Paul L. Caron

Monday, June 4, 2012

NLJ: Law School Innovators: Pushing the Boundaries of Traditional Legal Education and Legal Theory

LSINational Law Journal:  Law School Innovators:

The foundation of modern legal education dates to the late 1800s, when Christopher Columbus Langdell introduced the case method as dean of Harvard Law School. Law schools have tweaked their curriculum models since then. Clinics gained in popularity during the 1970s, and some law schools now take a more interdisciplinary approach. Still, "innovation" is not a term often applied to law schools. Lawyers are by nature risk-averse, and legal education has been relatively slow to change when compared with other professional programs.

That said, the pressure for change will not be denied. Comprehensive reports issued in recent years have faulted legal education for doing too little to teach ethics and professionalism. More importantly, the changing legal marketplace is putting pressure on schools to update their curricula and ­better prepare students to actually practice law. Students and prospective students are more savvy than ever about the cost of attending law school and are better informed about their post-graduation employment prospects. The American Bar Association, meanwhile, is revamping its accreditation standards to require schools to lay out what they aim to teach students.

During the past two years alone, a number of law schools have voluntarily reduced enrollment; many others have added masters of law programs or programs for nonlawyers; some have launched much more comprehensive ethics and professionalism programs emphasizing real-world business skills; still others have gotten creative about helping students land jobs.

In this special report, we highlight a few law schools, students and professors who are pushing the boundaries of traditional legal education and legal theory.

Legal Education | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NLJ: Law School Innovators: Pushing the Boundaries of Traditional Legal Education and Legal Theory:


One effort not mentioned here is the attempt to create more practical teaching materials for interested professors to use in their own classrooms. Carolina Academic Press has responded to criticisms of legal education by launching a casebook series that helps prepare students for practice by integrating the teaching of doctrine and skills, the Context and Practice Series,

My book in the series, Current Issues in Constitutional Litigation: A Context and Practice Casebook (Carolina Academic Press 2011), takes a practical approach to teaching the constitutional and § 1983 doctrines necessary to litigate 4th, 8th, and 14th Amendment claims.

Sarah Ricks

Posted by: sarah ricks | Jun 6, 2012 11:25:00 AM