Paul L. Caron
Dean




Monday, April 28, 2025

Hickman Presents Delay, Politics, And Expertise In OIRA Tax Review Today At Columbia

Kristin Hickman (Minnesota; Google Scholar) presents Delay, Politics, and Expertise in OIRA Tax Review, 44 Va. Tax Rev. __ (2025) (with Bridget C.E. Dooling (Ohio State; Google Scholar)) at Columbia today as part of its Davis Polk & Wardwell Tax Policy Colloquium hosted by Michael Love:

Kristin HickmanAmong the many changes to federal policy undertaken by the second Trump Administration, a lesser-known change is the reinstatement of centralized review of tax regulations by the Office of Information of Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). Reports suggest that OIRA review for regulations issued by independent agencies may be next.

For many years, most tax regulations were exempt from OIRA review. That changed in the first Trump Administration when the Treasury Department (Treasury) and OIRA signed a memorandum of agreement bringing more tax regulations within OIRA’s oversight sphere. In the Biden administration, Treasury and OIRA reversed course, this time clearly and unequivocally exempting all tax regulations without exception. Now the script has flipped again, as a new Trump executive order has reinstated OIRA review of tax regulations.

Continue reading

April 28, 2025 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship, Tax Workshops | Permalink

Pressure Grows On California Bar To Switch To NCBE For July Exam Following February Exam Debacle

Following up on Saturday's post, California Supreme Court Demands Answers From State Bar On Its Use Of AI In Preparing Bar Exam Questions:  Los Angeles Times, Pressure Grows on California State Bar to Revert to National Exam Format in July After Botched Exam:

California Bar (2021)An influential California legislator is pressuring the State Bar of California to ditch its new multiple-choice questions after a February bar exam debacle and revert to the traditional test format in July.

“Given the catastrophe of the February bar, I think that going back to the methods that have been used for the last 50 years — until we can adequately test what new methods may be employed — is the appropriate way to go,” Sen. Thomas J. Umberg, chair of the state Senate Judiciary Committee, told The Times.

Thousands of test takers seeking to practice law in California typically take the two-day bar exam in July. Reverting to the national system by the National Conference of Bar Examiners, which California has used since 1972, would be a major retreat for the embattled State Bar. Its new exam was rolled out this year as a cost-cutting measure and “historic agreement” that would offer test takers the choice of remote testing.

Continue reading

April 28, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink

Legal Ed News Roundup

Jonathan Choi Leaves USC For Washington University

Jonathan Choi (USCGoogle Scholar) has accepted a lateral offer from Washington University effective Spring 2026:

Jonathan choiJonathan H. Choi is a professor of law at USC Gould School of Law. He specializes in law and artificial intelligence (applying natural language processing to study legal issues), tax law and statutory interpretation. His work has appeared in the New York University Law Review, the Stanford Law Review, the Yale Journal on Regulation and the Yale Law Journal, among others. His work has been covered by a wide variety of news outlets, including ABC NewsBloombergCBS NewsCNN, the Daily MailFox NewsNBC Nightly News, the New YorkerReuters, the Star Tribune, and the Washington Post.

Choi graduated summa cum laude from Dartmouth College, with a triple major in computer science, economics and philosophy and earned high honors for his computer science thesis. He earned a JD at the Yale Law School, where he was the executive bluebook editor of the Yale Law Journal and a founding co-director of the Yale Journal on Regulation Online. Before entering academia, he practiced tax law at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz in New York. He previously taught at the University of Minnesota Law School.

His recent publications include:

Continue reading

April 28, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax News, Tax Prof Moves | Permalink

Law School Rankings By First-Time Bar Passage Rate (2024)

Following up on my previous post, New ABA Bar Data: Pass Rate Increased 3 Percentage Points For First-Time Takers; 6 Law Schools Fell Short of 75% Accreditation Threshold:  here is the ranking of law schools in the Calendar Year 2024 First-Time Takers Bar Pass Data from the ABA's spreadsheet. The ranking uses an adjusted pass rate that is the sum of the school pass rate (including alternative pathways) and the difference between that school pass rate and average state pass rate, per the current U.S. News methodology: "first-time test-takers' weighted bar passage rates among all jurisdictions, or states, then added or subtracted the average percentage point difference between those rates and the weighted state average among ABA accredited schools' first-time test-takers in the corresponding jurisdictions").

Rank School Average State Pass Rate School Pass Rate (Incl. Diploma Privilege) Total Difference Adjusted Pass Rate
1 Chicago 81.49% 97.42% 15.93% 113.35%
2 Harvard 83.44% 97.86% 14.42% 112.28%
3 Belmont 77.95% 95.00% 17.05% 112.05%
4 Duke 82.94% 97.48% 14.54% 112.02%
5 Stanford 81.40% 96.50% 15.10% 111.60%
6 Michigan 80.44% 95.57% 15.13% 110.70%
7 Texas A&M 81.39% 95.98% 14.59% 110.57%
8 Penn 82.93% 96.70% 13.77% 110.47%
9 Texas 81.57% 95.62% 14.05% 109.67%
10 UCLA 78.85% 94.23% 15.38% 109.61%
11 Yale 83.57% 96.50% 12.93% 109.43%
12 USC 78.74% 94.01% 15.27% 109.28%
13 NYU 85.02% 96.72% 11.70% 108.42%
14 Baylor 81.44% 94.92% 13.48% 108.40%
15 Cornell 84.73% 96.41% 11.68% 108.09%
16 Illinois 79.05% 93.56% 14.51% 108.07%
17 Vanderbilt 81.05% 94.55% 13.46% 108.01%
18 Virginia 82.83% 94.98% 12.15% 107.13%
19 Columbia 84.98% 95.85% 10.87% 106.72%
20 Washington Univ. 81.37% 93.57% 12.20% 105.77%
21 Tennessee 78.49% 91.94% 13.45% 105.39%
22 North Carolina 79.60% 92.27% 12.67% 104.94%
23 Minnesota 83.36% 94.09% 10.73% 104.82%
24 Utah 84.88% 94.74% 9.86% 104.60%
25 Notre Dame 79.83% 92.15% 12.32% 104.47%
26 Boston College 83.55% 93.82% 10.27% 104.09%
27 Florida Int'l 72.91% 88.34% 15.43% 103.77%
28 Kansas 80.59% 92.17% 11.58% 103.75%
29 Ohio State 80.32% 91.95% 11.63% 103.58%
30 Alabama 80.51% 92.00% 11.49% 103.49%
31 Georgetown 83.29% 93.05% 9.76% 102.81%
32 Northwestern 81.00% 91.80% 10.80% 102.60%
33 UC-Berkeley 79.91% 91.16% 11.25% 102.41%
34 Villanova 80.14% 91.26% 11.12% 102.38%
35 Florida 75.20% 88.55% 13.35% 101.90%
36 Boston Univ. 83.30% 92.28% 8.98% 101.26%
37 Univ. of Washington 82.21% 91.72% 9.51% 101.23%
38 Florida State 73.35% 87.22% 13.87% 101.09%
39 Georgia 79.72% 90.37% 10.65% 101.02%
40 Wisconsin 78.72% 99.61% 1.28% 100.89%
41 South Texas 81.42% 91.13% 9.71% 100.84%
41 Temple 79.72% 90.28% 10.56% 100.84%
43 Fordham 85.77% 92.98% 7.21% 100.19%
44 UC-Davis 77.78% 88.98% 11.16% 100.14%
45 Arizona State 75.03% 87.54% 12.51% 100.05%
46 Georgia State 79.87% 89.95% 10.08% 100.03%
47 Iowa 82.10% 90.96% 8.86% 99.82%
48 Wayne State 72.93% 86.05% 13.12% 99.17%
49 SMU 81.36% 90.20% 8.84% 99.04%
50 Regent 77.60% 88.18% 10.58% 98.76%

Continue reading

April 28, 2025 in Law School Rankings, Legal Ed Rankings, Legal Education | Permalink

Pervasive Pattern Of Racial Discrimination At Harvard Law Review

Washington Free Beacon (Aaron Sibarium), Internal Documents Reveal Pervasive Pattern of Racial Discrimination at Harvard Law Review:

HarvardWill this law review article "promote DEI values"? Does it cite scholars from "underrepresented groups"? Will it have "any foreseeable impact in enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion"? And why did one team of editors solicit "only white, male authors"?

Those are some of the questions that editors at the Harvard Law Review asked in internal documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. The documents, which span more than four years and have not been previously reported, include article evaluations, training materials, and data on the race and gender of journal authors. They reveal a pattern of pervasive race discrimination at the nation’s top law journal and threaten to plunge Harvard, already at war with the federal government, into even deeper crisis.

