Tuesday, March 25, 2025
IRS Nears Deal To Give ICE Addresses Of Immigrants Targeted For Deportation
New York Times, I.R.S. Prepares to Help Find Immigrants Targeted for Deportation:
The tax agency is nearing an agreement to verify whether ICE officials have the right address for people they are trying to deport.
The Internal Revenue Service is preparing to help homeland security officials locate immigrants they are trying to deport, according to three officials familiar with the matter, in a shift toward using protected taxpayer information to help President Trump’s mass deportation push.
Under a draft of an agreement between the I.R.S. and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the tax agency would verify whether immigration officials had the right home address for people who have been ordered to leave the United States, according to a copy of the document viewed by The New York Times.
Wall Street Journal, IRS Nears Deal to Share Data for Immigration Enforcement:
March 25, 2025 in IRS News, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax News | Permalink
Mississippi Symposium: Tributes To Dean Deborah Hodges Bell
Symposium, Tributes to Dean Deborah Hodges Bell, 93 Miss. L.J. 569-616 (2024):
Frederick G. Slabach (Dean, Mississippi), The Legend of Debbie Bell: A Skinny on Service and Impact, 93 Miss. L.J. 569 (2024)
- Guthrie T. Abbott (Mississippi), Tribute to Deborah Hodges Bell, 93 Miss. L.J. 573 (2024)
- I. Richard Gershon (Mississippi; Google Scholar), Tribute to Professor Debbie Bell, 93 Miss. L.J. 575 (2024)
- Morris H. Stocks (Mississippi; Google Scholar), A Letter for Professor Deborah H. Bell, 93 Miss. L.J. 577 (2024)
- David W. Case (Mississippi), Tribute to Professor Deborah Hodges Bell, 93 Miss. L.J. 579 (2024)
- Jack Wade Nowlin (Texas Tech), Dean Debbie Bell: Extraordinary Administrator, 93 Miss. L.J. 595 (2024)
March 25, 2025 in Legal Ed Scholarship, Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink
Can AI Hold Office Hours?
Lisa Larrimore Ouellette (Stanford; Google Scholar), Amy Motomura (Loyola-L.A.; Google Scholar), Jason Reinecke (Marquette) & Jonathan S. Masur (Chicago; Google Scholar), Can AI Hold Office Hours?:
Rapid improvements in AI tools offer transformative opportunities in legal education, including the possibility of students using AI tools to answer questions that students might otherwise ask during office hours. But a critical challenge is the accuracy of these tools’ responses. Both general-purpose and law-specific AI models have been shown to “hallucinate” incorrect responses to a range of legal questions. Here, we evaluate the current capabilities of AI models when given the more constrained task of answering questions about a specific legal text. We provided three AI tools—OpenAI’s GPT-4o, Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Google’s NotebookLM—with the text of Masur & Ouellette’s Patent Law: Cases, Problems, and Materials, a free patent casebook that has been adopted at over seventy law schools. We then asked each tool to answer 185 questions based solely on the casebook, including questions asked by students in our own patent law classes, and we graded the responses.
March 25, 2025 in Legal Ed Scholarship, Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink
Plans To Hike The College Endowment Tax Are Not What You’d Expect
Chronicle of Higher Education, Plans to Hike the College-Endowment Tax Are Taking Shape. They’re Not What You’d Expect.:
Amid the deluge of executive orders, budget slashes, and confirmation hearings that has typified the Trump administration’s first 100 days, there’s one pending legislative matter that some college leaders are eyeing with particular anxiety: a possible endowment-tax expansion.
The current tax, enacted by Congress in 2018, skims from the annual investment income of the endowments of a thin and uneven layer of the wealthiest colleges — 56 institutions in 2023, according to the Internal Revenue Service. Broad tax cuts pushed through by President Trump in 2017 are due to sunset this year, and the White House and Republican-controlled Congress plan to extend them. To do that, they need to find ways to pay for the cuts, and expanding the tax on colleges’ investment earnings is likely to be part of their solution — it was included on a list of policy possibilities compiled by Republican members of the House Budget Committee and leaked earlier this year.
Expanding the tax would cost the colleges it applies to more money — possibly a lot more. Legislation has been introduced that would tax colleges’ investment income by 35 percent. The number of colleges it applies to could also grow. College leaders and many experts believe the tax is harmful, cutting into institutions’ ability to provide financial aid and keep costs down, and expanding it would only increase the damage. What is the tax, how might it change, and what might be the consequences? ...
March 25, 2025 in Congressional News, Legal Ed News, Legal Education, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax News | Permalink
Monday, March 24, 2025
Gómez Presents Coin Taxes Today At Columbia
Luís Carlos Calderón Gómez (Cardozo; Google Scholar) presents Coin Taxes, 16 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. __ (2025) (with Mitchell Kane (NYU; Google Scholar)), at Columbia today as part of its Davis Polk & Wardwell Tax Policy Colloquium hosted by Michael Love:
New kinds of private money are thriving, with increasing circulation, growing acceptance, and rapid technological innovation. But this new suffers from an old problem: bank runs. Bank runs can destabilize even well-regulated and healthy banks, and their contagion can catalyze and amplify a system-wide financial crisis. Since the 1930s, policymakers have sought to protect our financial system from bank runs through public deposit insurance and other emergency response mechanisms. Those historically effective policy tools, however, are critically unavailable or ineffective in the context of these new types of money. As a result, these new types of money remain critically vulnerable to bank runs, and the potential for financial contagion from their failure poses catastrophic risks to society.
