Paul L. Caron

Wednesday, October 2, 2019

Speaking Out Against Student Evaluations Of Teaching

Inside Higher Ed, Speaking Out Against Student Evals:

Questioning what student evaluations of teaching actually measure, various institutions have already said they won't use them in high-stakes personnel decisions or as the primary measure of teaching effectiveness.

Now the American Sociological Association and 17 other professional organizations, including the American Historical Association, are urging all colleges and universities to do the same.

"Because these instruments are cheap, easy to implement, and provide a simple way to gather information, they are the most common method used to evaluate faculty teaching for hiring, tenure, promotion, contract renewal and merit raises," reads a new statement from the sociological association, endorsed by other scholarly groups.

Despite these evaluations' "ubiquity," however, "a growing body of evidence suggests that their use in personnel decisions is problematic." The statement cites more than a dozen studies finding that students' evaluations are weakly related to other measures of teaching effectiveness, used in statistically problematic ways and can be influenced by factors such as times of day and class size. It notes that both observational and experimental research has found these evaluations to be biased against women and people of color, and says that adjuncts are particularly vulnerable in a system that depends on them for teaching performance data.

Given these "limitations," the association "encourages institutions to use evidence-based best practices for collecting and using student feedback about teaching."

More specifically, the association recommends that questions on student evaluations should be framed as "an opportunity for student feedback, rather than an opportunity for formal ratings" of teaching effectiveness. It nods to Augsburg University and the University of North Carolina at Asheville, which have both revised their evaluation instruments and renamed them (as the university course survey and the student feedback on instruction form, respectively), to emphasize the difference between feedback and ratings.

Moreover, the association says -- echoing many researchers and faculty advocates -- these evaluations should "not be used as the only evidence of teaching effectiveness." They should instead be used, when used at all, as part of a "holistic assessment that includes peer observations, reviews of teaching materials, and instructor self-reflections." ...

Philip Stark, a professor of statistics at the University of California at Berkeley who has written a number of studies demonstrating how student evaluations are flawed as a measure of teaching effectiveness, said that his own views against them have strengthened over time, and with new research. Evaluations may measure students' "satisfaction," he said, but that's not the same as teaching effectiveness.

Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink


Note, the students fill out evaluations because senior faculty are too 'collegial' to actually attend lectures by junior faculty, or insist on videotape submissions. Bums.

Posted by: Art Deco | Oct 2, 2019 9:20:23 AM