Continue reading

April 28, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Ed Scholarship, Legal Education | Permalink

Taxation, Lactation, And Validation: The Symbolic Power Of Tax Law To Legitimize Breast Milk Expression

Elizabeth A. Hoffmann (Purdue; Google Scholar), Taxation, Lactation, and Validation: The Symbolic Power of Tax Law to Legitimize Breast Milk Expression, 49 Law & Soc. Inquiry 1327 (2024):

Law & Social Inquiry (2025)In 2011, the Internal Revenue Service reversed a previous regulation that excluded lactation supplies, including breast pumps, from medical care tax benefits. This policy change was met with joy by some working mothers. Often torn between family needs and workplace duties, these lactating employees struggled with trying to be a “good worker” and a “good mother.” They saw the new tax law as validation of their efforts to express milk at work and legitimation for the accommodations they required. They felt that even an area of law as technical and complex as tax law could recognize their commitment to combining breastfeeding and employment. However, the women recognized that the law only facilitated greater ability to lactate but not more time with their babies, which they greatly wanted. Indeed, this article asks if breast pumps and supplies would even be an issue for many women if the United States provided women with the more extensive maternity leave that workers in other developed countries receive.

Continue reading

April 28, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink

TaxProf Blog Weekend Roundup

Sunday, April 27, 2025

Pope Francis's Legacy

New York Times Op-Ed:  Francis and the End of the Imperial Papacy, by Ross Douthat (Author, Believe: Why Everyone Should Be Religious (2025):

Pope FrancisPope Francis, who passed to his reward on the morning after Easter at age 88, was a version of the liberal pope that many Catholics had earnestly desired all through the long reign of John Paul II and the shorter one of Benedict XVI — a man whose worldview was shaped and defined by the Second Vatican Council and whose pontificate sought a renewal of its revolution, a further great modernization of the Catholic Church.

In one way, at least, he succeeded. For generations, modernizers lamented the outsize power of the papacy, the anachronism of a monarchical authority in a democratic age, the way the concept of papal infallibility froze Catholic debates even as the world rushed forward. In theory Francis shared those concerns, promising a more collegial and horizontally oriented church, more synodal, in the jargon of the Catholic bureaucracy. In practice he often used his power in the same way as his predecessors, to police and suppress deviations from his authority — except that this time the targets were dissenting conservatives and traditionalists instead of progressives and modernizers.

But just by creating that novel form of conflict, in which Catholics who had been accustomed to being on the same side as the Vatican found themselves suddenly crosswise from papal authority, Francis helped to demystify his office’s authority and undermine its most imposing claims.

Continue reading

April 27, 2025 in Faith, Legal Education | Permalink

How JD Vance, A ‘Baby Catholic,’ Stumbled Into A Clash With The Pope

Washington Post, How JD Vance, a ‘Baby Catholic,’ Stumbled into a Clash With the Pope:

Washngton Post Logo (2023)The first Catholic convert elected to the vice presidency has provoked an extraordinary string of conflicts within the church he joined six years ago.

Only three Catholics have won the presidency or vice presidency. For the first two, Democrats John F. Kennedy and Joe Biden, faith was a muted note in their public lives — a source of pride to millions of American Catholics but rarely invoked as a direct influence on policy.

The third, Vice President JD Vance, a Republican, has launched his current career as the nation’s most prominent elected Catholic in a very different way. In less than three months, Vance has made a string of unusual forays into the fraught borderland between religion and politics, castigating the hierarchy of his own church and defending President Donald Trump’s “America First” nationalism through appeals to ancient Christian texts.

Vance’s pronouncements have divided his co-religionists and inflamed long-smoldering divisions within the church. In February, Pope Francis issued a remarkable letter to U.S. bishops that included a rebuke of Vance’s public theologizing. But the vice president has equally staunch defenders among conservative American Catholics who have repeatedly criticized the current papacy.

Continue reading

April 27, 2025 in Faith, Legal Education | Permalink

‘A Citizen of Heaven And Harvard’: Honoring The Life And Ongoing Impact Of Bill Stuntz

Following up on my previous posts:

Stuntz

Harvard Law Today, ‘A Citizen of Heaven and Harvard’: Honoring the Life and Ongoing Impact of William J. Stuntz:

For William J. Stuntz, the law and religion were inseparable.

At a recent gathering to honor the late Harvard professor and influential scholar on criminal law and procedure, who wrote extensively on Christianity and legal matters, Jack Goldsmith recalled how his longtime friend and colleague infused his life and work with a kindness and care inspired by his strongly held evangelical Christian beliefs.

Stuntz joined the Law School faculty in 2000 and was named the Henry J. Friendly Professor of Law in 2007. He died in 2011 at age of 52 after a long battle with cancer, but his insights and scholarship involving Christian legal theory, his groundbreaking contributions to the fields of criminal law and procedure, and his influence as a gifted mentor, giving friend, and gracious colleague live on at Harvard and beyond.

Continue reading

April 27, 2025 in Faith, Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink

Three Law & Religion Articles

Anton Sorkin (Director of Law Student Ministries, Christian Legal Society), Riding the Second Wave: Three Articles That Speak to the Mission & Purpose of Institute for Christian Legal Studies:

ICLS2Throughout my work, I run across countless excellent articles that speak to the underlying richness of the law and religion tradition that feed into my work with students and attorneys alike. Articles that challenge the very foundation of our sense of self as a religious nation and the role of Christianity in shaping law and politics. Since last summer, many of these articles have made their way onto the Cross & Gavel Podcast as I sought to engage the authors in the quality of their ideas and bring to attention their work on a more popular level.

That is my aim here today, not only because of my recent assent to the directorship of the Institute for Christian Legal Studies (ICLS) at Christian Legal Society. But, more fundamentally, because this work has been captured well by three articles that strengthen the fibers of what ICLS strives to become in the years ahead. ...

[M]y focus here is to highlight three recent articles that speak to the heart of what ICLS hopes to achieve in the coming years!

Continue reading

April 27, 2025 in Faith, Legal Education | Permalink

Pepperdine Caruso Law 3L Commissioning Service

Commissioning service

We hosted our 13th annual 3L Commissioning Service at Pepperdine Caruso Law last week. Like many of the best things at our school, it is the brainchild of a student. In 2012, 2L Raija Churchill proposed that the last Wednesday night Dean's Bible study of the year model the Great Commission (Matthew 28:16-20) as a send-off for our graduating 3Ls.

I was honored to give a gift to our 3Ls to encourage them to live the lives that God has called them to after they graduate: a paperweight to keep on their desks to remind them (on the top) of their time at Pepperdine Caruso Law and (on the bottom) a single word — the most powerful word that Jesus talked about and modeled for us — forgiveness. I shared several of the forgiveness stories I have chronicled on this blog, including this, this, thisthis, this, this, this, this, this, and this.

Commissioning gift

The highlight of the evening was when our faculty and staff spoke words of life over each of the graduating 3Ls (kudos to Tyler Clark (JD ’22) for beginning this wonderful tradition):

Words of life

My wife Courtney closed the evening with a powerful commissioning prayer for the 3Ls:

Continue reading

April 27, 2025 in Faith, Legal Education, Pepperdine Legal Ed | Permalink

The Top Five New Tax Papers

There is a bit of movement in this week's list of the Top 5 Recent Tax Paper Downloads, with a new paper debuting on the list at #3.  The #1 paper is #322 among 11,944 tax papers in all-time downloads.

  1. SSRN Logo (2018)[1,176 Downloads]  Tax Fairness: Reconceptualising Taxation and Inequalities, by Rita de la Feria (Leeds; Google Scholar)
  2. [342 Downloads]  Global Tax Wars in the Digital Era, by Assaf Harpaz (Georgia; Google Scholar) (reviewed by Mirit Eyal-Cohen (Alabama; Google Scholar) here)
  3. [288 Downloads]  Global Tax Decluttering, by Shu-Yi Oei (Duke; Google Scholar) & Diane Ring (Boston College; Google Scholar)
  4. [280 Downloads]  From Relic to Relevance, The Resurgence of Tariffs, by Reuven Avi-Yonah (Michigan; Google Scholar), Doron Narotzki (Akron; Google Scholar) & Tamir Shanan College of Management)
  5. [269 Downloads]  You Play, You Pay! Mobility, Territory, And Exclusive Source Taxation In The 21st Century, by Yariv Brauner (Florida; Google Scholar) (reviewed by Blaine Saito (Ohio State; Google Scholar) here)

Editor's Note:  If you would like to receive a daily email with links to tax posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here.

