C. S. Lewis, Learning in War-Time (sermon preached in the Church of St. Mary the Virgin, Oxford, Autumn 1939):
A University is a society for the pursuit of learning. As students, you will be expected to make yourselves, or to start making yourselves, in to what the Middle Ages called clerks: into philosophers, scientists, scholars, critics, or historians. And at first sight this seems to be an odd thing to do during a great war. What is the use of beginning a task which we have so little chance of finishing? Or, even if we ourselves should happen not to be interrupted by death or military service, why should we — indeed how can we — continue to take an interest in these placid occupations when the lives of our friends and the liberties of Europe are in the balance? Is it not like fiddling while Rome burns?
Now it seems to me that we shall not be able to answer these questions until we have put them by the side of certain other questions which every Christian ought to have asked himself in peace-time. I spoke just now of fiddling while Rome burns. But to a Christian the true tragedy of Nero must be not that he fiddles while the city was on fire but that he fiddles on the brink of hell. ... [E]very Christian who comes to a university must at all times face a question compared with which the questions raised by the war are relatively unimportant. He must ask himself how it is right, or even psychologically possible,for creatures who are every moment advancing either to heaven or to hell, to spend any fraction of the little time allowed them in this world on such comparative trivialities as literature or art, mathematics or biology. If human culture can stand up to that, it can stand up to anything. To admit that we can retain our interest in learning under the shadow of these eternal issues, but not under the shadow of a European war, would be to admit that our ears are closed to the voice of reason and very wide open to the voice of our nerves and our mass emotions. ...
We have to inquire whether there is really any legitimate place for the activities of the scholar in a world such as this. That is, we have always to answer the question: "How can you be so frivolous and selfish as to think about anything but the salvation of human souls?" and we have, at the moment, to answer the additional question, "How can you be so frivolous and selfish as to think of anything but the war?" Now part of our answer will be the same for both questions. The one implies that our life can, and ought, to become exclusively and explicitly religious: the other, that it can and ought to become exclusively national. I believe that our whole life can, and indeed must, become religious in a sense to be explained later. But if it is meant that all our activities are to be of the kind that can be recognized as "sacred" and ties are to be of the kind that can be recognized as "sacred" and opposed to "secular" then I would give a single reply to both my imaginary assailants. I would say, "Whether it ought to happen or not, the thing you are recommending is not going to happen." Before I became a Christian I do not think I fully realized that one's life, after conversion, would inevitably consist in doing most of the same things one had been doing before: one hopes, in a new spirit, but still the same things. ...
We are now in a position to answer the view that human culture is an inexcusable frivolity on the part of creatures loaded with such awful responsibilities as we. I reject at once an idea which lingers in the mind of some modern people that cultural activities are in their own right spiritual and meritorious — as though scholars and poets were intrinsically more pleasing to God than scavengers and bootblacks. I think it was Matthew Arnold who first used the English word spiritual in the sense of the German geistlich, and so inaugurated this most dangerous and most anti-Christian error. Let us clear it forever from our minds.The work of a Beethoven, and the work of a charwoman, become spiritual on precisely the same condition, that of being offered to God, of being done humbly "as to the Lord". This does not, of course, mean that it is for anyone a mere toss-up whether he should sweep rooms or compose symphonies. A mole must dig to the glory of God and a cock must crow. We are members of one body, but differentiated members, each with his own vocation. A man's upbringing, his talents, his circumstances, are usually a tolerable index of his vocation. If our parents have sent us to Oxford, if our country allows us to remain there, this is prima facie evidence that the life which we, at any rate, can best lead to the glory of God at present is the learned life.
By leading that life to the glory of God I do not, of course, mean any at tempt to make our intellectual inquiries work out to edifying conclusions. That would be, as Bacon says, to offer to the author of truth the unclean sacrifice of a lie. I mean the pursuit of knowledge and beauty, in a sense, for their own sake, but in a sense which does not exclude their being for God's sake. An appetite for these things exists in the human mind, and God makes no appetite in vain. We can therefore pursue knowledge as such, and beauty, as such, in the sure confidence that by so doing we are either advancing to the vision of God ourselves or indirectly helping others to do so. Humility, no less than the appetite, encourages us to concentrate simply on the knowledge or the beauty, not too much concerning ourselves with their ultimate relevance to the vision of God. That relevance may not be intended for us but for our betters — for men who come after and find the spiritual significance of what we dug out in blind and humble obedience to our vocation. This is the teleological argument that the existence of the impulse and the faculty prove that they must have a proper function in God's scheme — the argument by which Thomas Aquinas probes that sexuality would have existed even without the Fall. The soundness of the argument, as regards culture, is proved by experience. The intellectual life is not the only road to God, nor the safest, but we find it to be a road, and it may be the appointed road for us. Of course, it will be so only so long as we keep the impulse pure and disinterested. That is the great difficulty. As the author of the Theologia Germanicai says, we may come to love knowledge — our knowing — more than the thing known: to delight not in the exercise of our talents but in the fact that they are ours, or even in the reputation they bring us. Every success in the scholar's life increases this danger. If it becomes irresistible, he must give up his scholarly work. The time for plucking our the right eye has arrived. ...