In light of traditional legal tools’ inadequacy, the Article proposes an unconventional solution to the financial contagion risks these new kinds of money impose on society writ-large: taxation.
March 24, 2025 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship, Tax Workshops | Permalink
Legal Ed News Roundup
ABA Journal, St. Thomas College Of Law Falls Out Of Compliance With ABA Accreditation Standard
- ABA Journal, State Bar Of California Considers Provisional Licenses For February Bar Exam Takers
- Bloomberg Law, Law School Applicants Want AI Policies in Admissions Clarified
- Canadian Bar Association, Re-Educating Law Schools
- Detroit Free Press, Patent Law Expert Named New Dean of University of Michigan Law School
- Fortune, Harvard Law Students Want $53 Billion Fund to Sever Israel Ties
- Kaplan Survey, Pre-Law Students Want Clarity from Law Schools on Using GenAI in Admissions Essays … Clarity That’s Currently Lacking
- Legal Intelligencer, Duquesne's President Slated to Step Down After a Decade Leading the School
March 24, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
Wallace & Wells: The Past And Future Of Taxing ‘Incomes’
Clint Wallace (South Carolina; Google Scholar) & Bret Wells (Houston; Google Scholar), The Past and Future of Taxing "Incomes", 104 N.C. L. Rev. ___ (2025):
For at least half a century, the text of the Sixteenth Amendment—“Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived”—has been treated by courts, lawmakers and scholars as giving Congress plenary authority to define and tax income, perhaps without any limitation. Recently, however, some members of the Supreme Court started to revive a seedling planted in the 1920s but left for dead: that the “realization rule” should be elevated to the status of a constitutional limit to Congress’s power to determine what is income. With this, we seem to be entering a new era in constitutional tax jurisprudence, focused on the meaning of income and limits to Congress’s power to tax it.
March 24, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink
Mazur & Thimmesch: Beyond ChatGPT: Transforming Government With Augmented LLMs
Orly Mazur (SMU; Google Scholar) & Adam B. Thimmesch (Nebraska; Google Scholar), Beyond ChatGPT: Transforming Government with Augmented LLMs, 92 Tenn. L. Rev. ___ (2025):
The release of ChatGPT demonstrated the remarkable capabilities and the existing limitations of large language models (LLMs) and the natural language chatbots that they power. One area that is ripe for innovation using this new technology, but that has often been bypassed in mainstream discussions, is the public sector. This Article redirects attention towards this overlooked area, acknowledging the limitations of LLMs, while specifically exploring their potential to transform government operations.
March 24, 2025 in Legal Ed Scholarship, Legal Ed Tech, Legal Education, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink
A Critical Perspective On Formative Assessment Mandates
Joshua M. Silverstein (Arkansas-Little Rock; Google Scholar), A Critical Perspective on Formative Assessment Mandates, 47 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 189 (2025):
Formative assessment is a hot topic in legal education. Numerous commentators maintain that such assessment improves student learning of legal skills and content. Many law schools have adopted formative assessment requirements. And the American Bar Association recently proposed changing law school accreditation standards to mandate formative assessment in the first year. This essay challenges these trends. There is a paucity of evidence that formative assessment enhances learning among law students. Much of the broader assessment literature has limited relevance in legal education.
March 24, 2025 in Legal Ed Scholarship, Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink
IRS Braces For 10 Percent Less Tax Revenue ($500 Billion) Due To DOGE Staff And Budget Cuts
Washington Post, Tax Revenue Could Drop by 10 Percent Amid Turmoil at IRS:
Staff cuts and disruptions related to the U.S. DOGE Service have officials bracing for a sharp loss of revenue.
Senior tax officials are bracing for a sharp drop in revenue collected this spring, as an increasing number of individuals and businesses spurn filing their taxes or attempt to skip paying balances owed to the Internal Revenue Service, according to three people with knowledge of tax projections.
Treasury Department and IRS officials are predicting a decrease of more than 10 percent in tax receipts by the April 15 deadline compared with 2024, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share nonpublic data. That would amount to more than $500 billion in lost federal revenue; the IRS collected $5.1 trillion last year. For context, the U.S. government spent $825 billion on the Defense Department in fiscal 2024.
“The idea of doing that in one year, it’s hard to grapple with how meaningful of a shift that represents,” said Natasha Sarin, president of the Yale Budget Lab and a senior Biden administration tax official.
March 24, 2025 in IRS News, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax News | Permalink
TaxProf Blog Weekend Roundup
- This Week's Ten Most Popular TaxProf Blog Posts
- Hickman & Wildermuth: Harmonizing Delegation And Deference After Loper Bright
- The Feminist Law Professor Who Wants To Stop Arresting People For Domestic Violence
- Pepperdine Caruso Law Clinical Program Update
- Applications Are Open For Two ABA Tax Section Fellowships
Sunday:
- ‘Severance,’ Suffering, And Faith
- Abraham Lincoln, The Civil War, And Faith
- The False Battle Between Justice And Mercy
- Regent Law School Dean Named President Of Grove City College
- Straight, White Female Loses Bias Claim Over King & Spalding's Summer Associate Diversity Program
- The Top Five New Tax Papers
March 24, 2025 in Faith, Legal Education, Tax, Weekend Roundup | Permalink
Sunday, March 23, 2025
‘Severance,’ Suffering, And Faith
Christianity Today, ‘Severance’ Makes a Case for Suffering:
Mark Scout cannot bear the reality of his wife’s death.