April 27, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Scholarship, Top 5 Downloads | Permalink

Saturday, April 26, 2025

This Week's Ten Most Popular TaxProf Blog Posts

Top Ten 2Legal Education:

  1. U.S. News, 2025-26 Law Specialty Rankings
    1. Legal Writing
    2. Trial Advocacy
    3. Omnibus Specialty Rankings
    4. Omnibus Specialty Rankings v. Overall Rankings
  2. Paul Caron (Dean, Pepperdine), Law Schools That Boycotted The U.S. News Rankings
  3. Los Angeles Times, California Bar Allowed Non-Lawyers To Use AI To Draft February Exam Questions, Will Ask Supreme Court To Lower Cut Score
  4. Matthew Sag (Emory), Forward Looking Academic Impact Rankings For U.S. Law Schools
  5. ABA, Class Of 2024 Jobs Data: ‘Maximum Credit’ Jobs Rate Rises To 89.7%, Up From 88.0% Last Year
  6. GQ, The Economy Is Frightening. Law School Won’t Save You.
  7. White House, Trump Executive Order Targets College (And Law School) Accreditors (Including ABA), Blames DEI For Low Standards And Poor Student Outcomes
  8. Reuters, Nearly All Elite Law Schools Move Up Summer Associate Job Interviews To May And June
  9. Anton Sorkin (Christian Legal Society), Are Faith-Based Law Schools Fairly Ranked By U.S. News?
  10. Law.com, A Growing Chorus Of Law School Deans And Faculty Are Speaking Out Against Trump’s Threat To The Rule Of Law

Editor's Note:  If you would like to receive a daily email with links to legal education posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here.

Tax:

  1. The Atlantic (Conor Clarke, Washington University), Bob Jones And The Conservative Case For Not Revoking Harvard's Tax Exemption
  2. Blaine Saito (Ohio State), Review Of Mobility, Territory, And Exclusive Source Taxation By Yariv Brauner (Florida)
  3. Tracey Roberts (Cumberland), The Tax Trench Deepens
  4. Wisconsin Law School, 28th Annual Critical Tax Conference
  5. Paul Caron (Dean, Pepperdine), Tax Policy In The Trump Administration
  6. Ursula Ramsey (North Carolina), The Professional Employer Organization Regulatory Regime
  7. Alex Raskolnikov (Columbia), Taxing The Ten Percent
  8. SSRN, Tax Professor Rankings
  9. Conor Clarke (Washington University), Presentation Of Apportioned Direct Taxes At Missouri
  10. Harold Holzer (Hunter College), The First IRS Commissioner: ‘The Most Consequential Public Figure Americans Have Never Heard Of’

Editor's Note:  If you would like to receive a daily email with links to tax posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here.

Faith:

  1. Anton Sorkin (Christian Legal Society), Are Faith-Based Law Schools Fairly Ranked By U.S. News?
  2. Christianity Today (Esau McCaulley, Wheaton College), This Palm Sunday, Ponder Donkeys, Not Palm Branches
  3. New York Times (Elizabeth Dias & Ruth Graham), White House Of Worship: Christian Prayer Rings Out Under Trump
  4. Jennifer Lee Koh (Pepperdine), Christian Lawyers In The Public Interest And Outside The Political Right
  5. New York Times (Ross Douthat), Can The Jesus Of History Support The Christ Of Faith?
    Christianity Today (Tish Harrison Warren), The Epic Jesus Follower Fail: The Cringe-Worthy Subplot Of Holy Week Underscores The Truth Of The Gospel

Editor's Note:  If you would like to receive a weekly email each Sunday with links to faith posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here

April 26, 2025 in About This Blog, Faith, Legal Education, Tax, Weekly Top 10 TaxProf Blog Posts | Permalink

The Seven Essential Law School Simulation Courses

Mitch Zamoff (Minnesota; Google Scholar), The Seven Essential Law School Simulation Courses , 2024 Utah L. Rev. 997:

Utah law reviewAs we mark the ten-year anniversary of the American Bar Association’s six-credit experiential learning requirement and the launch of the NextGen bar exam, it is critical for U.S. law schools to conduct rigorous assessments of their experiential education curricula. While most law schools now offer students meaningful opportunities to develop lawyering skills in clinics and field placements, there is much less consistency in their simulation course offerings. Simulation courses are a critical component of experiential legal education. While students in clinics and field placements gain valuable, realistic experience addressing the issues presented by their actual clients, those issues may sometimes be atypical and unlikely to recur in the students’ law practices after graduation. 

Continue reading

April 26, 2025 in Legal Ed Scholarship, Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink

Next Week’s Tax Workshops

Next Week's Tax Workshops - linkedinMonday, April 28: Kristin Hickman (Minnesota; Google Scholar) will present Delay, Politics, and Expertise in OIRA Tax Review, 44 Va. Tax Rev. __ (2025) (with Bridget C.E. Dooling (Ohio State; Google Scholar)), as part of the Columbia Davis Polk & Wardwell Tax Policy Colloquium. If you would like to attend, please contact Michael Love.

Tuesday, April 29: Andrew Hayashi (Virginia; Google Scholar) will present The Effect of CAMT on Financial Reporting (with Quinn Curtis (Virginia; Google Scholar)) as part of the USC Corporate and Commercial Law Seminar. If you would like to attend, please contact Michael Simkovic and D. Daniel Sokol

Wednesday, April 30: Daniel Hemel (NYU; Google Scholar) will present Formalism, Functionalism, and Nonfunctionalism in the Constitutional Law of Tax as part of the Missouri Tax Policy Colloquium. If you would like to attend, please contact David Gamage

Continue reading

April 26, 2025 in Colloquia, Legal Education, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship, Tax Workshops | Permalink

California Supreme Court Demands Answers From State Bar On Its Use Of AI In Preparing Bar Exam Questions

Following up on Wednesday's post, California Bar Allowed Non-Lawyers To Use AI To Draft February Exam Questions, Will Ask Supreme Court To Lower Cut Score:  Los Angeles Times, California Supreme Court Demands State Bar Answer Questions on AI Exam Controversy:

California Bar (2021)The California Supreme Court urged the State Bar of California on Thursday to explain how and why it utilized artificial intelligence to develop multiple-choice questions for its botched February bar exams.

California’s highest court, which oversees the State Bar, disclosed Tuesday that its justices were not informed before the exam that the State Bar had allowed its independent psychometrician to use AI to develop a small subset of questions.

The Court on Thursday upped its public pressure on the State Bar, demanding it explain how it used AI to develop questions — and what actions it took to ensure the reliability of the questions.

Continue reading

April 26, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink

Tax-Exempt Status For NIL Collectives

Austin Siener (J.D. 2025, Missouri-Columbia), Note, Time for an Audible: Possible Solutions for NIL Colectives Seeking Tax-Exempt Status following IRS Memo, 89 Mo. L. Rev. 741 (2024): 

Missouri law reviewThe United States Supreme Court’s decision in NCAA v. Alston sent shockwaves throughout the world of college sports. The Court’s recognition of student athletes’ abilities to profit from their name, image, and likeness (“NIL”) revolutionized the landscape of collegiate athletics. Shortly thereafter, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (the “NCAA”) adopted its Interim NIL Policy, explicitly allowing opportunities for companies, entities, or individuals to pay student athletes for use of their NIL. Unsurprisingly, athletes capitalized on the opportunities immediately. For example, Hanna and Haley Cavinder, former women’s college basketball players with millions of followers on social media, completed an NIL deal with Boost Mobile, a wireless service provider, within hours of the NCAA policy’s enactment. 

Continue reading

April 26, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink

Friday, April 25, 2025

Weekly SSRN Tax Article Review And Roundup: Speck Reviews The Past And Future Of Taxing “Incomes” By Wallace & Wells

This week, Sloan Speck (Colorado; Google Scholar) reviews a new work by Clint Wallace (South Carolina; Google Scholar) & Bret Wells (Houston; Google Scholar), The Past and Future of Taxing "Incomes", 104 N.C. L. Rev. ___ (2025).

Sloan-speck

The Supreme Court’s recent consideration of Moore v. United States has sparked a broad and deep academic interest in the history of the realization concept in U.S. income tax law. Realization, of course, refers to the mechanic, explicit or implicit across broad swaths the current Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulations, that measures taxpayers’ income by reference to identifiable events that fix the timing and amount of that income. Although the Moore majority sidestepped the issue of whether the Constitution requires realization when taxing income, the Moore opinions indicate that past understandings of income will inform the Court’s future forays into the constitutionality of tax statutes. History and tradition have come to federal income tax law. As Conor Clarke aptly quipped after oral arguments in Moore, “we are all tax historians now.”