The learned life then is, for some, a duty. At the moment it looks as if it were your duty. I am well aware that there may seem to be an almost comic discrepancy between the high issues we have been considering and the immediate task you may be set down to, such as Anglo-Saxon sound laws or chemical formulae. But there is a similar shock awaiting us in every vocation — a young priest finds himself involved in choir treats and a young subaltern in accounting for pots of jam. It is well that it should be so. It weeds out the vain, windy people and keeps in those who are both humble and tough. On that kind of difficulty we need waste no sympathy.
But the peculiar difficulty imposed on you by the war is another matter: and of it I would again repeat, what I have been saying in one form or another ever since I started — do not let your nerves and emotions lead you into thinking your present predicament more abnormal than it really is. Perhaps it may be useful to mention the three mental exercises which may serve as defenses against the three enemies which war raises up against the scholar.
The first enemy is excitement — the tendency to think and feel about the war when we had intended to think about our work. Thebest defense is a recognition that in this, as in everything else, the war has not really raised up a new enemy but only aggravated an old one. There are always plenty of rivals to our work. We are always falling in love or quarreling, looking for jobs or fearing to lose them, getting ill and recovering, following public affairs. If we let ourselves, we shall always be waiting for some distraction or other to end before we can really get down to our work. The only people who achieve much are those who want knowledge so badly that they seek it while the conditions are still unfavorable. Favorable conditions never come. There are, of course, moments when the pressure of the excitement is so great that any superhuman self-control could not resist it. They come both in war and peace. We must do the best we can.
The second enemy is frustration — the feeling that we shall not have time to finish. If I say to you that no one has time to finish, that the longest human life leaves a man, in any branch of learning, a beginner, I shall seem to you to be saying something quite academic and theoretical. You would be surprised if you knew how soon one begins to feel the shortness of the tether: of how many things, even in middle life, we lave to say "No time for that", "Too late now", and "Not for me". But Nature herself forbids you to share that experience. A more Christian attitude, which can be attained at any age, is that of leaving futurity in God's hands. We may as well, for God will certainly retain it whether we leave it to Him or not. Never, in peace or war, commit your virtue or your happiness to the future. Happy work is best done by the man who takes his long-term plans somewhat lightly and works from moment to moment "as to the Lord". It is only our daily bread that we are encouraged to ask for. The present is the only time in which any duty can be done or any grace received.
The third enemy is fear. War threatens us with death and pain. No man -- and specially no Christian who remembers Gethsemane — need try to attain a stoic indifference about these things: but we can guard against the illusions of the imagination. We think of the streets of Warsaw and contrast the deaths there suffered with an abstraction called Life. But there is no question of death or life for any of us; only a question of this death or of that — of a machine gun bullet now or a cancer forty years later. What does war do to death? It certainly does not make it more frequent; 100 per cent of us die, and the percentage cannot be increased. It puts several deaths earlier; but I hardly suppose that that is what we fear. Certainly when the moment comes, it will make little difference how many years we have behind us. Does it increase our chance of a painful death? I doubt it. As far as I can find out, what we call natural death is usually preceded by suffering; and a battlefield is one of the very few places where one has a reasonable prospect of dying with no pain at all. Does it decrease our chances of dying at peace with God? I cannot believe it. If active service does not persuade a man to prepare for death, what conceivable concatenation of circumstance would? Yet war does do something to death. It forces us to remember it. The only reason why the cancer at sixty or the paralysis at seventy-five do not bother us is that we forget them. War makes death real to us: and that would have been regarded as one of its blessings by most of the great Christians of the past.
They thought it good for us to be always aware of our mortality. I am inclined to think they were right.
