Paul L. Caron

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

WSJ: Michigan's Tax Warning

Editorial in today's Wall Street Journal:  Granholm's Tax Warning:

It's no fun to kick a state when it's down – especially when the local politicians are doing a fine job of it – but the latest news of Michigan's deepening budget woe is a national warning of what happens when you raise taxes in a weak economy.

Officials in Lansing reported this month that the state faces a revenue shortfall between $350 million and $550 million next budget year. This is a major embarrassment for Governor Jennifer Granholm, the second-term Democrat who shut down the state government last year until the Legislature approved Michigan's biggest tax hike in a generation. Her tax plan raised the state income tax rate to 4.35% from 3.9%, and increased the state's tax on gross business receipts by 22%. Ms. Granholm argued that these new taxes would raise some $1.3 billion in new revenue that could be "invested" in social spending and new businesses and lead to a Michigan renaissance.

Not quite. Six months later one-third of the expected revenues have vanished as the state's economy continues to struggle. Income tax collections are falling behind estimates, as are property tax receipts and those from the state's transaction tax on home sales. Michigan is now in the 18th month of a state-wide recession, and the unemployment rate of 6.9% remains far above the national rate of 5%

News | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference WSJ: Michigan's Tax Warning:

» Evidence: Higher tax rates DO NOT EQUAL more tax revenue! from taxmonkey: Where "Cash is King"
Today's WSJ editorial Michigan in trouble: Granholm's Tax Warning Governments need to compete for customers (taxpayers). If they raise the cost without increasing (perceived) benefits then their customers (taxpayers) may leave, sometimes by the masses.... [Read More]

Tracked on May 28, 2008 7:43:56 PM


Fact check for the WSJ: the Dillon recall drive is likely set to fail, because the (Republican) Secretary of State disqualified over half of the signatures from the get-go.

Posted by: anon | May 28, 2008 11:26:52 AM