Paul L. Caron

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Smith: May Regulations that Violate the APA Be Remanded to the IRS?

Tax Analysys Logo (2013)Patrick J. Smith (Ivins, Phillips & Barker, Washington, D.C.), May Regulations that Violate the APA Be Remanded to the IRS?, 141 Tax Notes 84 (Oct. 7, 2013):

Last year in Dominion Resources, the Federal Circuit invalidated a tax regulation in part on the basis that it violated the Administrative Procedure Act’s arbitrary and capricious standard because the IRS failed to provide an explanation for the regulation at the time it was issued. It was the first time a court of appeals invalidated a tax regulation on that basis. This article discusses a recent case comment in the Harvard Law Review contending that although many tax regulations would be vulnerable to similar challenges, large-scale invalidation would be prevented by the practice followed by some courts of remanding defective regulations to the issuing agency for corrective action while leaving them in effect. This article disputes that contention, arguing that the practice of remanding without vacating would not apply to most tax litigation because of the Anti-Injunction Act.

All Tax Analysts content is available through the LexisNexis® services.

Scholarship, Tax | Permalink


For Dominion Resources (which Mr. Smith was part of), see

Posted by: Eric Rasmusen | Oct 10, 2013 7:36:23 AM