Paul L. Caron
Dean


Saturday, September 17, 2011

Midwest Law & Economics Association Annual Meeting at Indiana

Indiana The two day Annual Meeting of the Midwest Law and Economics Association concludes today at Indiana-Bloomington. Papers of tax interest include:

https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2011/09/midwest-law-.html

Scholarship, Tax, Tax Conferences | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef014e8b9ebee9970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Midwest Law & Economics Association Annual Meeting at Indiana:

Comments

See my comment on critical tax, above.

Posted by: mike livingston | Sep 17, 2011 5:23:51 AM

Sorry, Mike-- I don't mean to be mean-- but your misunderstanding is just too funny not to repeat here. Your post on critical tax said:
"Critical tax started out as an inspiring movement with a lot to say. Unfortunately, it has degenerated into its own narrow ideology. Papers like this provide comfort to people who already agree with them, but their rather slavish political correctness, and (in most cases) lack of intellectual rigor, suggest that their real world influence is limited."

This conference was practical as can be, and totally lacked a unifying political ideology. Just look at the titles! And to quote Scalia from the paper I presented:

"The constitutional work can be dull, too, but it’s not like the tax code. Philosopher-kings do not read the Internal Revenue Code, believe me."

It reminds me of something funny that happened to me while I was a visitor at Yale Law. There was a reception in the faculty lounge for a conference-- I think it was critical race theory, or maybe just a talk by Mari Matsuda, because she was there. I was in a group with her sipping our wine and talking in general terms about the Supreme Court. Everybody was complaining how terribly biased and ideologically corrupt the Supreme Court was. I nodded along, but I realized that though I was in full agreement with the words that were said, we were in total disagreement over which of the things the Court did were good and which were bad. It would have been obtrusive for me to proclaim my conservatism, yet I did feel awkward.

Posted by: Eric Rasmusen | Sep 18, 2011 9:13:33 PM

See my response to Mike Livingston's comment above.

Posted by: Darryll Jones | Sep 19, 2011 9:30:08 AM