Paul L. Caron
Dean





Tuesday, April 26, 2005

WSJ on Distribution of Tax Burden

Today's Wall Street Journal has an interesting editorial, Who Pays What.  The conclusion:

An IRS study by a trio of tax wonks shows that, even after including Social Security taxes, the overall tax burden grew more progressive from 1979 to 1999. And while that burden became a tad less progressive after the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003, the rich and upper middle class continued to pay far and away the bulk of U.S. taxes.

The study in question, by Michael Strudler and Tom Petska of the IRS and Ryan Petska of Ernst and Young, reports this data:

Share of Taxes (Income & Social Security) Paid By Income Classes

Category of Earners

1979

1999

1999 (at 2003 rates)

Top .1%

5.06%

11.05%

9.52%

Top 5%

14.69%

16.84%

17.75%

Top 20%

58.28%

68.17%

67.47%

Bottom 20%

1.22%

0.63%

0.65%

https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2005/04/wsj_on_distribu.html

News | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef00d8345745df69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference WSJ on Distribution of Tax Burden:

» How progressive is the income tax? from The Glittering Eye
Instapundit links to this post from TaxProf Blog, which has a very tidy chart illustrating that the Top .1 % of earners pays quite a high proportion of the total tax bill, the Top 5%, a substantial proportion of the... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 26, 2005 1:31:44 PM

» How progressive is the income tax? from The Glittering Eye
Instapundit links to this post from TaxProf Blog, which has a very tidy table illustrating that the Top .1 % of earners pays quite a high proportion of the total tax bill, the Top 5%, a substantial proportion of the... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 26, 2005 1:33:11 PM

» Five Worst Traits About Taxes from Coyote Blog
Generally, in any discussion of taxes, I focus on the foundations of property rights, to argue that taxation is no different than stealing. [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 26, 2005 2:10:04 PM

» The rich... getting soaked! from Generic Confusion
Instapundit links to this post by TaxProfBlog, which links to a Wall Street Journal editorial that shows that, from 1979 to 1999, the rich paid a greater share of federal taxes, considering both regressive Social Security and Medicare taxes and progr... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 26, 2005 7:51:05 PM

» Update: More on Taxes and Class Warfare from Coyote Blog
Earlier this week I posted my thoughts on taxation, which included thoughts on taxation and class warfare and linked this recent WSJ editorial on tax shares paid by the rich. Today, Kevin Drum rebuts the WSJ editorial with a post [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 27, 2005 11:52:58 AM

» Update: More on Taxes and Class Warfare from Coyote Blog
Earlier this week I posted my thoughts on taxation, which included thoughts on taxation and class warfare and linked this recent WSJ editorial on tax shares paid by the rich. Today, Kevin Drum rebuts the WSJ editorial with a post [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 27, 2005 11:55:24 AM

» US Taxes Progressive? Who Pays What from Seeker Blog
This 26 April WSJ piece updates the profile of the impact of US federal income and social security taxes. Many thanks to TaxProf Blog for the analysis! The Bush administration "tax cuts for the rich" have had little impact on reducing the tax burden... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 27, 2005 8:33:07 PM

» TaxProf Blog: WSJ on Distribution of Tax Burden from Catfish 'n Cod v.2.0
Insty's odd comment is "GEORGE W. BUSH — CLOSET DEMOCRAT?", which is kind of odd, considering that the data presented are from 1979 and 1999. I don't think W was setting tax policy then... In fairness, though, we should look at the entire data set rath... [Read More]

Tracked on May 2, 2005 12:00:15 PM