TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron, Dean
Pepperdine University School of Law

Thursday, October 19, 2006

Is D.C. Circuit Leaning Toward Granting Rehearing En Banc in Murphy?

In response to the Government's October 5 petition for rehearing en banc in Murphy v. United States, 460 F.3d 79 (D.C. Cir. 8/22/06), the D.C. Circuit on October 11 ordered that Murphy file a response by October 26 and stated that the court would not permit the Government to file a reply:

ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that, within 15 days of the date of this order, appellants file a response to the petition for rehearing en banc, not to exceed 15 pages. Absent further order of the court, the court will not accept a reply to the response.

This suggests that the D.C. Circuit may be considering granting the the petitiion, as Rule 40(a)(3) provides:

(3) Answer. Unless the court requests, no answer to a petition for panel rehearing is permitted. But ordinarily rehearing will not be granted in the absence of such a request.

https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2006/10/is_dc_circuit_l.html

New Cases | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef00d8346109fc69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is D.C. Circuit Leaning Toward Granting Rehearing En Banc in Murphy?:

» MURPHY TO GET FULL-PANEL REHEARING? from Roth & Company, P.C.
The TaxProf thinks that the full Federal Circuit Court of Appeals may be leaning towards a rehearing of the Murphy... [Read More]

Tracked on Oct 20, 2006 5:28:19 AM

Comments