Paul L. Caron

Saturday, March 3, 2018

Give Students Who Complete Their 1L Year And Then Leave A Master’s Degree In Legal Principles

Joni Hersch (Vanderbilt), Increasing Diversity by a New Master’s Degree in Legal Principles, 67 J. Legal Educ. 86 (2017):

Students who leave their J.D. program before graduation leave emptyhanded, without an additional degree or other credential indicating that their law school studies had any professional, educational, or marketable value. The absence of such a credential combines with the substantial risks and costs associated with law school education to discourage risk-averse students from applying. The adverse impacts of these risks may be especially great for lower-income students who have fewer financial resources to draw on and less information about their fit with legal education and the legal profession. I propose that law schools award a master’s degree to students who successfully complete the 1L curriculum but leave before completing the full J.D. curriculum. My suggested name for this degree is master of legal principles (M.L.P.).

This degree option would lower the risks associated with law school enrollment as well as provide a valuable and largely standardized employment credential. Using detailed educational data from the National Survey of College Graduates (NSCG), I show that the lack of fi eld-specifi c training provided by undergraduate majors impedes learning about the likely fi t of potential students with the law school curriculum and the legal profession. Using labor market data from the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Information Network (O*NET), I document a wide range of occupations for which the M.L.P. degree would be appropriate, in that these occupations draw on legal knowledge but do not require a J.D. degree. Without the debt associated with the full J.D. curriculum, those with the M.L.P. would be positioned to provide limited legal services at a lower cost, thus increasing access to justice. The expanded degree off ering of an M.L.P. degree also would benefi t law schools by attracting more, and more diverse, applicants.

Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink


Participation trophy.

Posted by: Innf | Mar 3, 2018 3:01:44 PM

"This degree option would lower the risks associated with law school enrollment as well as provide a valuable and largely standardized employment credential."

Thanks. I haven't had a laugh like that in a long time.

- Holder of an actual JD from the top 1/3 of law schools that has an approximate worth of absolutely nothing whatsoever

Posted by: Unemployed Northeastern | Mar 3, 2018 11:16:46 PM

This is not a new idea, and it wasn't new when we did it at Cleveland-Marshall ...

Posted by: Craig Boise | Mar 5, 2018 12:11:26 AM

I have a better idea. Don't require a 3 year J.D. for any occupation. Generally, after 1L, there are no required substantive law courses. How could it possibly be necessary for any occupation to take 2 more years of courses if it doesn't matter what those courses are?

Posted by: brad | Mar 6, 2018 9:35:12 AM