Continue reading

April 25, 2025 in Scholarship, Sloan Speck, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship, Weekly SSRN Roundup, Weekly Tax Roundup | Permalink

Weekly Legal Education Roundup

Tax Policy In The Trump Administration

28th Annual Critical Tax Conference At Wisconsin

Wisconsin hosts the 28th Annual Critical Tax Conference today and tomorrow (program): 

Wisconsin law schoolFriday 

9:00 AM: Welcome 

  • Dan Tokaji (Dean, Wisconsin) 

9:10 - 10:15 AM: Panel 1

10:30 - 12:00 PM: Panel 2

Continue reading

April 25, 2025 in Conferences, Legal Education, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Conferences, Tax Daily, Tax Workshops | Permalink

2025-26 U.S. News Omnibus Specialty Rankings v. Overall Rankings

Following up on yesterday's post, 2025-26 U.S. News Omnibus Specialty Rankings:

Here are the law schools whose U.S. News Omnibus Specialty Ranking most exceeds their overall U.S. News Ranking:

  School Specialty Rank Overall Rank Difference
1 American 24 104 +80
2 Santa Clara 85 156 +71
3 Pacific 94 163 +69
4 Illinois-Chicago 104 169 +65
5 Howard 63 127 +64
6 Brooklyn 56 117 +61
6 Case Western 46 107 +61
8 Suffolk 70 127 +57
9 Rutgers 51 104 +53
10 Denver 37 88 +51
11 CUNY 107 156 +49
12 Miami 44 92 +48
12 Pace 93 141 +48
12 UC Law - SF* 40 88 +48
15 Baltimore 92 139 +47
16 San Francisco* 120 166 +46
16 Seattle 81 127 +46
18 DePaul 95 133 +38
18 Hofstra 87 125 +38
20 Mitchell | Hamline 117 154 +37
21 Widener (DE) 134 169 +35
22 Maryland 30 63 +33
23 Loyola-New Orleans 102 134 +32
23 Michigan State 83 115 +32
23 Nova 147 179 +32
23 Widener (PA) 143 175 +32
27 Cal-Western* 150 179 +29
28 Vermont 135 163 +28
29 Houston 36 63 +27
29 Loyola-Chicago 52 79 +27
31 Temple 24 50 +26
31 UNLV 53 79 +26
33 UC-Irvine* 14 38 +24
34 Arizona State 22 45 +23
34 Chicago-Kent 84 107 +23
34 Fordham 15 38 +23
34 Oregon 71 94 +23
38 Lewis & Clark 77 99 +22
38 Quinnipiac* 119 141 +22
38 Tulane* 49 71 +22
38 Willamette 128 150 +22
42 George Washington 11 31 +20
42 Louisville 126 146 +20
42 Syracuse 87 107 +20
45 UC-Davis 31 50 +19
46 Georgia State 61 79 +18
46 Southern* 157 175 +18
48 Gonzaga* 124 141 +17
48 Southern Illinois 158 175 +17
48 St. Mary's 131 148 +17
48 Stetson 82 99 +17

Here are the law schools whose U.S. News Omnibus Specialty Ranking most trails their overall U.S. News Ranking:

Continue reading

April 25, 2025 in Law School Rankings, Legal Ed News, Legal Ed Rankings, Legal Education | Permalink

‘Accountant 2’ Opens Today: CPAs Are Geeked Up For Their Bean-Counting Badass ‘John Wick’

Wall Street Journal, Accountants Get Their Dream: Another Movie About Accounting:

TheAccountant22CPAs are geeked for the morale boost that only the bean-counting badass in the movie can provide; ‘It’s our ‘John Wick.‘’

Leigh Olphin got fed up at work recently while trying to learn how to use new AI automation software. So the 37-year-old accountant did what she often does when she returns home from a stressful day: Watch “The Accountant.”

Like many other people in her field, Olphin is obsessed with the 2016 film because it bestows ass-kicking qualities on someone in her decidedly nerdy profession. The movie stars Ben Affleck as Christian Wolff, an accountant with autism who uses both math and martial arts in his job auditing the books for corrupt businessmen.

“It’s our ‘John Wick,’” she said, referring to the movie franchise centered on a legendary hit man. ...

The Accountant 2” hits theaters next week, 10 days after the tax-filing deadline and not a moment too soon for the film’s biggest fans. The profession has faced challenge after challenge since the original movie came out, including auditing shortfalls, a worker shortage and the existential threat of AI. In short, accountants could use a morale boost. ...

Continue reading

April 25, 2025 in Tax, Tax Daily, Tax News | Permalink

Thursday, April 24, 2025

Sam: Distribution Through Taxation Versus Legal Rules, And The Epistemic Limits Of Law-and-Economics

Erick Sam (Utah), Distribution Through Taxation Versus Legal Rules, and the Epistemic Limits of Law-and-Economics, 2024 Utah L. Rev. 1047 :

Utah law reviewThis Article develops an epistemic critique of the view, widely held in law-and-economics, that legal rules should always be chosen for efficiency and that redistribution to produce a fair distribution should be conducted solely through the tax-and-transfer system. In place of this orthodox view, I develop an alternative distributive theory.

The canonical ‘double distortion’ argument for the orthodox position, formulated by Kaplow and Shavell (1994), claims that opting for efficient legal rules minimizes economic distortions and maximizes aggregate social wealth, some of which can then be redistributed via the tax-and-transfer system to those who would have been better off under the distributionally fair rules, thereby producing Pareto improvements relative to that latter regime.

Continue reading

April 24, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink

Trump Executive Order Targets College (And Law School) Accreditors (Including ABA), Blames DEI For Low Standards And Poor Student Outcomes

TrumpAccreditation

Reforming Accreditation to Strengthen Higher Education:

The American Bar Association’s Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar (Council), which is the sole federally recognized accreditor for Juris Doctor programs, has required law schools to “demonstrate by concrete action a commitment to diversity and inclusion” including by “commit[ting] to having a student body [and faculty] that is diverse with respect to gender, race, and ethnicity.”  As the Attorney General has concluded and informed the Council, the discriminatory requirement blatantly violates the Supreme Court’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, 600 U.S. 181 (2023).  Though the Council subsequently suspended its enforcement while it considers proposed revisions, this standard and similar unlawful mandates must be permanently eradicated.

Continue reading

April 24, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink

Detroit Law Review Symposium: Law School 101—An Exploration Of Legal Pedagogy

Symposium, Law School 101: An Exploration Of Legal Pedagogy, 101 U. Det. L. Rev. 257-374 (2024): 

Continue reading

April 24, 2025 in Legal Ed Scholarship, Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink

Thomas: Rethinking Tax Information—The Case For Quarterly 1099s

Kathleen DeLaney Thomas (North Carolina; Google Scholar), Rethinking Tax Information: The Case for Quarterly 1099s, 97 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1527 (2024): 

Southern california law reviewWhen an electricity provider wants customers to pay their bills monthly, it sends them a bill each month. Yet, this is not how the tax system works— at least not for independent contractors. Their taxes are due quarterly, but they receive a tax statement (Form 1099) only one time a year. It is up to the individual, then, to know when their taxes are due and how to pay them, and it is on that individual to estimate how much they owe each quarter. As a result, compliance for independent contractors—particularly for online platform workers—tends to be lacking. Failure to pay their estimated taxes subjects these taxpayers to potential penalties and causes the government to collect less tax revenue.

There is a simple—yet entirely overlooked—reform that could vastly improve compliance when it comes to paying estimated taxes: third-party information returns (Form 1099s) should be issued to taxpayers on a quarterly basis. The idea is straightforward and intuitive.

Continue reading

April 24, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink

A Growing Chorus Of Law School Deans And Faculty Are Speaking Out Against Trump’s Threat To The Rule Of Law

Law.com, Growing Chorus of Law School Faculty, Leadership Speaking Out Against Threats to Rule of Law:

Lawcom2In the wake of the Trump administration's recent string of unprecedented actions against law firms, courts and universities, an increasing number of law professors and leaders have expressed concerns over constitutional violations and threats to the rule of law.

Faculty at New York University School of Law are the latest to join law school faculty at Harvard, Yale, Stanford, and the University of California at Los Angeles, Berkeley and Davis in issuing an open letter to condemn the administration's recent actions.

“The Administration’s executive orders targeting individual lawyers and law firms have no basis in law and are contrary to the protections of our Constitution,” the April 17 NYU Law faculty letter states. “Similarly, government threats to impeach judges based on disagreements with their judicial decisions are inconsistent with the fundamental principles underlying judicial independence, principles that have been respected by political actors of all stripes for over 200 years. An independent judiciary is essential to the preservation of the rule of law and our most basic constitutional rights.” ...

“I think [the legal community is] worried that there's going to be a loss of independence,” retired Judge Jeremy Fogel, who is executive director of the Berkeley Judicial Institute, told Law.com in an interview. “People worry that they won't be able to say certain things, that lawyers won't be able to represent certain people, that judges will be intimidated for doing certain things. There are a lot of fears.”

However, since many law deans—including most of the so-called T-14—are bound by university neutrality policies or similar guidelines that prevent or discourage them from making statements on political issues, most T-14 deans have largely remained quiet, with a handful of exceptions.

University of California, Berkeley School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, who has long been outspoken against the Trump administration’s actions, is the only dean to sign the letter organized by his school's faculty. ...

