Peter J. Reilly (Forbes), IRS Scandal Daily Coverage The Final Chapter:
Last week, Paul Caron, the TaxProf, dean of the tax blogosphere, called an end to daily coverage of "The IRS Scandal" on Day 1352. This was 552 days beyond the point that I had opined that the series had "jumped the shark". To be clear, I was not suggesting that the Prof stop covering the scandal, just that there be an occasional day here and there on which there was nothing to report. So it just took another 552 posts for that to happen. It is worth noting that there were more Happy Days episodes after Fonzie jumped the shark than before, so maybe it was not such a bad call on my part.
Regardless, in order to make case for shark jumping I went through the series in two posts which are here and here. For the sake of completeness I thought it would be nice to go through the rest of the series to see how it is that the Prof managed to keep it going for over a year after my shark jumping call. Over a year ago, on Day 943, Professor Caron indicated that he was running out of material and it might be ending soon. Things changed on Day 984. He had thought that it might end at 1,000, but the certification of a class action lawsuit - NorCal Tea Party Patriots v IRS promised significant material for some time to come.
Just as a reminder. Day 1, May 10, 2013, is where the TaxProf count starts with the headline - IRS Admits to Targeting Conservative Groups in 2012 Election. ...
Day 1024 is in a class all by itself as we learn that Donald Trump has been audited so many times perhaps because he is such a strong Christian. ...
Scattered among the days are full scale commentary pieces about the scandal. I'm not going to give you a lot of links, but instead am putting out the three pieces that lay out the two extreme positions and a more intermediate one. On Day 1008 in recognition of the scandal millennium (by TaxProf day count) Jennifer Kabbany wrote in the National Review one of the best summaries of the scandal true believer creed. ...
The series also contains reference to the counter narrative. On Day 1144, we hear from Ralph Nader. ...
A more nuanced view, one that I find interesting although not persuasive, is put out by Joe Kristan. He believes what happens was a form of self-weaponization on the part of the IRS.
The self-weaponization of the bureaucracy against its political opponents is hugely depressing. The government workforce is overwhelmingly on the side of the political party that favors an ever-larger state. There are plenty of Lois Lerners in the IRS and throughout the Leviathan. The Tea Party scandal, and the complete lack of accountability for its perpetrators, gives no reason to hope those who don’t share that worldview can expect a fair shake. That’s especially true when the sitting president (referring to President Obama) shows no interest in discouraging such behavior
This view is buttressed by an entry on Day 965 with reports about federal employees giving more political donations to Democrats than Republicans. ...
Most of the commenters on the coverage tended to support the anti-IRS narrative. When I showed up, there would often be a brickbat thrown. My favorite was from somebody who goes by Porkypine:
Peter J. Reilly's writings on this matter in Forbes have tended to be IRS/Administration apologias, under a thin cloak of reasonableness. Too thin to cover the way he hovers between disingenuousness and mendacity in these efforts, however.
There was one though who joined me in scandal skepticism. That is Publius Novus whose last supportive comment was:
I am a Reilly Agnostic. I too would like to see what's under the rocks. Specifically, I would like to hear testimony from LLerner after an immunity grant. And if the Republicons were honest about pursuing this mess, they would grant immunity. Why not Mr. Chaffetz?
It is interesting to note that Paul Caron himself called for Lerner immunity in a piece on USA Today which was featured way back on Day 369. I have not had any luck in figuring out who Publius Novus actually is, Paul Caron has told me that he doesn't know. Joe Kristan suggested Judge Crater, a joke that was too obscure for me to get. Well, he or she should not have any trouble finding me.
And those comments are probably an indication of one of the best things about the TaxProf's chronicle. It took the people who follow it out of their bubbles. It will be interesting to see whether the crusade picks up again. I can see in the coming weeks as the practicality of the Obamacare replacement or the wall building becomes challenging, that representatives of the Trump administration and the Republican congressional majority will start pining for the days when the buck did not stop with them. Then they will recall that Lois Lerner was probably the best enemy that they ever had and the scandal will get another lease on life.
January 31, 2017 in IRS News, IRS Scandal, Tax | Permalink
| Comments (0)