Paul L. Caron

Friday, August 25, 2006

Murphy: Wrong on Law, Right on Policy?

Stephen Cohen (Georgetown) previously argued in this space:

There may be doubtful authority to declare an income tax provision unconstitutional on policy grounds as did the D.C. Circuit in Murphy v. United States, No. 03cv02414 (D.C. Cir. 8/22/06). However, there is a strong argument that in principle, for policy reasons, the damages in Murphy should not constitute income. My co-author and I, Laura Sager of NYU, fleshed out that argument in Discrimination Against Damages for Unlawful Discrimination, 35 Harv. J. Legis. 447 (1998). Thus, the Murphy court may have been wrong on the law, but I think they are right on the policy issue.

Stephen has graciously agreed to share with the broader tax community the relevant portions of the article here.

New Cases, Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Murphy: Wrong on Law, Right on Policy?: