 2020

University Of Colorado Dean: ‘Never Waste A Good Pandemic' — Replace 50 Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty With 25 Instructors Who Teach More And Earn Less

Inside Higher Ed, ‘Never Waste a Good Pandemic’:

Colorado (2020)The University of Colorado at Boulder’s College of Arts and Sciences dean said this week that he hopes to replace 50 tenured and tenure-track faculty members with 25 instructors who will teach more and earn less. His goal is to build more flexibility into the college’s post-COVID-19 budget.

The faculty positions are hypothetical and the numbers are just examples, James White, interim dean, said in an interview Thursday. About 60 professors are taking incentivized retirement as part of an effort to cut the college’s budget by 8 percent. No one is getting laid off. But going forward, White believes that employing relatively more non-tenure-track instructors means the college can provide midcareer and other support to the tenured professors it retains.

“Cutting is hard but growing back intelligently can be even harder,” White said. “Never waste a good pandemic.”

To many, White’s proposal read as an attack on tenure, shared governance and the notion of higher education as a public good.

James White (Interim Dean, University of Colorado), A Budget Update: The Road Ahead:

This year, the College of Arts and Sciences had to cut about 7.7% from its budget. Furloughs and temporary pay reductions accounted for 2.7%, and our portion of campus budget cuts was 4.8%. The rest we have planned to come from incentivized retirements of tenured and tenure-track faculty. I had three guiding principles in making this choice. The first was no layoffs; the second was no additional pay reductions; the third was our actions had to leave us poised to come out of this crisis stronger than we went into it. 

As I noted in July, our choices are very limited. We have an inflexible, brittle budget that can’t readily absorb even a relatively small cut. Here’s a rough scale of the problem: 

The campus incurred unexpected costs and revenue losses of about $69 million in the spring when we had to close the campus, and the 2021 fiscal year budget includes an additional ~$96.6 million revenue reduction (about 10.4%) from the previous year. The 2020 annual academic general fund for all colleges at CU Boulder is $342 million, and the College of Arts and Sciences spends about half of that, $170 million.

At the core is a critical fact: The college budget is primarily salaries. Tenured and tenure track faculty salaries are 49% of our budget; graduate student salaries and tuition remission accounts for 19% of budget, and instructor salaries compose 7% of budget. Staff salaries are 11%, so salaries plus tuition remission account for 86% of our spending. Operating expenses and pass-throughs to departments like DAICR and Academic Program Allocations (former fees) account for remaining 14%. 

The fact that our budget is mostly devoted to salaries means that when we must cut our spending, reducing salary costs is the only large lever we have to pull. As it happens, the pandemic hit at a time when the Baby Boom generation is retiring. About 30% of our tenured faculty are over the age of 65. To meet a 4.8% budget reduction, which is about $10 million (with benefits budget included), with retirements alone, about 60 tenure-track professors would need to volunteer to retire. We are nearing that goal today.

What would we do if we didn’t have this retirement lever? Our rigid budget doesn’t leave much option other than program elimination. If we faced a future funding shortfall similar to or larger than this year’s, we would need to take actions like eliminating about three medium-sized departments or disbanding the college and reforming it with fewer faculty from many units.

This is a lever of absolute last resort and is one we would pull only in the most-dire circumstances and only after consulting with the college’s faculty and staff.

Meanwhile, we are obliged to prepare for the future, to gain budget flexibility so that we are not forced to face such choices. To do this, we propose to rebalance the ratio of tenure-track faculty to instructors. Currently, that ratio, by head count, is 3.3:1 (TTT to instructors). Reducing tenure-track faculty by 50 and adding 25 instructors would yield a new ratio of 2.8:1. Accounting for related savings, making this move would free $6.2 million annually. 

What would we do with these savings? Rather than reinvesting in tenure-track positions, we should invest in more flexible ways than we now do. This would mean investing in more staff, infrastructure, better support for research and creative work, travel, an “excellent new ideas” fund, faculty retention and the like. With somewhat smaller ranks of tenured faculty, we would be able to better support the faculty, staff and students we have.

We must envision the College of Arts and Sciences of the future, five to 50 years from now. That college should better support its tenured faculty and teaching professors. It should also be nimbler—fiscally and programmatically—better able to withstand the inevitable economic downturns and better able to invest in great new ideas.