Continue reading

April 24, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink

2025-26 U.S. News Omnibus Specialty Rankings

The new 2025-26 U.S. News Specialty Rankings include the rankings for 13 specialty programs at 195 law schools. Here are the Top 100 law schools, determined by giving equal weight to each of the 13 separate specialty rankings:

  1. Business/Corporate Law
  2. Clinical Law
  3. Constitutional Law
  4. Contracts/Commercial Law
  5. Criminal Law
  6. Dispute Resolution
  7. Environmental Law
  8. Health Care Law
  9. Intellectual Property Law
  10. International Law
  11. Legal Writing 
  12. Tax Law
  13. Trial Advocacy

  School 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Avg.
1 Georgetown* 12 1 11 11 9 18 14 8 9 3 11 3 21 10.1
2 Harvard* 1 24 2 1 3 3 7 6 12 2 108 12 34 16.5
3 NYU* 2 2 5 6 1 35 7 34 3 1 70 1 56 17.2
4 Michigan* 11 4 9 6 3 27 18 20 12 8 27 6 73 17.2
5 Stanford* 5 14 4 1 1 14 12 7 1 10 96 18 64 19.0
6 UC-Berkeley* 7 4 5 6 7 48 2 53 2 6 70 31 16 19.8
7 Northwestern* 12 12 14 13 15 7 44 46 23 22 34 3 19 20.3
8 UCLA* 8 24 16 11 8 29 6 17 12 17 103 10 5 20.5
9 Duke* 12 31 12 17 9 72 14 26 12 13 27 10 83 26.0
10 Columbia* 2 19 5 4 9 23 5 46 12 3 103 8 112 27.0
11 George Washington 31 24 31 44 32 48 18 17 5 8 34 23 43 27.5
12 Texas 18 31 14 13 16 35 38 34 12 26 96 12 29 28.8
13 Penn* 5 31 9 6 3 48 25 20 9 18 110 22 73 29.2
14 UC-Irvine* 41 14 26 26 21 27 30 59 35 29 8 8 56 29.2
15 Fordham 18 14 26 23 16 12 76 59 20 19 70 23 5 29.3
16 Virginia* 8 53 5 6 3 59 25 30 20 11 110 5 73 31.4
17 Yale* 8 8 1 4 9 86 21 12 45 3 107 15 96 31.9
18 Ohio State 35 53 31 30 16 1 44 17 73 41 17 35 43 33.5
19 Vanderbilt 15 31 17 13 9 35 12 40 26 19 89 50 83 33.8
20 Boston University 28 31 23 26 21 72 64 2 12 29 34 15 96 34.8
21 Washington Univ. 20 19 18 18 21 29 64 40 31 19 110 35 34 35.2
22 Arizona State 41 60 31 44 32 9 16 13 53 37 3 35 96 36.2
23 Minnesota 20 19 19 19 21 72 30 29 24 26 70 26 96 36.2
24 American 55 2 55 56 29 35 56 20 6 6 89 41 24 36.5
24 Temple 55 53 55 44 51 35 62 13 35 13 27 29 2 36.5
26 Cornell* 16 31 12 13 21 48 46 46 26 11 70 31 112 37.2
27 Chicago 2 43 2 1 9 86 64 59 24 13 102 6 73 37.2
28 Emory 23 84 26 23 34 35 38 24 35 29 70 41 24 37.4
29 North Carolina 23 53 23 19 21 48 50 30 31 55 10 18 112 37.9
30 Maryland 51 8 41 66 29 9 21 4 53 45 93 53 24 38.2
31 UC-Davis 31 76 19 35 16 23 16 59 31 22 89 26 64 39.0
32 Florida 23 112 35 19 40 14 30 53 45 55 61 2 48 41.3
33 Boston College 35 43 35 35 40 48 50 34 31 29 51 12 96 41.5
34 Texas A&M 51 60 41 44 75 3 25 44 6 45 27 67 56 41.8
35 William & Mary 41 90 19 26 21 35 56 59 35 29 27 53 56 42.1
36 Houston 62 84 65 53 57 23 36 9 12 71 15 41 29 42.8
37 Denver 78 8 65 72 40 35 21 80 45 41 17 53 8 43.3
38 Indiana (Maurer) 31 84 41 35 40 48 38 34 35 22 61 26 96 45.5
39 Georgia 28 60 37 26 51 72 50 40 58 22 110 41 34 48.4
40 UC Law - SF* 62 43 55 72 51 14 21 16 58 71 110 29 48 50.0
41 Wisconsin 35 43 23 35 34 72 38 69 73 37 34 41 126 50.8
42 Univ. of Washington* 55 43 55 35 34 102 38 34 35 37 44 41 112 51.2
43 USC 16 71 26 23 29 48 64 69 45 55 110 15 96 51.3
44 Miami 41 24 62 56 68 29 38 76 63 29 93 31 73 52.5
45 Wake Forest 41 112 41 44 34 48 56 24 63 82 7 67 73 53.2
46 Case Western 55 60 65 56 75 67 30 13 73 13 51 90 48 53.5
46 University of Arizona 51 60 37 44 57 59 30 46 85 45 8 62 112 53.5
48 Notre Dame 26 60 19 30 57 102 50 80 73 26 79 41 64 54.4
49 Tulane* 31 31 55 35 40 72 25 91 73 29 110 62 64 55.2
50 Cardozo 51 31 47 35 21 5 134 80 6 67 110 41 96 55.7
51 Rutgers 71 12 55 56 40 102 64 59 81 45 11 76 56 56.0
52 Loyola-Chicago 78 60 70 83 82 29 86 4 45 45 61 67 21 56.2
53 UNLV 55 24 86 66 68 9 64 46 35 131 1 53 96 56.5
54 Colorado 41 76 47 44 57 72 7 76 45 55 84 53 83 56.9
55 Northeastern 96 19 65 83 51 59 102 9 26 45 27 118 64 58.8
56 Brooklyn 35 24 47 53 20 67 112 91 81 67 61 50 64 59.4
57 Illinois 41 101 47 30 40 35 86 69 53 55 110 62 48 59.8
58 Iowa 26 90 37 19 57 59 50 76 53 55 110 53 96 60.1
59 Florida State 41 121 37 30 34 119 18 53 58 55 110 35 96 62.1
60 Pepperdine 88 43 47 56 82 2 112 109 85 55 84 23 34 63.1
61 Georgia State 55 43 41 77 40 86 102 3 73 82 110 62 48 63.2
62 Villanova 71 43 70 66 57 102 76 69 45 77 70 35 43 63.4
63 Howard 96 31 62 56 51 35 102 91 63 82 70 82 29 65.4
64 Utah 55 60 55 56 34 150 7 30 26 67 110 67 137 65.7
65 San Diego 62 125 31 56 40 150 50 59 20 55 110 18 83 66.1
66 Washington & Lee 35 76 47 35 57 86 64 80 63 41 110 62 112 66.8
67 SMU 41 53 70 66 40 150 64 46 63 71 110 53 48 67.3
68 Alabama 35 84 26 35 57 110 76 59 115 98 89 31 73 68.3
69 South Carolina 73 31 86 66 57 102 64 99 104 98 61 50 12 69.5
70 Suffolk 88 8 122 118 90 18 76 46 45 116 3 145 29 69.5
71 Oregon 62 125 70 56 75 12 7 128 99 77 1 67 137 70.5
72 Kansas 62 112 70 44 102 29 25 109 89 77 17 82 112 71.5
73 BYU 20 135 47 53 68 67 86 143 58 45 110 41 73 72.8
74 Loyola-L.A. 78 90 86 90 75 102 118 59 73 125 34 18 7 73.5
75 Tennessee 28 14 70 44 75 72 102 53 115 116 61 82 126 73.7
76 Seton Hall 78 71 79 77 82 95 97 9 63 77 110 76 48 74.0
77 Lewis & Clark 78 71 70 98 90 95 2 109 73 98 17 111 64 75.1
78 St. John's 78 101 79 77 57 72 124 109 63 77 17 118 21 76.4
79 Richmond 62 135 47 77 40 72 56 91 35 82 110 53 137 76.7
80 Pittsburgh* 78 101 65 83 51 110 86 34 58 45 110 35 151 77.5
81 Seattle 88 31 86 90 114 59 64 91 63 98 6 104 126 78.5
82 Stetson 96 112 98 90 90 18 76 109 149 116 3 76 1 79.5
83 Michigan State 62 53 98 72 82 59 86 109 63 71 110 95 83 80.2
84 Chicago-Kent 73 125 79 72 114 86 124 80 9 137 44 95 12 80.8
85 Santa Clara 62 90 86 83 68 86 97 86 4 37 110 82 165 81.2
86 Drexel 88 71 86 106 102 102 124 20 89 125 44 104 8 82.2
87 Hofstra 88 90 107 98 75 72 118 69 89 82 79 95 8 82.3
87 Syracuse 88 125 86 83 68 72 86 59 99 82 110 104 8 82.3
89 Wayne State 78 60 70 72 68 128 102 53 89 55 110 53 151 83.8
90 Connecticut 62 76 62 66 90 95 97 76 115 45 100 67 151 84.8
91 George Mason 41 169 41 30 90 119 102 122 26 82 110 90 96 86.0
92 Baltimore 127 4 107 139 57 95 76 122 89 98 51 82 96 87.9
93 Pace 113 121 153 130 118 18 1 86 132 67 110 82 19 88.5
94 Pacific 96 125 122 106 126 18 86 157 132 29 44 104 16 89.3
95 DePaul 88 90 98 90 118 110 124 26 35 116 110 104 56 89.6
96 Baylor 78 135 107 90 90 29 134 91 89 148 79 95 3 89.8
97 Missouri-Columbia 78 165 86 56 90 5 112 109 63 109 110 67 126 90.5
98 Oklahoma 73 135 86 77 82 95 86 40 104 98 110 90 112 91.4
99 Indiana (McKinney) 96 121 79 83 102 150 102 30 104 71 17 76 165 92.0
100 Marquette 108 121 107 90 82 48 86 109 81 116 17 111 137 93.3

*Denotes schools that did not submit statistical information to U.S.News. From the U.S News methodology:  "schools that declined to provide statistical information to U.S. News had their academic peer ratings programmatically discarded before any computations were made. Nonresponders were still scored using the full complement of eligible ratings submitted by peer schools, but any ratings they made of other schools were omitted." For the complete list of boycotting schools for the past three years, see Law Schools That Boycotted The U.S. News Rankings.

