Paul L. CaronDean
Thursday, October 30, 2008
By Paul Caron
The Federal Circuit today issued its long awaited decision in In re Bilski, No. 2007-1130 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 30, 2008), rejecting the patentability test (State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, 149 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1998)) which was the linchpin in the spate of tax strategy patents issued recently. For coverage of the court's 132-page opinion, see Patently-O. For prior TaxProf Blog coverage, see AICPA Asks CAFC to Deny Tax Strategy Patents (4/14/08). (Hat Tip: David Kirk.)
New Cases | Permalink
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Federal Circuit Overrules Tax Strategy Patent Linchpin:
» The end of tax strategy patents? from Roth & Company, P.C.
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a decision that may signal the end of tax strategy patents. The... [Read More]
Tracked on Nov 2, 2008 1:45:23 PM
The biggest winners from the Bilski decision might be technology consultants. As a patent agent specializing in tax patents, one of the strategies I’ve emphasized for financial professionals seeking a patent is for them to spend a little extra money to hire a technology consultant (e.g. actuary, IT professional, etc.) to spec out the technical implementation of their inventions. We then include those specifications in the patent application with the tech consultant being listed as a coinventor.
The strategy has been very successful and with Bilski taking such a strong stand on the importance of tying a new financial invention to a “particular machine”, it should be even more so in the future.
Posted by: Mark Nowotarski | Nov 1, 2008 4:35:07 AM
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support TaxProf Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.