Tuesday, May 18, 2010
The 18 Most-Cited Tax Faculty
Brian Leiter (Chicago) has finalized his ranking of the Highest Impact Faculty in 13 Areas of Specialization, including tax, as measured by citations during the past five years (Jan. 1, 2005 - Jan. 15, 2010):
Rank
Tax Prof
Citations
Age
1
Michael Graetz (Yale)
370
66
2
Daniel Shaviro (NYU)
310
53
3
David Weisbach (Chicago)
300
47
4
Edward McCaffery (USC)
280
52
5
Reuven Avi-Yonah (Michigan)
260
53
Edward Zelinsky (Cardozo)
260
60
7
Lawrence Zelenak (Duke)
240
55
8
Joseph Bankman (Stanford)
230
55
9
Victor Fleischer (Colorado)
200
39
Leandra Lederman (Indiana)
200
44
Nancy Staudt (Northwestern)
200
47
12
Marjorie Kornhauser (Arizona St.)
190
63
13
Calvin Johnson (Texas)
180
66
Deborah Schenk (NYU)
180
63
15
David Schizer (Columbia)
170
42
16
Howard Abrams (Emory)
160
55
Anne Alstott (Harvard)
160
47
Thomas Griffith (USC)
160
61
Highly-cited scholars whose cites are not exclusively in this area:
- Louis Kaplow (Harvard) (age 54), 970 citations
- Kristin Hickman (Minnesota) (age 40), 230 citations
- Mark Gergen (UC-Berkeley) (age 54), 210 citations
- Kyle Logue (Michigan) (age 45), 180 citations
In our article, Pursuing a Tax LLM Degree: Where?, Jennifer M. Kowal (Loyola-L.A.), Katherine Pratt (Loyola-L.A.), Theodore P. Seto (Loyola-L.A.) and I used a variation of Leiter's methodology in conducting a citation count study of the faculty in the thirteen graduate tax programs ranked at least once in the U.S. News tax rankings over the past four years (pp. 28-29):
Rank
Graduate Tax Program Faculty
Citations
1
NYU
1917
2
Florida
1181
3
Georgetown
861
4
Miami
799
5
Northwestern
667
6
Boston University
614
7
Loyola-L.A.
475
8
San Diego
377
9
Villanova
177
10
SMU
139
11
Chapman
112
12
U. Washington
75
13
Denver
42
Prior TaxProf Blog coverage:
- The 15 Most-Cited Tax Faculty (Apr. 5, 2010)
- More on Faculty Citation Rankings (Nov. 28, 2007)
- The Most-Cited Tax Faculty (Nov. 16, 2007)
- Ten Most-Cited Tax Faculty (Aug. 20, 2007)
In our article, Ranking Law Schools: Using SSRN to Measure Scholarly Performance, 81 Ind. L.J. 83, 120-22 (2006), Bernie Black (Northwestern) and I examined the Top 25 tax faculty as measured by SSRN downloads, a practice I update monthly on TaxProf Blog.
https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2010/05/the-18.html
Is having your age displayed the price of "glory" I mean "vanity" I mean "Achievement" I mean "How many people can I get to cite me if I promise to cite them in a race to the bottom--I mean top of the charts"
Yes. Yes, it is.
Seriously, though, I think a stat on "years as a full-time prof" is likely more valuable than "age" and perhaps "average number of citations per year as a prof" is perhaps more important that gross cite counts.
I think you could pick up Moneyball and get some "real" statistics or measurement of worth other than gross cite count and age. Certainly the Moneyball guys would look at more than that to determine who is "really" valuable and who's stats just make them "look" valuable. But beware of the critical eye. The critical usually gets a lot of backlash, I mean criticism, itself.
Posted by: tax guy | May 18, 2010 7:47:21 PM