Saturday, January 24, 2015
Maine Governor Proposes Taxing Large Charities
Wall Street Journal, Maine Gov. LePage Wants to Tax Big Nonprofits:
A sweeping proposal to cut taxes for Maine families and businesses could upend one of the most widely accepted practices in the country: the property-tax exemption for nonprofit organizations.
A recent budget plan by Republican Gov. Paul LePage calling for an overhaul of individual, corporate and sales taxes also would make Maine the first state in the nation to require colleges, hospitals and other large charities to go on the property-tax rolls in their municipalities.
“It would be a stunning development,” said Daphne Kenyon, a fellow at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy in Cambridge, Mass. “I think there would be all kinds of reaction, from litigation to nonprofits’ possibly moving.”
Every state has laws that exempt churches and federally designated nonprofit groups from property taxes, although which holdings qualify can vary from place to place. Nonprofits say the special status is needed because they provide vital programs that governments often don’t.
Mr. LePage’s administration argues that the groups rely on local services, and the practice unfairly drives up property taxes for others. Churches and government-owned entities would be exempt under Mr. LePage’s proposal, which must be approved by the state Legislature.
The plan reflects a growing national debate over the nonprofit exemption, especially in the Northeast. The region relies heavily on property taxes to fund government and has a particularly high concentration of tax-exempt academic and medical institutions, according to the Lincoln Institute. ...
Mr. LePage, who just began his second term, would lower top individual and corporate income taxes, broaden the number of goods and services covered by the sales tax and offer tax credits for low-income residents. He said his plan would make Maine more competitive and attract more young families to the nation’s grayest state
https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2015/01/maine-governor-proposes-.html
Comments
When it comes to tax reform I’m generally in favor of lowering the rates and widening the base by eliminating deductions, credits and exemptions (which are usually called “loopholes” when others use them). Revoking the tax-exempt status of non-profits – or rather letting local governments make that decision – seems like a step in the right direction. I’d probably go further and do the same for churches and public entities which have shown an increasing tendency to buy up property but perhaps this can be addressed in later reforms.
Posted by: TW | Jan 26, 2015 8:24:10 AM
To the extent that those property taxes are for services like police, fire, and education, those organizations should not be exempt unless they waive the right to call the police or fire departments, and refuse to hire any person ever educated in a public school for any period of time.
Posted by: J.D. | Jan 26, 2015 8:09:09 AM
As for exempting churches, I'd only exempt land the church building is on and land that had building and functions that directly help people while not exempting things like e.g. vineyards i.e. properties that generate revenues in competition with entities that are for profit.
Posted by: Rhoda R | Jan 25, 2015 1:31:25 PM
I agree with the Governor. Also, apply the state corporate taxes to the not for profits. The so called charities are always in favour of higher tax rates. Time to bring out the petards.
Posted by: Pamphleteer | Jan 25, 2015 11:40:04 AM
Michael Perry -- that sounds good in theory, but since no government entity earns money and only acquires it through taxation of the people, it only further hurts the little guy, us.
Posted by: blue_persuasion | Jan 25, 2015 10:41:51 AM
Agree with Markj - this is LePage jerking the chains of his adversaries - maybe looking for some payments in lieu of taxes -
Posted by: bandit | Jan 25, 2015 5:41:19 AM
Given that not a few non-profits in Maine are decidedly leftish in their political affiliations, Governor LePage's proposal might be quite an interesting exercise. I sure a lot of folks in the non-profits are all for higher taxes unless, of course, those taxes also apply to them. ;)
Posted by: MarkJ | Jan 25, 2015 5:17:32 AM
One thing to consider is that property taxes, for the most part, are set at the local level. Therefore they are one of the easiest to influence -- through influencing local elected officials, replacing them, or moving. Packing up to the next town is a lot easier than the next state.
Posted by: Jenos Idanian | Jan 25, 2015 5:09:58 AM
I'd prefer that governmental property—federal, state and local—not be exempt but serve as a test bed for this idea.
Posted by: Michael W. Perry | Jan 24, 2015 12:13:10 PM
New England, especially the three northern states, and the least-churched and least charitable in the nation. Therefore the measures have the greatest chance of passing there, but also the least chance of making much money. There are a lot of church denomination camps on lakes up there.
Posted by: Assistant Village Idiot | Jan 27, 2015 12:04:09 PM