TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron, Dean
Pepperdine University School of Law

Monday, September 28, 2009

Kahn: Sotomayor Was Wrong in Rudkin Testamentary Trust/Knight

Douglas A. Kahn (Michigan) has posted Rudkin Testamentary Trust -- A Response to Prof. Cohen, 124 Tax Notes 1263 (Sept. 21, 2009), on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

In the August 3 issue of Tax Notes,  Professor Stephen Cohen [Georgetown)] wrote an article about Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s opinions in three tax cases [Judge Sonia Sotomayor's Tax Opinions, 124 Tax Notes 474 (Aug. 3, 2009),]. Of those three cases, only the opinion she wrote in William L. Rudkin Testamentary Trust v. Commissioner is worthy of comment. Although the Second Circuit’s decision in that case was affirmed by the Supreme Court under the name Knight v. Commissioner, the construction of the critical statutory language that Justice Sotomayor adopted was rejected and criticized by Chief Justice Roberts, writing for a unanimous court. Cohen concluded that Justice Sotomayor’s construction of the statutory language is ‘‘at least as valid as, and probably preferable to, the construction adopted by the Supreme Court’’ and that Chief Justice Roberts’s criticism of Justice Sotomayor’s rationale is ‘‘logically flawed.’’ Cohen also said that Chief Justice Roberts’s criticism of Justice Sotomayor’s opinion is ‘‘unpersuasive and overstated.’’ In my view, the construction adopted by Justice Sotomayor was incorrect, and Chief Justice Roberts’s criticism was persuasive and accurately stated. Moreover, based on policy considerations, a plausible case can be made that the courts could have construed the statute differently, resulting in a decision for the taxpayer.

https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2009/09/kahn-sotomayor-.html

Scholarship, Tax | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef0120a59fcfb6970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Kahn: Sotomayor Was Wrong in Rudkin Testamentary Trust/Knight:

Comments