Monday, June 16, 2014
Leiter's Top Ten Law Faculty (By Area) In Scholarly Impact, 2009-2013
Following up on Friday's post, The 10 Most-Cited Tax Faculty: Brian Leiter (Chicago) has relased on his Law School Rankings website (a member of our Law Professor Blogs Network) an updated ranking of the 10 Most-Cited U.S. Law Faculty in 11 areas of specialization, as measured by citations during the past five years (2009-2013).
Interestingly, the 14 Tax Profs listed in the 10-Most Cited Tax Faculty and the related Highly Cited Scholars Who Work Partly in Tax lists are younger than their counterparts in the 10 other areas of specializations: in tax, four are in their 40s, nine are in their 50s, and only one is in his 60s.
Rank
Tax Prof
Citations
Age
1
Michael Graetz (Columbia)
400
69
David Weisbach (Chicago)
400
50
3
Reuven Avi-Yonah (Michigan)
350
56
4
Daniel Shaviro (NYU)
340
56
5
Leandra Lederman (Indiana)
290
47
Larry Zelenak (Duke)
290
58
7
Victor Fleischer (San Diego)
280
42
8
Edward Zelinsky (Cardozo)
270
58
9
Joseph Bankman (Stanford)
250
58
Edward McCaffery (USC)
250
55
Highly Cited Scholars Who Work Partly in Tax
Louis Kaplow (Harvard)
1100
57
Brian Galle (Boston College)
310
43
Kristin Hickman (Minnesota)
310
43
Mark Gergen (UC-Berkeley)
270
57
Prior TaxProf Blog coverage:
- The Ten Most-Cited Tax Faculty (June 13, 2014)
- Phillips & Yoo: A Better Faculty Citation Rankings System (Sept. 7, 2012)
- The 18 Most-Cited Tax Faculty (May 18, 2010)
- The 15 Most-Cited Tax Faculty (Apr. 5, 2010)
- More on Faculty Citation Rankings (Nov. 28, 2007)
- The Most-Cited Tax Faculty (Nov. 16, 2007)
- Ten Most-Cited Tax Faculty (Aug. 20, 2007)
In our article, Ranking Law Schools: Using SSRN to Measure Scholarly Performance, 81 Ind. L.J. 83, 120-22 (2006), Bernie Black (Northwestern) and I examined the Top 25 tax faculty as measured by SSRN downloads, a practice I update monthly on TaxProf Blog.
https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2014/06/leiters-.html
I checked the Leiter survey again. Cass Sunstein has been cited 5000 times in the equivalent period, or significantly more than all the cited tax scholars together. Everyone in the overall top 10 has been cited more than four times as much as the most frequently cited tax scholar. I personally think the entire "rankings" concept (downloads, citations, etc.) is adolescent in nature--like saying Lady Gaga is better than Mozart--but if we are to engage it we should at least be aware of what it tells us. For tax scholars, the message is pretty clear.
Posted by: michael livingston | Jun 17, 2014 6:13:02 AM