All the animal life in us, all schemes of happiness that centered in this world, were always doomed to a final frustration. In ordinary times only a wise man can realize it. Now the stupidest of us know. We see unmistakable the sort of universe in which we have all along been living, and must come to terms with it. If we had foolish un-Christian hopes about human culture, they are now shattered. If we thought we were building up a heaven on earth, if we looked for something that would turn the present world from a place of pilgrimage into a permanent city satisfying the soul of man, we are disillusioned, and not a moment too soon. But if we thought that for some souls, and at some times, the life of learning, humbly offered to God, was, in its own small way, one of the appointed approaches to the Divine reality and the Divine beauty which we hope to enjoy hereafter, we can think so still.
Hat Tip: Bob Cochran.
Update: Jonathan H. Adler (Case Western), Is Learning in Corona-time Like Learning in Wartime?:
A colleague recommended I read "Learning in Wartime," a sermon delivered by C.S. Lewis in the fall of 1939. It was an excellent suggestion. Although I do not share Lewis' faith, I found it to be simultaneously comforting and inspiring—just what I needed at that moment.
The current situation prompted me to revisit the Lewis sermon, and I thought I would recommend it to our readers. Like Lewis' thought generally, the sermon is steeped in his faith, but I believe it has something to offer for theists and non-theists alike—or at least I hope so.
TaxProf Blog coronavirus coverage:
- Evacuated From Wuhan, Law Prof Works On Her Law Review Article During 14-Day Mandatory Coronavirus Quarantine (Feb. 11, 2020)
- Mitchell Hamline To Train Peking Faculty To Deliver Online Legal Instruction To Replace Classes Cancelled Due To Coronavirus (Feb. 24, 2020)
- First Law School Closes Due To Coronavirus; Student At Second Law School Self-Quarantines Due To Exposure (Mar. 4, 2020)
- New York Law Student In Self-Quarantine After Exposure To Coronavirus (Mar. 4, 2020)
- Stanford, University Of Washington Cancel In-Person Classes (But Not Athletic Events), Students To Complete Courses And Exams On-Line; Duke Warns It May Be Forced To Do The Same After Spring Break (Mar. 7, 2020)
- The Impact Of COVID-19 On Legal Education (Mar. 8, 2020)
- Law Schools Shift Classes Online Amid COVID-19, But Can They Do It Successfully? (Mar. 11, 2020)
- ABA Loosens Reins On Online Legal Education Amid Coronavirus Spread (Mar. 13, 2020)
- COVID-19 And The Future Of The Academy (Mar. 13, 2019)
- Fair Use And Emergency Remote Teaching And Research (Mar. 15, 2020)
- Law Teaching In The Age Of Coronavirus (Mar. 15, 2020)
- Michael Hunter Schwartz (Dean, McGeorge), Towards A Modality-Less Model For Excellence In Law School Teaching (Mar. 16, 2020)
- Larry Cunningham (Associate Dean, St. John's), Cunningham: Assessment In A Time Of Coronavirus And Closed Campuses (Mar. 16, 2020)
- Coronavirus And The Great Online-Learning Experiment (Mar. 17, 2020)
- Academe’s Coronavirus Shock Doctrine: 'Faculty Should Hesitate Before Doing More' (Mar. 17, 2020)
- 100% Of Law Schools Have Moved Online Due To The Coronavirus (Mar. 18, 2020)
- Regulating In A Pandemic: Evaluating Economic And Financial Policy Responses To The Coronavirus Crisis (Mar. 18, 2020)
- March LSAT Is Canceled, Fate Of April Test Is Uncertain (Mar. 18, 2020)
- I Will Survive (Coronavirus Version For Law Professors Teaching Online) (Mar. 18, 2020)
- WSJ: Tax Law Changes Make Life Harder For Firms Facing Coronavirus Losses (Mar. 19, 2020)
- Law Schools Adopt Pass-Fail Grades As They Move Online Amid COVID-19 (Mar. 19, 2020)
- 30-Minute Webinar On Using Zoom For Law School Classes (Mar. 19, 2020)
- Tax Options For Economic Relief During The Coronavirus Crisis (Mar. 20, 2020)
- 13-Minute Video On Tips For Law Professors Teaching Online (Mar. 20, 2020)
