Thursday, October 30, 2014
The IRS Scandal, Day 539
Investor's Business Daily editorial: IRS Is A Unique Troublemaker Among Federal Agencies:
It's also been used as a political weapon. President Obama may owe his 2012 re-election to the IRS, which blocked the formation of groups that opposed him.
The IRS-Tea Party scandal entered Day 536 on Monday by the TaxProf blog's count, and it appears that the scandal will go on much longer without resolution.
Bob Woodward suggests that the media investigate it as it did Watergate. We laud his bravery. He's opened himself up to attacks from two vicious and unaccountable adversaries: the IRS and the mainstream media.
- Breitbart: Head of Group Targeted By IRS: Court's Dismissal Means Government Free to Violate Our Rights
- Patriot Post: A Tale of Excused Abuse at the IRS
- The IRS Scandal, Day 538 (Oct. 29, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 537 (Oct. 28, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 536 (Oct. 27, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 535 (Oct. 26, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 534 (Oct. 25, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 533 (Oct. 24, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 532 (Oct. 23, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 531 (Oct. 22, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 530 (Oct. 21, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 529 (Oct. 20, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 528 (Oct. 19, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 527 (Oct. 18, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 526 (Oct. 17, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 525 (Oct. 16, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 524 (Oct. 15, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 523 (Oct. 14, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 522 (Oct. 13, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 521 (Oct. 12, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 520 (Oct. 11, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 519 (Oct. 10, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 518 (Oct. 9, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 517 (Oct. 8, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 516 (Oct. 7, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 515 (Oct. 6, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 514 (Oct. 5, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 513 (Oct. 4, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 512 (Oct. 3, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 511 (Oct. 2, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 510 (Oct. 1, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 509 (Sept. 30, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 508 (Sept. 29, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 507 (Sept. 28, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 506 (Sept. 27, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 505 (Sept. 26, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 504 (Sept. 25, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 503 (Sept. 24, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 502 (Sept. 23, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Day 501 (Sept. 22, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 401-500 (June 14, 2014 - Sept. 21,2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 301-400 (Mar. 6, 2014 - June 13, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 201-300 (Nov. 26, 2013 - Mar. 5, 2014)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 101-200 (Aug. 18, 2013 - Nov. 25, 2013)
- The IRS Scandal, Days 1-100 (May 10, 2013 - Aug. 17, 2013)
https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2014/10/the-irs-4.html
Comments
And here's the data.
http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=irs%20scandal
The IRS scandal has been old hat since Sept. 2013.
Posted by: Baseball Fan | Oct 30, 2014 4:28:51 PM
I think the mainstream media's readership probably got bored around day 60. At day 539, whether it's important or not, it's no longer "news."
Posted by: Baseball Fan | Oct 30, 2014 4:18:50 PM
Have you noticed the mainstream media onrush to embrace Bob Woodward's remarks about investigating the IRS and dispatching their own investigative journalists and expanding coverage of the scandal? Nah, me neither, especially with critical elections less than a week away and the fact that revelations of Obama corruption would hurt the Democrats.
Posted by: Woody | Oct 30, 2014 8:32:28 AM
Let’s take a look at the statement “President Obama may owe his 2012 re-election to the IRS, which blocked the formation of groups that opposed him.” This statement is tautological and demonstrates the falsity of the right’s “reasoning” on this non-issue. Follow along. If the “groups that opposed [Pres. Obama]” were opposed to the president’s re-election, they were either going to advocate against the president’s re-election or they were not. If the latter, they were entitled to 501(c)(4) status, but would not have effected the election because they were not political advocacy groups. If the former, they were entitled to 527 status but not 501(c)(4) status because they were political advocacy groups, and the IRS acted correctly. But in neither case can it be said that the election improperly was tilted by the IRS’ action.
Posted by: Publius Novus | Oct 31, 2014 8:18:53 AM