If anyone at a law school outside the Top 100 would like the data for their school's rank, email me.

Continue reading

April 24, 2025 in Law School Rankings, Legal Ed News, Legal Ed Rankings, Legal Education | Permalink

Blank & Osofsky: Introduction To Automated Agencies — The Transformation Of Government Guidance

Joshua D. Blank (UC-Irvine; Google Scholar) & Leigh Osofsky (North Carolina; Google Scholar), Introduction to Automated Agencies: The Transformation of Government Guidance (Cambridge University Press, 2025):

Auto Agencies CoverAdministrative agencies that are responsible for running federal government operations have increasingly turned to chatbots, virtual assistants, and other automated tools to offer guidance to the public about the law. Together, these tools can be thought of as “automated legal guidance.” These tools promise to be an easy-to-use source of information about underlying legal rules. But there is an unexpected catch. To make federal law accessible, the tools often flatten out complexities in the underlying legal system. As a result, when automated legal guidance tools offer “answers,” or explanations in response to questions, they may not, in fact, be accurate representations of the underlying law. Unfortunately, members of the public may rely upon these tools, unknowingly, at their peril.

Our book, Automated Agencies: The Transformation of Government Guidance (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming, 2025), which we introduce in this chapter, builds on years of research we have undertaken to explore these automated legal guidance systems. In conducting our research, we interviewed federal agency officials who are responsible for creating and managing automated legal guidance tools. Their answers to the questions we posed offer insights into what agencies think about these tools and the roles they are serving.

Continue reading

April 24, 2025 in Book Club, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

Oei Presents Global Tax Decluttering Today At Missouri

Shu-Yi Oei (Duke; Google Scholar) presents Global Tax Decluttering, 77 U.C. L.J. __ (2025) (with Diane Ring (Boston College; Google Scholar)) at Missouri today as part of its Tax Policy Colloquium hosted by David Gamage:

Shu-yi oeiMajor global players—most prominently the OECD and European Union—have recently begun advocating that countries “declutter” their tax systems to tidy up, repeal, or eliminate pre-existing domestic anti-abuse tax rules. The reasoning is that these country-level rules are now duplicative or burdensome in light of a new global tax agreement spearheaded by the OECD and G20 and multilaterally agreed upon in 2021 by over 140 countries. Yet, this new multilateral regime is still in the process of being rolled out and is entirely untested.

In this article, we examine this recently emergent “tax decluttering movement” and present an analytical framework for understanding it. We show how the recent push for tax decluttering belies a convergence of interests among several powerful actors (international organizations, certain countries and regional blocs, and businesses interests).

Continue reading

April 23, 2025 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship, Tax Workshops | Permalink

ABA Releases Class Of 2024 Jobs Data: ‘Maximum Credit’ Jobs Rate Rises To 89.7%, Up From 88.0% Last Year

ABA Legal Education Section Releases Employment Data For Graduating Law Class of 2024

Employment data for the graduating law class of 2024, as reported by American Bar Association-approved law schools accepting new J.D. students to the ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar on April 2, 2025, is now publicly available.

An online table provides select national outcomes and side-by-side comparisons for the classes of 2023 and 2024. Further reports on employment outcomes, including links to individual school outcomes and spreadsheets aggregating those reports, are available now on the ABA Required Disclosures page of the Section’s website. Schools can make corrections to their individual school outcomes for the class of 2024 until Friday, June 13, 2025. These corrections will be reflected in the Employment Summary Reports that are required to be posted publicly on their websites, as well as on the ABA Required Disclosures page. ...

Managing Director Jenn Rosato Perea responded:  “Despite initial concerns that the Class of 2024 employment outcomes might be impacted by an anticipated contraction in the market and increased size of the graduating class,  the percentage of recent law school graduates employed in full-time, long-term Bar Admission Required/Anticipated or JD Advantage jobs has reached another record-high – which is good news for the graduates.”

For the class of 2024, the aggregated school data shows that 33,931 or 87.1% of the 2024 graduates of the 194 law schools enrolling students and approved by the ABA to offer the J.D. degree were employed in full-time, long-term Bar Admission Required/Anticipated or J.D. Advantage jobs roughly 10 months after graduation. That compares to 30,160 or 85.6% of the graduates reporting similar full-time, long-term jobs last year. The actual number of full-time, long-term Bar Admission Required/Anticipated or J.D. Advantage jobs increased by 3,771, +12.5% year-over-year. ...

The current U.S. News law school rankings methodology defines "maximum credit" jobs as:

Outcomes 10 months after graduation (weighted 33%): This measures the extent to which graduates obtain the most in-demand jobs — namely those that are long term, full time and requiring (or taking advantage of) bar passage. Maximum credit was assigned for graduates with school-funded fellowships — as long as those fellowships were otherwise full-time, long-term jobs in which bar passage was required or the J.D. degree was an advantage. Maximum credit was assigned to law school graduates pursuing additional graduate studies.

89.7% of the Class of 2024 secured maximum credit jobs for U.S. News rankings purposes (up from 88.0% for the Class of 2023). 1.2% of the Class of 2024 secured law school funded full-time, long-term bar passage required/JD advantage jobs (up from 1.1% for the Class of 2023). 1.3% of the Class of 2024 pursued additional graduate studies (the same percentage as the Class of 2023).

Continue reading

April 23, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink

Organ: Astonishingly Strong Employment Outcomes For The Class of 2024

Jerry Organ (St. Thomas), Astonishingly Strong Employment Outcomes for the Class of 2024:

The ABA will be releasing data on employment outcomes for 2024 graduates of all ABA-accredited law schools in the coming days.  But I went and gathered the data from all ABA-accredited law schools to see how things turned out for the class of 2024, and the results are stunning!  Absolutely, unbelievably stunning!!

Across all ABA-accredited law schools outside of Puerto Rico, the number of graduates between 2023 and 2024 increased by 3,710, from 34,845 to 38,555, but the number of graduates in full-time, long-term bar passage required [FTLT BPR] jobs increased by even more — 3,731 — from 27,854 to 31,585! ...

Organ2

Continue reading

April 23, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink

California Bar Allowed Non-Lawyers To Use AI To Draft February Exam Questions, Will Ask Supreme Court To Lower Cut Score

Los Angeles Times, State Bar of California Admits It Used AI to Develop Exam Questions, Triggering New Furor:

California Bar (2021)Nearly two months after hundreds of prospective California lawyers complained that their bar exams were plagued with technical problems and irregularities, the state’s legal licensing body has caused fresh outrage by admitting that some multiple-choice questions were developed with the aid of artificial intelligence.

The State Bar of California said in a news release Monday that it will ask the California Supreme Court to adjust test scores for those who took its February bar exam.

But it declined to acknowledge significant problems with its multiple-choice questions — even as it revealed that a subset of questions were recycled from a first-year law student exam, while others were developed with the assistance of AI by ACS Ventures, the State Bar’s independent psychometrician.

“The debacle that was the February 2025 bar exam is worse than we imagined,” said Mary Basick, assistant dean of academic skills at UC Irvine Law School. “I’m almost speechless. Having the questions drafted by non-lawyers using artificial intelligence is just unbelievable.”