- Weekly SSRN Tax Article Review And Roundup: Layser Reviews Evaluating Economic And Financial Policy Responses To The Coronavirus (Mar. 20, 2020)
- The Law Student Coronavirus Survival Guide (Mar. 21, 2020)
- C.S. Lewis: Studying Law In The Age Of Coronavirus (Mar. 22, 2020)
- Moody's Downgrades Higher Education From 'Stable' To 'Negative' Due To The Coronavirus (Mar. 23, 2020)
- Adler: Grading In The Time Of Coronavirus — For Most Law Schools, Pass/Fail Is A Mistake (Mar. 23, 2020)
- Blackman: Law Schools Should Not Abandon Standard Grading Policies For All Students Due To The Coronavirus (Mar. 23, 2020)
- Free Online Content: Business Taxation/Subchapter K (Mar. 23, 2020)
- NALP Cannot Compel Law Firms To Move OCI To January, But Urges Communication About COVID-Related Changes (Mar. 24, 2020)
- The Bar Exam And The COVID-19 Pandemic: The Need For Immediate Action (Mar. 24, 2020)
- Symphony In The Age Of Coronavirus (Mar. 24, 2020)
- Hillary Clinton, 880,000 Others Have Viewed Arkansas Law Prof's Online Crim Pro Lecture (Mar. 24, 2020)
- 2019 Summer Associate Offers (98%) Hit All-Time High, But Coronavirus Casts Shadow Over 2020 Summer Programs (Mar. 25, 2020)
- Blackman: Law Professors Quietly Oppose Pass/Fail Grading (Mar. 25, 2020)
- 100% Of Higher Education Has Shifted Online Due To The Coronavirus (Mar. 25, 2020)
- Assessment In Online Law School Classes (Mar. 25, 2020)
- Test-At-Home Option During Coronavirus May Be Attractive To Applicants At 50+ Law Schools That Accept The GRE (Mar. 25, 2020)
- 'People Are Pissed': Pass/Fail Grading Controversy Roils Law Schools (Mar. 26, 2020)
- The New Normal At Pepperdine Caruso Law Online (Mar. 26, 2020)
- Blackman: Law Students Quietly Oppose Pass/Fail Grading (Mar. 26, 2020)
- Status Of July Bar Exam, August MPRE Exam (Mar. 26, 2020)
- Law Professor, Law Student Diagnosed With COVID-19 (Mar. 26, 2020)
- Law Students Share Anxiety, Support On Reddit Over Grading Policies In Wake Of Coronavirus (Mar. 27, 2020)
- NCBE To Decide By May 5 Whether It Will Provide MBE For July Bar Examinations (Mar. 27, 2020)
- Neil Diamond's Sweet Caroline For The Age Of The Coronavirus: 'Hands ... Washing Hands' (Mar. 28, 2020)
- Zatz: The Case For Mandatory Pass/Fail Grading In Spring 2020 (Mar. 28, 2020)
- Muller: Thoughts About (And Mostly Against) Pass-Fail Law School Grading During Covid-19 (Mar. 29, 2020)
- Krauss: Should Law Schools Grade Pass-Fail This Semester? (Mar. 29, 2020)
- Klein: Prisoner's Dilemmas And Straw Men: A Response To Blackman, Adler, And Krauss On Law School Grading (Mar. 29, 2020)
- Zatz: Crisis Grading Policy 2.0 — Universality Over Carve-Outs (Mar. 29, 2020)
- University Of Chicago Law School Sticks To ‘Status Quo’ Grading, Bucking Peers’ Move To Mandatory Pass-Fail (Mar. 30, 2020)
- Massachusetts Joins New York In Postponing July Bar Exam (Mar. 30, 2020)
- Spivey: How Will COVID-19 Impact Law Schools? (Mar. 30, 2020)
- A Tax Prof's Day In Covid-19 America Without Child Care (Mar. 30, 2020)
- Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Arizona Board Of Regents Demanding Repayment Of Room & Board For Students Displaced By Covid-19 (Mar. 31, 2020)
- A Third Of MBA Admits May Defer; 43% Want Tuition Lowered If Classes Are Online (Mar. 31, 2020)
- Connecticut Is Third State To Postpone July Bar Exam (Mar. 31, 2020)
- Amid More Bar Exam Delays, Push For Diploma Privilege Grows (Mar. 31, 2020)
- AccessLex Donates $25,000 To Student Emergency Funds At All 200 Law Schools (Mar. 31, 2020)
- Law Schools' Pass/Fail Decision Doesn't Ace All Tests (Apr. 1, 2020)
- With Pass/Fail Now The Norm, Outlier Law Schools Face Student Backlash (Apr. 1, 2020)
- Hawaii Is Fourth State To Postpone July Bar Exam (Apr. 2, 2020)
- ‘A Decidedly Suboptimal Set of Circumstances’: Harvard Law Profs Evaluate Online Instruction (Apr. 2, 2020)
- Pepperdine Provides Covid-19 Legal Resources For Those In Need (Apr. 2, 2020)