Saturday, August 15, 2020
Justice Department: Yale Illegally Discriminates Against Asians And Whites In Admissions
Department of Justice, Justice Department Finds Yale Illegally Discriminates Against Asians and Whites in Undergraduate Admissions in Violation of Federal Civil-Rights Laws:
The Department of Justice today notified Yale University of its findings that Yale illegally discriminates against Asian American and white applicants in its undergraduate admissions process in violation of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The findings are the result of a two-year investigation in response to a complaint by Asian American groups concerning Yale’s conduct.
“There is no such thing as a nice form of race discrimination,” said Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband for the Civil Rights Division. “Unlawfully dividing Americans into racial and ethnic blocs fosters stereotypes, bitterness, and division. It is past time for American institutions to recognize that all people should be treated with decency and respect and without unlawful regard to the color of their skin. In 1890, Frederick Douglass explained that the ‘business of government is to hold its broad shield over all and to see that every American citizen is alike and equally protected in his civil and personal rights.’ The Department of Justice agrees and will continue to fight for the civil rights of all people throughout our nation.”
As a condition of receiving millions of dollars in taxpayer funding, Yale expressly agrees to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a cornerstone civil-rights law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and activities that receive federal financial assistance.
The Department of Justice found Yale discriminates based on race and national origin in its undergraduate admissions process, and that race is the determinative factor in hundreds of admissions decisions each year. For the great majority of applicants, Asian Americans and whites have only one-tenth to one-fourth of the likelihood of admission as African American applicants with comparable academic credentials. Yale rejects scores of Asian American and white applicants each year based on their race, whom it otherwise would admit.
Although the Supreme Court has held that colleges receiving federal funds may consider applicants’ race in certain limited circumstances as one of a number of factors, the Department of Justice found Yale’s use of race is anything but limited. Yale uses race at multiple steps of its admissions process resulting in a multiplied effect of race on an applicant’s likelihood of admission, and Yale racially balances its classes.
The Department of Justice has demanded Yale agree not to use race or national origin in its upcoming 2020-2021 undergraduate admissions cycle, and, if Yale proposes to consider race or national origin in future admissions cycles, it must first submit to the Department of Justice a plan demonstrating its proposal is narrowly tailored as required by law, including by identifying a date for the end of race discrimination.
- Chronicle of Higher Education, Justice Department Accuses Yale of Racial Discrimination in Admissions. But What About the Evidence?
- Forbes, The Justice Department Says Yale Is Violating Civil Rights Law. It May Be Going For A Knock-Out Blow Against Affirmative Action Everywhere
- Inside Higher Ed, Justice Department v. Yale
- New York Times, Justice Dept. Accuses Yale of Discrimination in Application Process
- NPR, DOJ: Yale Discriminates Against Asian American and White Applicants In Admissions
- Politico, Justice Department Finds Yale Discriminates Against Asian, White Applicants
- Wall Street Journal, Yale Discriminated by Race in Undergraduate Admissions, Justice Department Says
- Washington Post, Justice Department Accuses Yale of Illegal Bias Against White, Asian American Applicants in Admissions
- Washington Post, Why the U.S. Is Threatening Yale Over Race and Admissions
https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2020/08/justice-department-yale-illegally-discriminates-against-asians-and-whites-in-admissions.html
Comments
Unemployed Troll: "Those are generalized statements with no discussion or citations to the underlying data."
This from the man or woman who refuses, repeat refuses, to ever cite a single shred of data to support any claims he or she makes, ever. I'll just note that while you complain about white legacies, and conflate them with athletes and other categories, neither you nor Yale cited which data was missing from the DOJ analysis. As I read their notice, they examined ALL applications for the last 20 years, almost.
But I'll just cut to the heart of the matter, because that's how you get to the truth in every case. This is the second or third time you've defended, or failed to even acknowledge, the racially discriminatory policies practiced against white, Asian, and probably Jewish applicants at elite universities run by white leftists. You've clearly got no problem when leftists discriminate on the basis of race, in the pursuit of racual quotas which are totally unconstitutional. You've also avoided the specific charge by the DOJ that Yale is violating the 1964 Civil Rights Act and related court precendents on the use of race in admissions.
You also recently advocated abolishing the SATs because they have racist origins. Yale was founded by white racists. It's still named after a slaveholders.
Why, sir or ma'am, are you defending a racist institution? Why aren't you advocating for it's total abolition like you did with the SATs?
Is moral consistency so hard for you to demonstrate?
I don't expect any direct answers to these simple questions.
Posted by: MM | Aug 22, 2020 3:19:33 PM
MM,
Those are generalized statements with no discussion or citations to the underlying data, dear. Not nearly as specific as the hundreds of pages Karabel and Golden spend outlining how underqualified white legacy, athlete, and megabucks students were accepted over more academically proficient students of all races for the last hundred years. But I guess that's different because... reasons. It's frankly hilarious that DOJ is pretending those practices aren't ongoing at Yale right now.
Now once again, why did you and your ilk have no problem for the last thirty years with the Department of Education's investigation finding that Asian-American applicants to Harvard were losing slots to underqualified white legacies and athletes? Oh, right - because you didn't care, because it wasn't being used as a wedge issue against affirmative action.
Posted by: Unemployed Northeastern | Aug 20, 2020 8:43:22 AM
More from the DOJ notice:
"Yale uses race at multiple points in its admissions process. Yale uses race when it initially rates applicants, when it again rates those previously rated applicants, and again when it considers applicants at subsequent stages of the admissions process. Yale discriminates based on race among comparable applicants to whom Yale’s own admissions staff gave identical ratings earlier in the admissions process. Yale’s use of race at multiple steps of its admissions process results in a multiplied effect of race on an applicant’s likelihood of admission. Yale’s race discrimination contrasts starkly with the program upheld in Fisher II, in which the University of Texas considered race as one “subfactor” of its multi-factor assessment of applicants."
If any apologist for Yale would like to convince me that this practice doesn't violate the 1964 Civil Rights Act and related court precedent, I'm all ears. But I'm not holding my breath.
Posted by: MM | Aug 18, 2020 8:19:26 PM
UT: "Note, if you will, the complete lack of specificity and data in the press release."
You obviously didn't read the press release, which states:
"The Department has reviewed extensive documentation related to Yale’s undergraduate admissions process, interviewed admissions officials, and analyzed voluminous admissions data."
That's par for the course for you. It also concludes from this trove of data:
"Every year from 2000 to 2017, Yale offered admission to Asian American applicants to Yale College at rates below their proportion of the applicant pool. During this same 18-year period, Yale offered admission to White applicants at rates below their proportion of the applicant pool in a majority of years. And, every year during the same 18-year period, Yale admitted applicants to Yale College from Yale's preferred racial groups at rates higher than their representation in the applicant pool."
Thanks again for carrying making escuses for white leftists who run the Ivy League, and their racist and discriminatory policies that have now been determined violate the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Keep it up, you're a great advocate for the current wave of woke insanity sweeping academia.
Posted by: MM | Aug 18, 2020 8:08:29 PM
Everyone knows this is true, but people will dismiss it as politics
Posted by: Mike Livingston | Aug 16, 2020 3:54:56 AM
More importantly DoJ should make clear that for employers to transparently test skills and knowledge is not racist and is much better for all than counting on these corrupt college gatekeepers. By inflating admissions requirements for all but a "favored" few, they drive up per student costs, impose a HUGE disparate impact on most lower income groups and would-be students with families to take care of, and price many grads out of the enlightened deeds they supposedly promote.
Posted by: Anand Desai | Aug 15, 2020 5:23:18 PM
A tremendous opinion piece on this subject:
https://nypost.com/2020/08/15/yale-cant-discriminate-against-jews-and-asians-and-expect-taxpayer-money/
Someone actually advocating for the end of blind orchestra auditions:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/16/arts/music/blind-auditions-orchestras-race.html
Posted by: Anon | Aug 15, 2020 2:38:47 PM
Wrong link above.
For example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_party_strength_in_Georgia_(U.S._state)
Posted by: Anon | Aug 15, 2020 2:21:00 PM
I think colleges (white marxist liberals) are going to be so sad when they have to start from scratch and find ways to convince Asians they're oppressed and need to vote Democrat.
It's also going to be fun watching them try and erase history and convince Asians that it was really Republicans that were discriminating against them in admissions all these years. I can't wait to hear party switch hoax 2.0.
Re: Party switch hoax 1.0:
https://ballotpedia.org/Partisan_composition_of_state_legislatures
Posted by: Anon | Aug 15, 2020 2:17:17 PM
The DOJ lost the same suit against Harvard in October 2019. Now they're going after Yale on the same theory.
Posted by: Ted Seto | Aug 15, 2020 12:47:19 PM
I'm waiting for our resident Unemployed Troll to go to bat for Yale and defend this violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Enlighten everybody, please...
Posted by: MM | Aug 15, 2020 11:28:45 AM
In other reporting Yale notes that the DOJ hasn't even taken receipt of all of Yale's admissions info before jumping to this conclusion - note, if you will, the complete lack of specificity and data in the press release. This frankly reeks not only of cherry-picking data (see also: the failed Fisher and SFFA litigation) but of desperate white resentment grandstanding by an administration down 10 to 15% points in the polls less than three months from the election.
Posted by: Unemployed Northeastern | Aug 15, 2020 8:38:32 AM
P.S.
Legacies, athletes, children of employees, and early applicants are not protected classes, nor are they racially exclusive categories, under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
That fact bears notice, while our resident unemployed troll again and again and again carries water for elite institutions that actually discriminate against whole racial and ethnic groups under the cover of affirmative action.
Posted by: MM | Aug 24, 2020 7:40:53 PM