To a great extent, realizing this vision will require a culture change, a close examination of our values and a critical analysis of how we can best translate those values into action. It will require the discipline, knowledge and skill that we foster in a liberal-arts education.

On Dec. 15 at 4:30 p.m., I’ll hold a Zoom discussion on the budget. To join this meeting, please use this link.

The future starts now. We intend to emerge from the pandemic stronger and better positioned for the challenges ahead. And with your continued support and help, we will.

Update:  James White (Interim Dean, University of Colorado), Mea Culpa and an Invitation:

I believe in transparency. This is why I have apprised you of our fiscal challenges throughout this year. It’s why I asked all faculty and staff for your advice on how to cut the budget. And it’s why, on Wednesday, I sent a memo to all faculty and staff outlining how we have cut the budget and how, over the long haul, I propose to strengthen our fiscal resilience and our ability to give our students the highest-quality education we can.

My faith in transparency is why I write today. In an interview with a journalist this week, I made an ill-considered remark. In describing the need to be deliberative and thoughtful about how and where we cut, I said, “Never waste a good pandemic.”

That was flippant and insensitive. I apologize.

I should have stuck to my underlying point, which is this: In times of crisis, like the one we are in, we are duty-bound to cut spending in a way most likely to preserve the long-term health of the college and its educational mission and protect the long-term prospects of its students.

In my view, that means thinking critically about how we have been spending and whether those choices are sustainable. My proposal to rebalance the ratio of tenure-track to instructor-rank faculty is simply a proposal—not a fait accompli—that I will discuss with faculty. Such a move would be made only after consultation with faculty and staff generally and with our faculty-governance bodies specifically.

Tenured faculty are central to our research-intensive university. Tenured faculty broaden and deepen the scope of human knowledge and convey it to the next generation. Research and teaching are indeed two sides of the same coin.

Meanwhile, we aim to improve the pay and status of instructors, who are often among our most-talented and best-loved teachers. We created the Task Force on Instructor-rank Faculty to address these issues. And we remain committed to teaching excellence, as our recent Quality Teaching Initiative makes clear.

Inside Higher Ed, Colorado at Boulder Dean Offers Mea Culpa

Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink


A college degree is a union card to a job. Students who want jobs are fine with online, as long as commensurate cost reductions are associated with that online program.

The party school students might oppose on-line, but they are mostly unemployable anyway, so stripping them of the social aspects of college actually does them a favor. Now they won't waste six years and tens of thousands of dollars to become debt slaves. No party, no bill.

It's just a pity that the college doesn't cut admin jobs instead of professorial jobs. But, they're primarily in the business of sucking down federal dollars, so it's not really a surprise. "Education" is just the McGuffin they use to get the feds to pay their salaries through student proxies. Profs are like janitors - a dime a dozen.

Posted by: Steve K | Dec 9, 2020 10:57:03 AM

If the faculty losing jobs aren't in the engineering department they are probably spending all their time pushing woke propaganda anyway, so no great loss in terms of actual teaching/research is anticipated.

Posted by: David Longfellow | Dec 9, 2020 10:01:07 AM

The professoriate has done much to undermine the public value of higher education, and the proliferation of useless administrators are a cancer upon the body academic. I predict a significant "culling of the herd" over the next decade. We shall see whether the survivors make the reforms necessary to be considered worthy of public funding.

Posted by: Hominem Humilem | Dec 9, 2020 9:28:20 AM

Boeing's 737MAX disaster is a result of the company forgetting that it wasn't selling planes, it was selling aviation safety. These colleges are making a similar mistake when they assume that they're selling course. Not so. They'll selling the professors who teach those courses.

Posted by: Mike Perry | Dec 9, 2020 9:27:38 AM

Fascinating - so the STEM folks, with ongoing industry support, will hang on, while the Main Campus folks - History, Humanities, etc., will continue their #Studies March To Oblivion...?

Posted by: Anon | Dec 9, 2020 9:21:03 AM

Education only serves the public good when it educates, not when it indoctrinates.

Posted by: Pete | Dec 9, 2020 9:16:09 AM

I LOVE IT. I hope this catches on.

Posted by: Anon | Dec 8, 2020 5:48:00 PM

Faculty who don't want to teach face-to-face should go ahead and retire. Students don't want online. Sooner or later, they will vote with their feet and either go to institutions offering class room instruction or they won't go to higher ed at all.

Posted by: Dale Spradling | Dec 8, 2020 9:03:09 AM