Paul L. Caron
Dean


Monday, July 8, 2019

The Unbearable Pointlessness Of PowerPoint

Chronicle of Higher Education:  The Unbearable Pointlessness of PowerPoint, by Alan Wolfe (Boston College):

PowerPoint 1PowerPoint is everywhere in the contemporary university. And so long as it is, superficiality will eclipse idiosyncratic and original thought.

In the academy, PowerPoint originated with the natural sciences. Then it spread to those social sciences such as psychology and economics that deal with large amounts of data or rely on complex mathematical modeling. It is neither my intention nor my inclination to judge its appropriateness for such fields, although it is worth mentioning that the renegade political scientist Edward Tufte finds them highly problematic even for the sciences. Tufte shows how reliance on PowerPoint, especially its condensation of information into categories ranked in importance, as well as its proclivity to reduce information to fit conveniently onto a slide, led scientists at NASA to misjudge the danger faced by the damaged space shuttle on its return to earth.

A reliance on PowerPoint in the humanities and soft social sciences is another matter. From the way graduate students are taught to the way they themselves eventually teach, PowerPoint has become the essential means of academic communication, and a much less vibrant academic culture is the inevitable result.

Among the major purposes of the nine-year graduate-school experience these days — nine years being the average in the humanities — is to prepare the student to give a seamless PowerPoint presentation at a job talk. Everything else, including courses, comprehensive exams, and even the writing of a dissertation, which no one outside the thesis committee will ever read, is window-dressing.

In graduate school, numerous hours are devoted to job-talk practice sessions, including rigorous questions about method that a young academic will face when she goes out on the "market." To meet those challenges, students develop an outline that can be shown on one slide in summary form, nearly always with categories such as (1) the problem; (2) why existing research fails to grapple with it; (3) my approach and innovative methodology; (4) my results; and (5) implications for future research or, if in the social sciences, policy. Careful attention will be paid to the third and fourth points; it is imperative to speak carefully about method because the interviewees, having themselves gone through this process in the recent past, are more comfortable there than they are with actual findings. Practiced well, the whole thing takes about 50 minutes, just enough to appear comprehensive without completely boring the audience, although the latter is always a risk. Generally during a PowerPoint presentation the lights are dim, as if to remind everyone how far we have come from the great thinkers of the Enlightenment. ...

As problematic as it may be for spontaneity, however, there is much that is reassuring about the sameness PowerPoint induces. Job talks are meant to remind everyone, no doubt including the presenters themselves, that they will act in acceptable ways if hired. PowerPoint does more than outline a research project; it provides an outline to the lives job candidates hope to lead. Just like their methodology, they will do everything in the right order, first obtaining publication in prestigious journals, then moving on to a new, but related, field, and finally proving the department’s wisdom by obtaining tenure, where they can begin the process all over again with a new generation of graduate students. "Humanists," writes Leonard Cassuto, an English professor at Fordham University, "worship great artists who break molds. But even as they value such iconoclasm in their articles and classrooms, humanists maintain highly restrictive molds for themselves." PowerPoint enables them to do so. ...

If PowerPoint for graduate students cripples the imagination, PowerPoint for undergraduates paralyzes the mind. Undergraduates unable to live without PowerPoint lose the capacity to develop rich and enriching narratives. Even when filled with ideas, their reliance on a tried-and-true method of presenting them detracts from their originality. They have no place in their mental equipment for irony and puzzlement unless such against-the-text emotions are announced in advance, perhaps with an emoji on the slide. Unable to speak or write freely, their thinking lacks originality. ...

The most interesting aspects of the world lie between the categories and off the grid. Because graduate students rely on PowerPoint, our undergraduates, like those who teach them, are being trained never to expect the unexpected.

https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2019/07/the-unbearable-pointlessness-of-powerpoint.html

Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink

Comments

TL; DR.

Is there a PowerPoint version of this article?

Posted by: AMTbuff | Jul 8, 2019 3:59:59 PM

I used to teach eight-hour CPE seminars for CPAs and was an early adopter of portable projectors and PowerPoint in the mid-to-late '90s. I would use the opening clip of Patton standing in front of the flag to start the day. Before lunch I would show the cafeteria scene from Animal House, i.e., the one ending with the Zit gag, and admonish the group there have been complaints about their eating habits. After the afternoon break, Top Gun was a great way of waking people up. But PowerPoint? All I used it for was as an outline to keep me on track. You see, I have a tendency to wander off the reservation, gee look at that funny puppy video, where was I? Oh, PowerPoint. I stopped using it. I would let students download it from the class website, but I never used it in class. Because nobody takes notes anymore, I found a better learning tool was to force students to hand complete small assignments in class.

Posted by: Dale W. Spradling PhD, CPA | Jul 10, 2019 5:39:37 AM