Continue reading

April 23, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink

SSRN Tax Professor Rankings

SSRN Logo (2018)SSRN has updated its monthly ranking of 750 American and international law school faculties and 3,000 law professors by (among other things) the number of paper downloads from the SSRN database.  Here is the new list (through April 1, 2025) of the Top 25 U.S. Tax Professors in two of the SSRN categories: all-time downloads and recent downloads (within the past 12 months):

    All-Time     Recent
1 Reuven Avi-Yonah (Michigan)  244,825 1 Reuven Avi-Yonah (Michigan) 13,376
2 Daniel Hemel (NYU) 138,934 2 Jonathan Choi (USC) 10,869
3 David Gamage (Missouri-Columbia) 131,786 3 Zachary Liscow (Yale) 8,392
4 Dan Shaviro (NYU) 130,952 4 Amy Monahan (Minnesota) 6,312
5 Lily Batchelder (NYU) 129,894 5 Daniel Hemel (NYU) 4,908
6 Darien Shanske (UC-Davis) 123,657 6 Kim Clausing (UCLA)     4,858
7 David Kamin (NYU) 116,498 7 Kristin Hickman (Minnesota) 4,538
8 Cliff Fleming (BYU)    110,058 8 Bridget Crawford (Pace) 4,511
9 Ari Glogower (Northwestern) 106,658 9 D. Dharmapala (UC-Berkeley) 3,899
10 Manoj Viswanathan (UC-SF) 105,873 10 Louis Kaplow (Harvard) 3,484
11 Rebecca Kysar (Fordham) 105,643 11 Darien Shanske (UC-Davis) 3,445
12 Mitchell Kane (NYU) 102,332 12 David Weisbach (Chicago) 3,356
13 D. Dharmapala (UC-Berkeley) 57,424 13 Ruth Mason (Virginia) 3,277
14 Michael Simkovic (USC) 52,578 14 David Gamage (Missouri-Columbia) 3,223
15 Jonathan Choi (USC) 47,714 15 Robert Sitkoff (Harvard) 3,166
16 Louis Kaplow (Harvard) 46,867 16 Brad Borden (Brooklyn) 3,161
17 Bridget Crawford (Pace) 44,351 17 Ed Fox (Michigan) 2,753
18 Paul Caron (Pepperdine) 43,079 18 Kyle Rozema (Northwestern) 2,687
19 Richard Ainsworth (Boston Univ.) 41,728 19 Michael Simkovic (USC) 2,669
20 Robert Sitkoff (Harvard) 37,931 20 Steve Johnson (Florida State) 2,534
21 Amy Monahan (Minnesota) 37,701 21 Ellen Aprill (Loyola-L.A.) 2,492
22 Brad Borden (Brooklyn) 36,500 22 Young Ran (Christine) Kim (Cardozo) 2,371
23 Ruth Mason (Virginia) 35,464 23 Richard Pomp (Connecticut) 2,349
24 Kim Clausing (UCLA) 34,512 24 Brian Galle (Georgetown) 2,328
25 Vic Fleischer (UC-Irvine) 32,159 25 Edward McCaffery (USC) 2,171

Continue reading

April 23, 2025 in Legal Education, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Prof Rankings, Tax Scholarship | Permalink

Large Language Scholarship: Generative AI In The Legal Academy

Alan Z. Rozenshtein (Minnesota; Google Scholar) & Kevin Frazier (Texas), Large Language Scholarship: Generative AI in the Legal Academy:

SSRNRapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have ushered in an era where machines meaningfully assist—and in some cases independently produce—legal reasoning, doctrinal synthesis, and scholarly writing. This Article introduces the concept of “Large Language Scholarship,” arguing that AI’s integration will significantly transform legal academia, altering both the quantity and quality of scholarship with profound implications for law professors, law schools, and the legal system. Unlike existing scholarship that focuses on preliminary demonstrations of AI’s capabilities and the associated ethical concerns, we offer a comprehensive analysis of the systemic institutional impacts of AI adoption.

Continue reading

April 23, 2025 in Legal Ed Scholarship, Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink

Law Schools That Boycotted The U.S. News Rankings

2023-2024 (Rank) 2024-2025 (Rank) 2025-2026 (Rank)
Stanford (1) Stanford (1) Stanford (1)
Yale (1) Yale (1) Yale (1)
Virginia (8) Virginia (4) Virginia (4)
Penn (4) Penn (4) Penn (5)
Duke (5) Duke (4) Duke (6)
Harvard (5) Harvard (4) Harvard (6)
Michigan (10) Michigan (9) Michigan (8)
NYU (5) NYU (9) NYU (8)
Columbia (8) Columbia (8) Columbia (10)
Northwestern (10) Northwestern (9) Northwestern (10)
UCLA (14) UCLA (13) UCLA (12)
UC-Berkeley (10) UC-Berkeley (12) UC-Berkeley (13)
Georgetown (15) Georgetown (14) Georgetown (14)
Vanderbilt (16) (19) (14)
Cornell (13) Cornell (14) Cornell (18)
Wisconsin (40) (36) (28)
UC-Irvine (35) UC-Irvine (42) UC-Irvine (38)
Connecticut (71) (55) (50)
UC-Davis (60) UC-Davis (55) (50)
Univ. of Washington (49) Univ. of Washington (48) Univ. of Washington (50)
Penn State-Dickinson (89) Penn State-Dickinson (75) Penn State-Dickinson (59)
(69) Cardozo (61) (63)
Maryland (51) (55) (63)
St. John's (60) St. John's (68) (63)
Northeastern (71) (68) (68)
Penn State-Univ. Park (80) Penn State-Univ. Park (68) Penn State-Univ. Park (68)
Nebraska (89) (82) (71)
Tulane (71) Tulane (78) Tulane (71)
Loyola-Chicago (84) (78) (79)
Pittsburgh (89) Pittsburgh (91) Pittsburgh (79)
UC Law - SF (60) UC Law - SF (82) UC Law - SF (88)
American (89) American (98) (104)
Rutgers (109) Rutgers (103) (104)
Syracuse (122) Syracuse (120) (107)
Brooklyn (111) Brooklyn (114) (117)
New Hampshire (105) New Hampshire (98) New Hampshire (125)
Seattle (111) Seattle (114) (127)
Campbell (125) Campbell (134) Campbell (134)
Detroit Mercy (141) (136) (134)
Loyola-New Orleans (111) Loyola-New Orleans (130) (134)
South Texas (162) (150) (138)
Gonzaga (99) Gonzaga (120) Gonzaga (141)
Idaho (141) Idaho (145) Idaho (141)
Quinnipiac (146) Quinnipiac (143) Quinnipiac (141)
Creighton (155) Creighton (153) (148)
Mitchell | Hamline (167) Mitchell | Hamline (164) (154)
Southwestern (141) Southwestern (145) Southwestern (154)
San Francisco (165) San Francisco (165) San Francisco (166)
Roger Williams (171) Roger Williams (172) Roger Williams (169)
Touro (167) (168) (169)
Capital (175) Capital (Tier 2) Capital (174)
Puerto Rico (Tier 2) Puerto Rico (Tier 2) Puerto Rico (175)
(Tier 2) Golden Gate (Tier 2) (N/A)
Western Michigan (Tier 2) Western Michigan (Tier 2) (N/A)
Appalachian (Tier 2) Appalachian (Tier 2) Appalachian (Tier 2)
Barry (Tier 2) Barry (Tier 2) Barry (Tier 2)
Cal-Western (175) Cal-Western (Tier 2) Cal-Western (Tier 2)
Florida A&M (Tier 2) Florida A&M (Tier 2) Florida A&M (Tier 2)
Inter-American (Tier 2) Inter-American (Tier 2) Inter-American (Tier 2)
John Marshall (GA) (171) John Marshall (GA) (176) John Marshall (GA) (Tier 2)
North Carolina Central (175) (Tier 2) North Carolina Central (Tier 2)
Pontifical Catholic (Tier 2) Pontifical Catholic (Tier 2) Pontifical Catholic (Tier 2)
Southern (Tier 2) Southern (Tier 2) Southern (Tier 2)
Texas Southern (Tier 2) Texas Southern (Tier 2) Texas Southern (Tier 2)

Continue reading

April 23, 2025 in Law School Rankings, Legal Ed News, Legal Ed Rankings, Legal Education | Permalink

Soled & Book: Transformative Technology And Shortening The Statute Of Limitations Applicable To Taxpayers

Jay A. Soled (Rutgers; Google Scholar) & Leslie Book (Villanova; Google Scholar), Transformative Technology and Shortening the Statute of Limitations Applicable to Taxpayers, 60 U. Rich. L. Rev. ___ (2025):

Richmond law reviewWhen it comes to submitting tax returns and paying taxes, most taxpayers understand the nature of their civic duties and do so dutifully, if not willingly. However, many taxpayers fail to grasp why Congress provides the IRS with such an elongated time period—namely, three years—to audit their tax returns and propose additional taxes. Indeed, when the IRS exercises its oversight authority by auditing taxpayers' returns, records may no longer be available, and memories may be dulled.

The time the IRS takes to assess additional tax reflects a balancing of interests: Too short a time to assess additional tax may embolden tax cheating and undermine confidence in our tax system; too long a time to assess additional tax imposes taxpayer and third-party administrative burdens.

