Wednesday, March 23, 2016
IRS Scandal, Day 1049: 6th Circuit Slams IRS Treatment Of Tea Party Group
United States v. NorCal Tea Party Patiots, No. 15-3793 (6th Cir. Mar. 22, 2016)
Among the most serious allegations a federal court can address are that an Executive agency has targeted
Yet in this lawsuit the IRS has only compounded the conduct that gave rise to it. The plaintiffs seek damages on behalf of themselves and other groups whose applications the IRS treated in the manner described by the Inspector General. The lawsuit has progressed as slowly as the underlying applications themselves: at every turn the IRS has resisted the plaintiffs’ requests for information regarding the IRS’s treatment of the plaintiff class, eventually to the open frustration of the district court. At issue here are IRS “Be On the Lookout” lists of organizations allegedly targeted for unfavorable treatment because of their political beliefs. Those organizations in turn make up the plaintiff class. The district court ordered production of those lists, and did so again over an IRS motion to reconsider. Yet, almost a year later, the IRS still has not complied with the court’s orders. Instead the IRS now seeks from this court a writ of mandamus, an extraordinary remedy reserved to correct only the clearest abuses of power by a district court. We deny the petition.
Citizens for mistreatment based on their political views. No citizen—Republican or Democrat, socialist or libertarian—should be targeted or even have to fear being targeted on those grounds. Yet those are the grounds on which the plaintiffs allege they were mistreated by the IRS here. The allegations are substantial: most are drawn from findings made by the Treasury Department’s own Inspector General for Tax Administration. Those findings include that the IRS used political criteria to round up applications for tax-exempt status filed by so-called tea-party groups; that the IRS often took four times as long to process tea-party applications as other applications; and that the IRS served tea-party applicants with crushing demands for what the Inspector General called “unnecessary information.” ...
In closing, we echo the district court’s observations about this case. The lawyers in the Department of Justice have a long and storied tradition of defending the nation’s interests and enforcing its laws—all of them, not just selective ones—in a manner worthy of the Department’s name. The conduct of the IRS’s attorneys in the district court falls outside that tradition. We expect that the IRS will do better going forward. And we order that the IRS comply with the district court’s discovery orders of April 1 and June 16, 2015—without redactions, and without further delay.
- Breitbart, Appeals Court Slaps Down IRS in NorCal Tea Party Case
- Cincinnati Enquirer, Court Orders IRS to Provide Information in Tea Party Lawsuit
- Cleveland Plain Dealer, Federal Appeals Court Criticizes IRS for Delays in Tea Party Lawsuit
- The Volokh Conspiracy: Sixth Circuit Loses Patience with the IRS, by Jonathan Adler (Case Western)
- Washington Times, Court Rebukes IRS for Tea Party Targeting, Orders Release of Secret List
- WND, Tea Party Beats IRS in Federal Court
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1048 (Mar. 22, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1047 (Mar. 21, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1046 (Mar. 20, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1045 (Mar. 19, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1044 (Mar. 18, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1043 (Mar. 17, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1042 (Mar. 16, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1041 (Mar. 15, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1040 (Mar. 14, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1039 (Mar. 13, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1038 (Mar. 12, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1037 (Mar. 11, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1036 (Mar. 10, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1035 (Mar. 9, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1034 (Mat. 8, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1033 (Mar. 7, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1032 (Mar. 6, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1031 (Mar. 5, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1030 (Mar. 4, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1029 (Mar. 3, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1028 (Mar. 2, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1027 (Mar. 1, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1026 (Feb. 29, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1025 (Feb. 28, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1024 (Feb. 27, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1023 (Feb. 26, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1022 (Feb. 25, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1021 (Feb. 24, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1020 (Feb. 23, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1019 (Feb. 22, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1018 (Feb. 21, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1017 (Feb. 20, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1016 (Feb. 19, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1015 (Feb. 18, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1014 (Feb. 17, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1013 (Feb. 16, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1012 (Feb. 15, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1011 (Feb. 14, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1010 (Feb. 13, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1009 (Feb. 12, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1008 (Feb. 11, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1007 (Feb. 10, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1006 (Feb. 9, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1005 (Feb. 8, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1004 (Feb. 7, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1003 (Feb. 6, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1002 (Feb. 5, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 1001 (Feb. 4, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 901-1000 (Oct. 27, 2015 - Feb. 3, 2016)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 801-900 (July 19, 2015 - Oct. 26, 2015)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 701-800 (April 10, 2015 - July 18, 2015)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 601-700 (Dec. 31, 2014 - April 9, 2015)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 501-600 (Sept. 22, 2014-Dec. 30, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 401-500 (June 14, 2014 - Sept. 21,2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 301-400 (Mar. 6, 2014 - June 13, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 201-300 (Nov. 26, 2013 - Mar. 5, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 101-200 (Aug. 18, 2013 - Nov. 25, 2013)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 1-100 (May 10, 2013 - Aug. 17, 2013)
https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2016/03/6th-circuit-slams-irs-treatment-of-tea-party-group.html
Comments
If the courts made a Summary Judgment for the plaintiffs and awarded Gawker sized awards to individual plantiffs, maybe (but I doubt it) there would be some change, but there's no personal accountability here for the violators of 1st Amendment (One Amendment for you Trumpkins) rights. People need to be in jail for these actions, and that's just not going to happen.
Posted by: dj | Mar 23, 2016 8:00:25 AM
The stonewalling and coverup shows that the actions at the IRS were the actions of the entire administration.
Posted by: wodun | Mar 23, 2016 8:05:16 PM