Paul L. Caron

Thursday, June 2, 2016

The Importance Of Qualitative Assessment In Complementing Quantitative Measures Of Mid-Career Scholarly Performance

Mid-CareerFrank Pasquale (Maryland), Scholarship and Mid-Career Self-Assessments: A Brief Reflection on Simkovic’s What Can We Learn from Credit Markets?:

Chris J. Walker has written a very helpful series of posts for young professors on “how to become a voice in one’s field.” ... I also think that we can learn a great deal from the content of successful scholars’ inquiry. Usually, researchers only undertake this type of self-reflection when applying for jobs and preparing research agendas (a mostly private process), or at the end of a career (when a long list of accomplishments may seem too daunting to be relatable to younger peers). But winners of the ALI Young Scholars Medal appear to get invited to give a public talk on their work at an earlier stage of inquiry. Mike Simkovic (whose work I’ve previously praised here) gave such an address in May. ...

I recently proposed a paper to the MLA’s annual conference entitled “Beyond the False Certainties of Impact Factors, Altmetrics, and Download Counts: Qualitative & Narrative Accounts of Scholarship.” It arose out of my dissatisfaction with the metricization of accomplishment. As citation counts proliferate, accumulating the ersatz currency of reputational quantifications threatens to overwhelm the real purpose of research–just as financialization has all too often undermined the productive functions of the economy.

Traditional modes of assessment (including tenure letters and festschrift tributes) are an alternative form of evaluation. And an essay like Simkovic’s is an example of a type of self-evaluation that should become more popular among scholars at certain career milestones (like tenure, appointment to full professor or senior lecturer, and, say, every 5 or 10 years thenceforward.) We need better, more narrative, mid-career assessments of the depth and breadth of scholarly contributions. Such qualitative modes of evaluation can complement the quantification-driven metrics now ascendant in the academy.

Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink


This is definitely the big news story of the day in the legal world. Glad it made it up so quickly.

Posted by: JM | Jun 2, 2016 12:27:50 PM