Continue reading

April 23, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

Oei & Ring: Global Tax Decluttering

Shu-Yi Oei (Duke; Google Scholar) & Diane M. Ring (Boston College; Google Scholar), Global Tax Decluttering, 77 U.C. L.J. __ (2025):

Uc law journalMajor global players—most prominently the OECD and European Union—have recently begun advocating that countries “declutter” their tax systems to tidy up, repeal, or eliminate pre-existing domestic anti-abuse tax rules. The reasoning is that these country-level rules are now duplicative or burdensome in light of a new global tax agreement spearheaded by the OECD and G20 and multilaterally agreed upon in 2021 by over 140 countries. Yet, this new multilateral regime is still in the process of being rolled out and is entirely untested.

Continue reading

April 22, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink

The Economy Is Frightening. Law School Won’t Save You.

GQ, The Economy Is Frightening. Law School Won’t Save You.:


GQ3When it was reported last month that law school applications are up 20%, some of us who graduated around the 2008 recession thought of that one friend, the liberal artist-activist who, after six months of financial uncertainty, became conveniently passionate about the law. He got busy. He got a haircut. He got a Big Law job he never spoke about except when brandishing his pro bono bona fides.

Law student applications are a bearish indicator—the bearish indicator if you’re young and insufferably promising. Morgan Stanley is revising up the chance of a recession. Gen Z’ers are revising up the chances Aiden takes the LSAT.

He should check in with my one friend before he does. Big Law attorneys’ wages, which stagnated decades ago, show no sign of recovery with AI encroaching on billable hours. And the prestige associated with both Big Law School and Big Law is under direct threat from the White House. The Trump administration issued a number of executive orders targeting lawyers, including those that have investigated him: taking away the security clearance they need to do business, inquiring about their DEI practices, promising sanctions against those that sue the government. Already, the law firms Paul Weiss, Skadden Arps, and Perkins Coie have cut deals with the White House, promising to spend firm hours that would have once been devoted to pro bono work grooming the administration’s pet causes. ...

Continue reading

April 22, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink

Cauble: Taxing Composite Transactions

Emily Cauble (Wisconsin; Google Scholar), Taxing Composite Transactions, 77 SMU L. Rev. 349 (2024):

SMU Law ReviewIn a variety of contexts, taxpayers engage in composite transactions — essentially two transactions in one. For instance, when an individual sells property for less than its fair market value to a friend or relative, the transaction involves a sale and a gift. As another example, from time to time, retailers run promotions offering to rebate the price of merchandise if a team wins a sporting event. A buyer of the merchandise, effectively, makes a purchase and also places a bet on the sporting event's outcome.

Tax law's treatment of composite transactions is not uniform. In some contexts, tax law fully bifurcates these transactions into their separate components. Under this bifurcated approach, a taxpayer who engages in a composite transaction receives the same tax treatment as a taxpayer who goes through the motions of engaging in the component transactions separately. In other contexts, tax law adopts a collapsed approach under which taxpayers obtain markedly different tax treatment by engaging in a composite transaction instead of carrying out the components as separate transactions.

Continue reading

April 22, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Scholarship | Permalink

Forward Looking Academic Impact Rankings For U.S. Law Schools

Matthew Sag (Emory; Google Scholar), Forward Looking Academic Impact Rankings for U.S. Law Schools, 51 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 763 (2024):

Florida state law reviewAlthough the very concept of law school rankings is currently under fire, rankings abolitionism is misplaced. Given the number, diversity, and geographic dispersion of the more than 190 law schools fully accredited by the American Bar Association, rankings are essential to enable various stakeholders to make comparisons between schools. However, the current rankings landscape is dire. The U.S News law school rankings rely on poorly designed, highly subjective surveys to gauge “reputational strength,” rather than looking to easily available, objective citation data that is more valid and reliable. Would-be usurpers of U.S. News use better data but make other arbitrary choices that limit and distort their rankings. One flaw common to U.S. News and those who would displace it is the fetishization of minor differences in placement that do not reflect actual differences in substance. This information is worse than trivial: it is actively misleading. This Article proposes a new set of law school rankings free from all of these defects.

Continue reading

April 22, 2025 in Law School Rankings, Legal Ed Scholarship, Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink

2025-26 U.S. News Trial Advocacy Rankings

US News (2023)The new 2025-26 U.S. News Trial Advocacy Rankings include the trial advocacy programs at 195 law schools (the faculty survey had a 47% response rate). Here are the Top 50:

Rank School
1 Stetson
2 Temple
3 Baylor
4 Samford
5 Fordham
5 UCLA
7 Loyola-L.A.
8 Denver
8 Drexel
8 Hofstra
8 Syracuse
12 Chicago-Kent
12 Mercer
12 South Carolina
12 South Texas
16 Pacific
16 St. Mary's
16 UC-Berkeley
19 Northwestern
19 Pace
21 Georgetown
21 Loyola-Chicago
21 St. John's
24 American
24 Emory
24 Maryland
24 Nova
24 Ohio Northern
29 Houston
29 Howard
29 Inter-American (PR)
29 Suffolk
29 Texas
34 Georgia
34 Harvard
34 Illinois-Chicago
34 Pepperdine
34 Quinnipiac
34 Texas Tech
34 Washington Univ.
41 Campbell
41 Missouri-Kansas City
43 George Washington
43 Louisiana State
43 Ohio State
43 SUNY-Buffalo
43 Villanova
48 Akron
48 Case Western
48 Florida
48 Georgia State
48 Illinois
48 Seton Hall
48 SMU
48 UC Law - SF

2024-25 U.S. News Trial Advocacy Rankings

2025-26 U.S. News Specialty Rankings:

Continue reading

April 22, 2025 in Law School Rankings, Legal Ed News, Legal Ed Rankings, Legal Education | Permalink

The Professional Employer Organization Regulatory Regime

Ursula Ramsey (North Carolina), The Professional Employer Organization Regulatory Regime, 20 UC L. SF Bus. J. 95 (2024)

Uc law sf business journalEmployment taxes constitute over thirty percent of the revenue collected by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). For fiscal year 2022, the IRS’s employment tax collections totaled over 1.3 billion dollars. Over the past few decades, a new industry has emerged that provides payroll, human resources, and employment tax services to its small to mid-sized business clients.to its small to mid-sized business clients payroll, human resources, and employment tax services. On behalf of business clients, these professional employer organizations (“PEOs”) remit the employment taxes associated with 216 billion dollars in worksite employee wages. This number represents the wages of four million worksite employees. Though there are 487 PEOs operating in the United States with over 170,000 client companies, the industry has received little scholarly study. Beyond the government’s interest in the efficient collection of employment taxes, regulation in the PEO industry warrants attention to ensure that those 170,000 small businesses receive the services for which they contract. Additionally, regulation in the industry warrants attention to ensure that those four million workers receive the protections to which they are entitled by law.

Continue reading

April 22, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink

Monday, April 21, 2025

Clarke Presents Apportioned Direct Taxes Today At Columbia

Conor Clarke (Washington University; Google Scholar) presents Apportioned Direct Taxes (with Ari Glogower (Northwestern; Google Scholar)) at Columbia today as part of its Davis Polk & Wardwell Tax Policy Colloquium hosted by Michael Love:

Conor clarkeThe Constitution requires that Congress apportion any “direct” tax among the states by population. This once-dormant provision is now the most important constitutional limitation on Congress’s taxing power. Last year, in Moore v. United States, the Supreme Court seriously considered, for the first time in decades, whether to invalidate an Act of Congress as an unapportioned direct tax. While the law survived, Moore signals a new era in which scholars and policymakers must again take apportionment seriously. Yet the apportionment requirement remains poorly understood.

This Article provides a new account of apportionment by examining how Congress and Treasury actually designed and implemented apportioned direct taxes. 

Continue reading

April 21, 2025 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship, Tax Workshops | Permalink

Legal Ed News Roundup

Roberts: The Tax Trench Deepens

Tracey M. Roberts (Cumberland; Google Scholar), The Tax Trench Deepens, 28 Fla. Tax Rev. ___ (2025):

Florida tax reviewCongress, long divided, has been in gridlock for decades. The result has been regulatory ossification. Existing statutes lack the flexibility to manage the country’s many technological, social, environmental, sectoral, and market challenges. However, without a Senate super-majority vote to override the filibuster, new legislation fails. While the budget reconciliation process has provided one of the few pathways around the filibuster, that process is limited to budgetary outlays and revenue measures. Consequently, a “tax trench” has been worn from Congress repeatedly pushing major regulatory and public benefits legislation through the process as tax provisions. Now, the tax trench is set to deepen. Following a spate of cases decided in 2024, U.S. Supreme Court has placed a series of checks on federal regulatory authority, discretion, and enforcement capacity. 

Continue reading

April 21, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink

Are Appellate Clinics Effective?

Xiao Wang (Virginia), Are Appellate Clinics Effective?, 31 Clin. L. Rev. 427 (2025):

Clinical law reviewLaw school clinics are integral to legal education, offering students practical experience while serving clients in need and affecting the law more broadly. But despite the enormous investments in experiential learning that law schools make each year, there remains a lack of comprehensive research assessing the efficacy of clinics in serving clients.

Continue reading

April 21, 2025 in Legal Ed Scholarship, Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink