Paul L. Caron

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Waggoner: A Carbon Tax is Better Than Cap and Trade

Michael Waggoner (Colorado) has posted The House Erred: A Carbon Tax is Better Than Cap and Trade, 124 Tax Notes 1257 (Sept. 21, 2009), on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

The House in June approved a cap-and-trade system to control greenhouse gases (GHGs) and to reduce the risks of climate change. Although cap and trade has political momentum, a carbon tax is preferable because:

  1. A carbon tax would work better in international commerce and would more effectively encourage the developing nations to join the fight against climate change.
  2. Cap and trade is not the successfully tested environmental remedy some believe.
  3. Cap and trade would effectively be a sales tax that would likely slow growth and be more regressive than a carbon tax.
  4. Cap and trade would present more politics as usual: Very long and complicated bills are enacted on very short notice, increasing the risk that, at best, there will be secret rewards for friends and punishments for foes, and at worst, bribery or extortion as votes are exchanged for quid pro quo campaign contributions. This process enriches the political classes of office holders, political fundraisers, campaign advisers, and public relations people. It also enriches the litigation classes of lawyers, expert witnesses, and consultants. This process harms the rest of society.

Scholarship, Tax | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Waggoner: A Carbon Tax is Better Than Cap and Trade:


Cap and Trade only rewards Wall Street traders. One of the most succinct analysis' of this was done by (of all people) Matt Taibbi from Rolling Stone.

Posted by: Anonymous | Dec 13, 2009 2:37:16 PM