When he’s alone with his thoughts, he ambles over to the fridge, cracks open a beer, and dozes off with the TV on. When he heads to the office, he sticks his phone in a locker, lets a security officer wave him down with a wand, and enters an elevator that activates a chip in his brain, cutting off his access to any memories outside his workplace’s basement.
This is the premise of Apple TV’s hit Severance, a mash-up of The Office and Lost, complete with a quirky cast, rich character development, and mysterious details that lend themselves to Reddit theories. ...
Few of us would trust a corporation to insert allegedly irremovable hardware into our skulls, bifurcating our beings into “innies” (work selves) and “outies” (life selves). But many of us have experienced heartbreak so profound it tempts us to drastic measures in pursuit of relief. ... “We don’t want to experience anything unpleasant,” said Dichen Lachman, the actress who plays Mark’s late wife (and Lumon’s test subject) in a recent interview. “We kind of want to get on a prescription of not having to suffer.”
The Christian life both acknowledges the inevitability of suffering and offers consolation.
March 23, 2025 in Faith, Legal Education | Permalink
Abraham Lincoln, The Civil War, And Faith
Wall Street Journal Book Review: Amanda Brickell Bellows (The New School; Google Scholar), Calling Heaven to the Union’s Cause (reviewing Richard Carwardine (Oxford), Righteous Strife: How Warring Religious Nationalists Forged Lincoln's Union (2025)):
As a young man in Illinois, Abraham Lincoln was a religious skeptic. Raised in the Presbyterian Church, he would later decline to attend services and publicly question Christianity’s central tenets. But when the Civil War broke out following his election to the presidency, Lincoln underwent a spiritual transformation.
In “Righteous Strife,” Richard Carwardine explores how Lincoln’s faith shaped his actions during the Civil War and how the nation responded to his decisions. Mr. Carwardine, an emeritus Rhodes professor of American history at Oxford University, tackles a topic many Civil War scholars have tended to overlook: the influence of faith in wartime politics and nationalism. To understand how Lincoln and the broader populace viewed the Civil War and slavery through the lens of religion, Mr. Carwardine has studied underused primary sources, including pamphlets, sermons, church reports and newspapers. He argues that Lincoln’s “wartime religious turn” prompted the president to issue “executive action to upend the historic social order” and that, for many Americans, “the interpenetration of politics and religion became the wartime norm.” ...
When the Civil War began, many Americans interpreted the conflict from a faith-based perspective. Mr. Carwardine finds that Lincoln intensified “his inquiry into the spiritual and religious dimensions of humankind” over the next four years, viewing God as a power who directly intervened in human events. ...
Throughout the ... war, Lincoln conversed with Catholic, Jewish and Protestant Americans to understand their perspectives and consider how popular opinion ought to shape his policies. In the autumn of 1864, Lincoln was re-elected for another term. During his second inaugural address he quoted from Scripture and, Mr. Carwardine observes, “reflected on the purposes of an Almighty God and His judgment on the American nation.”
March 23, 2025 in Book Club, Faith, Legal Education | Permalink
The False Battle Between Justice And Mercy
Dispatch Faith: The False Battle Between Justice and Mercy, by Michael Reneau (Managing Editor, The Dispatch) & Karen Swallow Prior:
If you were to base your understanding of mercy and justice on reading recent headlines, you’d get the distinct impression that they are two teams competing in a cosmic Super Bowl and the rest of the world is just placing bets, with one winner taking all.
But the countervailing demands of the virtues of justice and mercy do not present a zero-sum game. Justice without mercy is not just. Mercy apart from justice is not merciful. If we understand the nature of virtue in general ... we can better understand how these particular virtues are mutually dependent, and how we can achieve one only when we achieve the other. ...
A virtue consists of the proper balance of a particular quality between its excess and its deficiency, and a vice is too much or too little of an otherwise good quality or characteristic. Too much confidence, for example, is the vice of vanity. Too little is the vice of timidity. Healthy pride embraces the human dignity that belongs to us all. Lack of effort is sloth, and too much effort is frenzy, but moderation between these two extremes achieves the virtue of diligence. A lack of courage is the vice of cowardice. An excess of the same quality becomes brazenness or recklessness. Doing harm through recklessness, even in the process of attempting to do good, fails the test of courage. Similarly, justice and mercy require avoiding both excess and deficiency. ...
March 23, 2025 in Faith, Legal Education | Permalink
Regent Law School Dean Brad Lingo Named President Of Grove City College
Grove City College Announces Selection of Bradley J. Lingo ’00 as 10th President:
Grove City College today announced the selection of Bradley J. Lingo ’00 as the College’s tenth president, following a unanimous vote of the Board of Trustees. Lingo, who graduated summa cum laude from Grove City College in 2000, has a distinguished record in law and academia and a compelling vision to build on Grove City College’s 150-year legacy as a highly distinctive Christian liberal arts college of extraordinary value.
“Brad rose to the top of the search committee’s deep candidate pool because of a unique combination of experience and characteristics that make him the right leader for the next chapter of Grove City College’s story,” said Edward D. Breen ’78, chair of the Grove City College Board of Trustees and the Board’s Presidential Search Committee. “He brings a vibrant commitment to Christian orthodoxy, tight alignment with the College’s conservative vision and character, extraordinary professional experience and sophistication, and a keen understanding of higher education and the challenges and opportunities facing Grove City College.”
Lingo currently serves as the dean of Regent University School of Law. Under his leadership, Regent Law has set records for enrollment, median incoming GPA and LSAT scores, U.S. News rankings, and employment outcomes. Lingo will complete the academic year at Regent before joining Grove City College in July 2025. A formal inauguration will occur later in the academic year.
March 23, 2025 in Faith, Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
Straight, White Female Loses Bias Claim Over King & Spalding's Summer Associate Diversity Program
Following up on my previous posts:
-
Straight, White Female Alleges King & Spalding's Summer Associate Diversity Fellowship Violated Title VII (May 21, 2024)
- King & Spalding Fights Bias Suit By Straight, White Female Over Summer Associate Diversity Fellowship Program (Sept. 28, 2024)
ABA Journal, Judge Tosses Bias Suit Over BigLaw Firm's Diversity Hiring Program for Summer Associates:
A straight, white female lawyer can’t sue King & Spalding over exclusion from a diversity hiring program for summer associates because of a “paucity of allegations” that she was ready and able to apply, a federal judge ruled Monday.
The plaintiff, Sarah Spitalnick, said she didn’t apply for the position while she was a 1L at the University of Baltimore School of Law because she thought that it would have been a futile gesture. The February 2021 job ad that she saw for the program said candidates “must have an ethnically or culturally diverse background or be a member of the LGBT community.”
But U.S. District Judge James K. Bredar of the District of Maryland said mere allegations about being ready and able to apply aren’t enough. Spitalnick’s lawsuit says nothing about steps that she took to apply or inquire about the position or about considering similar positions, he said [Spitalnick v. King & Spalding, No. 24-1367 D. MD 2025)].
March 23, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
The Top Five New Tax Papers
There is a bit of movement in this week's list of the Top 5 Recent Tax Paper Downloads, with new papers debuting on the list at #1 and #4.
[986 Downloads] Tax Fairness: Reconceptualising Taxation and Inequalities, by Rita de la Feria (Leeds; Google Scholar)
- [708 Downloads] The Role Of Unrealized Gains And Borrowing In The Taxation Of The Rich, by Edward Fox (Michigan; Google Scholar) & Zachary Liscow (Yale; Google Scholar)
- [372 Downloads] The Legality of Charitable Remedial Discrimination, by Roger Colinvaux (Catholic University)
- [225 Downloads] Global Tax Wars in the Digital Era, by Assaf Harpaz (Georgia; Google Scholar) (reviewed by Mirit Eyal-Cohen (Alabama; Google Scholar) here)
- [223 Downloads] Public International Law and Tax Law: A Fair and Equitable Nexus in International Taxation, by Pasquale Pistone (IBFD, Vienna; Google Scholar), Sam van der Vlugt (IBFD, Erasmus; Google Scholar) & Mariya Serafimova (European Court of Justice)
Editor's Note: If you would like to receive a daily email with links to tax posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here.
March 23, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship, Top 5 Downloads | Permalink
Saturday, March 22, 2025
This Week's Ten Most Popular TaxProf Blog Posts
- Bloomberg Law, California Bar Recommends Provisional Licensure For All Who Failed And Withdrew From The February Bar Exam
- The Recorder, California Bar Blocked Law School Deans And Professors From Vetting Troubled Bar Exam
- Paul Caron (Dean, Pepperdine), 80% Through The Fall 2025 Law School Admissions Season: Applicants Are Up 20% (Black Applicants Are Up 30%)
- Reuters, Summer Associate Hiring Hit All-Time Low In 2024; 78% Of 2025 Summer Associate Offers Were Made Before August 1
- Wall Street Journal, The Competition To Get Into Law School Is Brutal This Year
- Will Monroe, Tracy Norton & Susan Tanner (LSU), Law Profs’ Generative AI Sandbox
- preLaw, The Best Law Schools For Practical Training
- Chronicle of Higher Education, The Diversity Detective: Cornell Law Prof Is Committed To Rooting Out Race Consciousness From Higher Ed
- New York Times, Yale Law School Suspends Scholar After A.I.-Powered News Site Accuses Her Of Terrorist Link
- ABA Journal, State Bar Of California Announces Remediation Actions For The February Bar Exam And Plans For The July Bar Exam
Editor's Note: If you would like to receive a daily email with links to legal education posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here.
Tax:
- Tax Workshops:
- Heather Evans (Canadian Tax Foundation), Tim Fitzsimmons (Fasken, Ontario) & Josh Jones (Blakes, Toronto) At Toronto, Clearing Skies in the Forecast: Is Tax Administration the Road to Simplification?
- Rebecca Kysar (Fordham) At San Diego, The Stakes of the Global Tax Deal For International Economic Governance
- Michael Strain (American Enterprise Institute) At Georgetown, Protectionism is Failing and Wrongheaded: An Evaluation of the Post-2017 Shift Toward Trade Wars and Industrial Policy
- Kathleen DeLaney Thomas (North Carolina) At Duke, Tax and the Myth of the Family Farm
- Alex Zhang (Emory) At Missouri, The Other Taxation
- John Brooks (Fordham) & David Gamage (Missouri), The Original Meaning Of The Sixteenth Amendment
- Manoj Viswanathan (UC Law-SF), Damage Award Taxation And Distributive Justice
- Yale Budget Lab, ‘Buy-Borrow-Die’: Reforming The Tax Treatment Of Borrowing Against Appreciated Assets
- Anthony Infanti (Pittsburgh), Taxation And Slavery In Colonial America
- SSRN, The Top Five New Tax Papers
- Pittsburgh Tax Review, New Issue
- Paul Caron (Dean, Pepperdine), New Tax Articles
- Mirit Eyal-Cohen (Alabama), Review Of Global Tax Wars In The Digital Era By Assaf Harpaz (Georgia)
- Luís Calderón Gómez (Cardozo) & Mitchell Kane (NYU), Coin Taxes
Editor's Note: If you would like to receive a daily email with links to tax posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here.
Faith:
- New York Times (Ruth Graham), The Malcolm Gladwell Of Conservative Christianity
- Inside Higher Ed, Can Faith-Based Colleges (And Law Schools) Use Religious Freedom To Defend Against Trump’s Attacks On DEI?
- Surf Report, Pepperdine Caruso Law’s Nootbaar Institute Co-Sponsors Orthodox Union’s Landmark Conference: Combating Antisemitism Through The Law
- Christianity Today Op-Ed (Phoebe Farag Mikhail), Why Christians Fast During Lent 129
- Wall Street Journal Op-Ed (Gary Saul Morson (Northwestern)), Dostoevsky’s (And Our) Struggle With Faith
The Free Press, Does The West Need A Religious Revival?
Editor's Note: If you would like to receive a weekly email each Sunday with links to faith posts on TaxProf Blog, email me here.
March 22, 2025 in About This Blog, Faith, Legal Education, Tax, Weekly Top 10 TaxProf Blog Posts | Permalink
Hickman & Wildermuth: Harmonizing Delegation And Deference After Loper Bright
Kristin E. Hickman (Minnesota; Google Scholar) & Amy J. Wildermuth (Pittsburgh), Harmonizing Delegation and Deference After Loper Bright, 100 N.Y.U. L. Rev. ___ (2025):
By overturning Chevron, the Supreme Court's Loper Bright decision clearly changed the way in which courts must approach agency actions interpreting statutes. But Loper Bright stopped well short of declaring that courts should always ignore agency interpretations and only interpret statutes using their independent judgment. In two critical paragraphs, the Court acknowledged that some statutory provisions delegate discretionary authority to agencies counseled a more restrained judicial review for reasoned decisionmaking when agencies exercise such power. But, whereas Chevron focused nearly exclusively on the statutory word or phrase that an agency was endeavoring to interpret and implement, Loper Bright shifts the analysis at least initially to the delegations themselves-i.e., the statutory terms that give agencies the authority to act in the first place.
March 22, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink
The Feminist Law Professor Who Wants To Stop Arresting People For Domestic Violence
The Atlantic, The Feminist Law Professor Who Wants to Stop Arresting People for Domestic Violence:
For years, Leigh Goodmark was convinced that the way to keep women safe was through arrests and prosecutions. Now she’s pushing for the opposite.
t’s 10:55 A.M. on a Wednesday, early by law-school standards, and eight students are gathered in a bright seminar room at the University of Maryland’s law school. The students are all women, and each has in front of her an oversized metal water bottle, a cup of coffee, or both. They are dressed comfortably but respectfully: black boots, light sweaters. Their professor, Leigh Goodmark, also wears black boots and an understated sweater, and also sits behind a giant water bottle. For the next hour, no one will look at her phone.
This is the Gender Violence Clinic, one of the most sought-after at the school. Students act as legal representatives for women—most of them incarcerated, many for life, all victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and other forms of gender-related violence. That year, like every year, several students arrived believing that they would be addressing gender violence in the familiar way: by locking up bad men and freeing victimized women. What they found was more complicated. The clinic’s clients are victims but also perpetrators of violence. Some have harmed, or even killed, employers, strangers, sex workers, relatives, even their own children. (Goodmark has since changed the name of the clinic to Gender, Prison, and Trauma to clarify its subject matter for students.) But, instead of calling on law enforcement to protect these women from violence, the students are tasked with protecting them from mistreatment within the criminal-justice system.
March 22, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
Pepperdine Caruso Law Clinical Program Update
Jeff Baker (Pepperdine; Google Scholar), Annual Updates: Pepperdine Caruso Law's Program of Clinical Education:
Through 2024, our clinical program continues to thrive and grow as we advance our vital missions of excellent legal education, deep professional formation, and effective access to justice. The legal clinics at the heart of our enterprise aim to prepare law students to become lawyers who bring light and dignity to the world. In a moment of political polarization, global crises, and national upheaval, we commit to the development of smart, ready, ethical lawyers with hearts and minds for justice and to the promotion of just laws and legal systems.
At the end of 2024 and the beginning of 2025, our communities and neighbors have suffered extraordinary losses from natural disasters. We are rising to meet those needs. Our standing clinics have been flexible and creative to teach students with major disruptions and to continue excellent services to our clients. Our Disaster Relief Clinic and Pro Bono programs have activated immediate programs for community education, lawyer training, and limited-scope clinics in neighborhoods wounded in the fires. Already we have served hundreds of clients and trained hundreds more lawyers. We are taking steps now to expand and deepen this work for Los Angeles for the duration of recovery and rebuilding.
March 22, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education, Pepperdine Legal Ed | Permalink
Applications Are Open For Two ABA Tax Section Fellowships
ABA Tax Section, Tax Analysts Public Service Fellowship:
The application for the 2025-2027 Tax Analysts Public Service Fellowship is now open! Completed applications are due May 15, 2025. Send completed applications to [email protected].
The Tax Analysts Public Service Fellowship was created in response to a need for tax legal assistance for low-income taxpayers, to foster a greater interest in tax-related public service and to provide seasoned attorneys the opportunity to move into the public interest sector.
March 22, 2025 in Legal Education, Tax, Tax Analysts, Tax Daily | Permalink
Friday, March 21, 2025
Weekly SSRN Tax Article Review And Roundup: Kim Reviews Parada's U.N. International Tax Cooperation
This week, Young Ran (Christine) Kim (Cardozo; Google Scholar) reviews a recent article by Leopoldo Parada (King's College London; Google Scholar), U.N. International Tax Cooperation: The Terms of References Final Draft, 116 Tax Notes Int'l 771 (Nov. 4, 2024).
The 30th session of the UN Tax Committee will take place next week from March 24 to March 27, 2025, at the UN Headquarters in New York. The Committee will discuss, among others, the digitalized and globalized economy, UN Model Tax Convention updates, environmental taxation, wealth and solidarity taxes, crypto taxation (where I am a proud member of the ad hoc committee), and the relation of tax to trade and investment. Celebrating 20 years of international tax cooperation at the UN, it is worth examining the proposed U.N. Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, which aims to create a system of international tax cooperation to close gaps in existing tax systems that prevent many countries from collecting much-needed tax revenues. Leopoldo Parada (King's College London; Google Scholar)'s recent article, U.N. International Tax Cooperation: The Terms of References Final Draft, 116 Tax Notes Int'l 771 (Nov. 4, 2024), provides a comprehensive analysis of the final draft of the Terms of Reference (TOR) for the U.N. Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation.
March 21, 2025 in Christine Kim, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship, Weekly SSRN Roundup, Weekly Tax Roundup | Permalink
Weekly Legal Education Roundup
-
ABA Journal, Former George Mason University Law Prof Says He's ‘Fully Vindicated’ After ‘Relatively Modest’ Defamation Suit Settlement
- ABA Journal, State Bar of California Considers Provisional Licenses for February Bar Exam Takers
- American Bar Association, St. Thomas Law School Out Of Compliance With Financial Resources Accreditation Standard
- Bloomberg Law, How AI is Prompting Law Schools to Revise Their Honor Codes
- John Bliss (Denver), Teaching Law in the Age of Generative AI
- Paul Caron (Dean, Pepperdine), 80% Through The Fall 2025 Law School Admissions Season: Applicants Are Up 20% (Black Applicants Are Up 30%)
March 21, 2025 in Legal Education, Scott Fruehwald, Weekly Legal Ed Roundup | Permalink
Tax Policy In The Trump Administration
Bloomberg, Fired IRS Employees Reinstated After Maryland Judge's Order
- Bloomberg, IRS Planned Worker Cuts Would Hit Taxpayer Advocate, Direct File Staff
- Brookings Institution, 199A’s Sunset: A Golden Opportunity to Rethink Business Taxation
- Cato Institute, Tax Expenditure Madness Bracket: Pick the Worst Tax Loophole
- Kimberly Clausing (UCLA), What’s the Deal With Tariffs?
- Dēmos, Taxing Income versus Wealth: U.S. Tax Code Widens the Racial Wealth Divide
- Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, Shelter Skelter: How the Educational Choice for Children Act Would Use Tax Avoidance to Fuel School Privatization
- New York Times, The Budget Trick the G.O.P. Might Use to Make a $4 Trillion Tax Cut Look Free
March 21, 2025 in Tax, Tax Daily, Tax News, Tax Policy in the Trump Administration | Permalink
Next Week’s Tax Workshops
Monday, March 24: Luís Carlos Calderón Gómez (Cardozo; Google Scholar) will present Coin Taxes, 16 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. __ (2025) (with Mitchell Kane (NYU; Google Scholar)), as part of the Columbia Davis Polk & Wardwell Tax Policy Colloquium. If you would like to attend, please contact Michael Love.
Tuesday, March 25: Janet Holtzblatt (Tax Policy Center) will present Measuring Success: New Performance Metrics for a New Internal Revenue Service as part of the Georgetown Tax Law and Public Finance Workshop. If you would like to attend, please contact Brian Galle and Day Manoli.
Thursday, March 27: Stephen Shay (Boston College; Google Scholar) will present The UTPR and Double Tax Treaties: Does the UTPR Violate OECD Model Capital Ownership Non-discrimination? as part of the Toronto James Hausman Tax Law and Policy Workshop Series. If you would like to attend, please contact Ben Alarie.
Friday, March 28: Assaf Harpaz (Georgia; Google Scholar) will present Artificial Intelligence and Taxpayer Entity as part of the Case Western Journal of Law, Technology & the Internet (JOLTI) Symposium. If you would like to attend, please register here.
March 21, 2025 in Colloquia, Legal Education, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship, Tax Workshops | Permalink
ABA Finds St. Thomas Law School Out Of Compliance With Financial Resources Accreditation Standard
Council of the ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar, Notice of Finding of Noncompliance With Standard 202, St. Thomas University Benjamin L. Crump College of Law (Feb. 2025):
At its February 20-21, 2025, meeting, the Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar of the American Bar Association (the “Council”) considered the status of St. Thomas University Benjamin L. Crump College of Law (the “Law School”) and concluded that the Law School is not in compliance with Standard 202(b) ["A law school shall maintain a budget reflecting anticipated financial resources and expenses for the current and subsequent three fiscal years. For law schools that are part of a university, the budget must reflect any anticipated obligations of the law school to the university or of the university to the law school."].
In accordance with Rule 51(b)(6), the Managing Director shall provide public notification of the Council’s conclusions and decision concerning a law school’s noncompliance, under Rule 11(a)(4), with one or more of the Core Standards. Pursuant to Rule 15, Standard 202 (Resources for Program) is a Core Standard. Consequently, pursuant to Internal Operating Practice 5 of the ABA Standards and Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools, this public memorandum is being issued within one business day of the time the Law School was notified of the Council’s decision.
The Law School has been asked to submit a report by September 26, 2025, and to appear before the Council at its February 2026 meeting. The Council will consider the written report at its November 13-15, 2025, meeting. If the information provided in the written report demonstrates compliance with Standard 202(b), then the Council will find the Law School to be in compliance with Standard 202(b) and cancel the hearing.
ABA Journal, St. Thomas College of Law Falls Out of Compliance With ABA Accreditation Standard Focused on Financial Resources:
March 21, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
ATPI And Pace Conference: Tax Law, The Environment, And Climate Change
The American Tax Policy Institute (ATPI) and Pace Law host a conference today and tomorrow on Tax Law, the Environment, and Climate Change (agenda):
The American Tax Policy Institute and Pace | Haub Law Conference on Tax Law, the Environment, and Climate Change is a two-day conference featuring a variety of insightful panels focusing on pressing environmental concerns and the use of tax law to advance sustainability. Panelists and moderators will consist of leaders in tax law, environmental law, and other prominent members of academia.
Friday, March 21
Panel I: Climate Change and the Inflation Reduction Act: How WeGot Here (9:15 AM - 10:30 AM)
Passed in 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 contained multiple tax incentives designed to encourage the growth of the so-called “clean energy economy.” Through tax credits and incentives, the government stood to make a $400 billion investment in climate change mitigation and adaptation. However, the first few months of the new presidential administration have seen the rollback of environmental regulations, the freezing of funds for clean energy, the withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Agreement, and a commitment to growing the fossil fuel industry. This panel will explore what led to the Inflation Reduction Act and whether it retains any vitality. Given the dismantling of governmental committees and bodies responsible for collecting and reporting accurate financial and economic data, how can lawyers, accountants, economists, and others continue to work on energy-related matters? What challenges will there be in assessing the impact of any past or future spending? What lessons can be drawn from the withdrawal of the United States from a major international treaty on climate change?
- Michael D. Hamersky (Pace) (moderator)
- Neil Mehrotra (Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis; Google Scholar), Economic Implications of the Climate Provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act (with John Bistline (Electric Power Research Institute; Google Scholar) & Catherine Wolfram (MIT; Google Scholar))
- Adam Orford (Georgia; Google Scholar), The Ongoing Need for Spending Impact Assessment
- Gabriel Weil (Touro; Google Scholar), Climate Nationalism
- Genevieve Tokic (Northwestern), Environmental Tax Incentives: Lessons from the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (So Far)
Panel II: Carbon Tax and Other Pricing Proposals (11:00 AM - 12:15 PM)
March 21, 2025 in Conferences, Legal Education, Tax, Tax Conferences, Tax Daily | Permalink
Thursday, March 20, 2025
Gómez & Kane: Coin Taxes
Luís Calderón Gómez (Cardozo; Google Scholar) & Mitchell Kane (NYU), Coin Taxes, 16 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. ___ (2025):
New kinds of private money are thriving, with increasing circulation, growing acceptance, and rapid technological innovation. But this new suffers from an old problem: bank runs. Bank runs can destabilize even well-regulated and healthy banks, and their contagion can catalyze and amplify a system-wide financial crisis. Since the 1930s, policymakers have sought to protect our financial system from bank runs through public deposit insurance and other emergency response mechanisms. Those historically effective policy tools, however, are critically unavailable or ineffective in the context of these new types of money. As a result, these new types of money remain critically vulnerable to bank runs, and the potential for financial contagion from their failure poses catastrophic risks to society.
March 20, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink
After Disastrous Bar Exam Rollout, California Supreme Court To Boost Test Oversight
Reuters, After Disastrous Bar Exam Rollout, California Supreme Court to Boost Test Oversight:
The California Supreme Court will step up its oversight of the state’s lawyer admissions following the chaotic February bar exam, Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero said during her annual State of the Judiciary address [transcript; video].
The February exam — the debut of a hybrid in person and remote exam without any of the components of the national bar exam California has used for decades — was marred by widespread technical and logistical problems. Some test takers were unable to log in to the exam at all, while others faced delays, computer crashes, lax exam security, distracting proctors, and a copy-and-paste function that didn’t work. ...
“It is literally life-changing for many students,” Guerrero said of the bar exam during her Tuesday address. “The additional stress, frustration and anxiety faced by some examinees is inexcusable.” ...
March 20, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
Yale: ‘Buy-Borrow-Die’: Reforming The Tax Treatment Of Borrowing Against Appreciated Assets
Yale Budget Lab, “Buy-Borrow-Die": Options for Reforming the Tax Treatment of Borrowing Against Appreciated Assets:
Designing a potential extension of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) is the central tax policy question facing Congress in 2025. Because a straightforward extension of the TCJA would come with a fiscal cost of more than $4 trillion over ten years, lawmakers and policy experts have expressed interest in incorporating additional revenue-raising provisions into an extension package—often with a focus on areas where fundamental reform would be beneficial.
One such area is the so-called "buy-borrow-die" strategy, a tax planning technique which allows wealthy Americans to pay low tax rates on consumed income, a tax planning technique which allows wealthy Americans to pay low tax rates on consumed income, creates horizontal inequities, and distorts portfolio allocation decisions. Buy-borrow-die has attracted growing attention from economists, legal scholars, and politicians seeking ways to reform how capital gains are taxed in the US.
March 20, 2025 in Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship, Think Tank Reports | Permalink
The Diversity Detective: Cornell Law Prof Is Committed To Rooting Out Race Consciousness From Higher Ed
Chronicle of Higher Education, The Diversity Detective: William A. Jacobson Is Committed to Rooting Race Consciousness From Higher Ed, One Program at a Time:
William A. Jacobson thinks America has a race problem.
Anti-Black racism, the Cornell University law professor says, is wildly exaggerated. Some Black Lives Matter activists are anti-American fascists. And it’s white people who are now more likely to be the victims of discrimination.
In 2020, students, alumni, and law professors tried — unsuccessfully — to get Jacobson fired for a series of blog posts they perceived as creating a hostile learning environment for Black students. Undeterred, Jacobson started one of the nation’s most aggressive campaigns to suss out and report race-conscious programs in higher education.
He and three other lawyers have filed 60 complaints with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights against identity-focused programs and scholarships. That includes an MBA fellowship program for Latino students, a George Floyd memorial scholarship for Black students, and a training course exclusively for white parents to learn how to fight white supremacy. Of those 60 complaints, 35 cases resulted in schools and colleges changing eligibility requirements for various programs or ending them altogether.
Jacobson manages four websites, publishes a weekly podcast, has written op-eds in The New York Times, and has been featured on Fox News more than 10 times. He has mobilized dozens of professors from across the country to track on his website criticalrace.org hundreds of social-justice statements, staff diversity trainings, and courses he says indoctrinate students with false ideas about American racism. His site has been cited more than 170 times by mainstream-media outlets.
The Legal Insurrection Foundation, Jacobson’s nonprofit, collected $1.2 million in revenue from donations and grants in 2023, according to tax filings. It’s not clear who has donated to his cause.
“There is no good that can come in our universities or our society by making people focus on their skin color and their ethnicity and by doling out particularly government-funded benefits based on race or ethnicity,” Jacobson said in an interview. “I think it’s setting people against each other, and it is not advancing us.”
March 20, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
How AI Is Prompting Law Schools To Revise Their Honor Codes
Bloomberg Law, How AI is Prompting Law Schools to Revise Their Honor Codes:
Law schools are updating their honor codes to cover use of artificial intelligence in response to students’ rapid uptake of AI.
The changes come as generative AI is transforming legal research and writing, in all facets of the practice of law. In response, law schools are embracing AI education—from coursework to clinics.
But, increasingly popular AI tools—including those embedded in legal research software—combined with a lack of clear guidelines create the risk of ethical issues. As law schools wrestle with how best to educate students on the technology while controlling for dishonesty, school policies range from explicit bans on generative AI use, to allowing professors to set their own rules within limits.
March 20, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
2024 IFA International Tax Student Writing Award; Call For Entrants In 2025 Competition
The winners of the International Fiscal Association's 2024 International Tax Student Writing Competition are:
Emily Lawson (Temple), EITC For ITIN-Holders: Bilateral International Tax Treaty Nondiscrimination Articles To The Rescue
Faculty Sponsor: Alice Abreu
The field of international tax stands as one of the most complicated and intricate parts of the tax law, and the study of the interpretations of the nondiscrimination article of tax treaties is no exception to that general observation. Leading tax treaty scholars have described the nondiscrimination article as “a most confusing area of the tax law.”188 However, the IRS interpretations and positions on the importance of residency make clear that the nondiscrimination article requires equal treatment of US citizens and Resident Aliens. The residency factor analysis would provide a sound argument for an undocumented Resident Alien—who otherwise qualifies for the EITC and is a national of a treaty-partner state—to seek redress from the IRS in the form of a refund suit or if necessary, escalating through the mutual agreement procedure provided in the treaty.
Even without a treaty, undocumented immigrants without SSNs should be able to claim the EITC if they otherwise qualify. Consider again the two identical taxpayers described above. Both live and work in this country, support their families, and pay taxes but only one of them—the SSN-holder—has been deemed worthy of EITC support. The disparate treatment of ITIN-holders was on full display during the COVID-19 pandemic as ITIN-holders were denied stimulus payments. Accordingly, some US states began to take notice of this injustice, like California and Colorado, and expanded their state-level EITC to ITIN-holders. Since 2020, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington have all expanded their EITC to include ITIN-holders.
The states that have expanded their EITC recognize the value of supporting immigrant workers and their families. California governor, Gavin Newsom, described the expanded EITC as providing “a critical boost to undocumented and mixed-status families across the state, stimulat[ing] the economy and make[ing] us all stronger in the face of economic uncertainty.” He rightly went on to say, “these Californians are taxpayers and should be treated like taxpayers, eligible for the same credits, and pay the same tax rates.”193 Congress should follow suit in expanding the federal EITC to include ITIN-holders not only to comply with tax treaties but more importantly, in recognition of the contributions of undocumented immigrants who deserve fair treatment.
Seth Stowe (Virginia), Circularity and Creditability: Breaking Down Notice 2023-80
Faculty Sponsor: Ruth Mason
March 20, 2025 in Legal Education, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship, Teaching | Permalink
Wednesday, March 19, 2025
Tax Workshops: Zhang At Missouri, Thomas At Duke, Evans At Toronto
Alex Zhang (Emory; Google Scholar) presents The Other Taxation at Missouri today as part of its Tax Policy Colloquium hosted by David Gamage:
Native Americans pay taxes. The territories do not. Both live with the legacy of American imperialism. Both seek the elusive fiscal self-governance and autonomy promised by Congress. The Supreme Court—through preemption, the plenary-power doctrine, and tax interpretive principles—has hollowed out the Native tax base, forcing tribes to compete fiercely with Congress, states, and localities for revenue. By contrast, territorial residents pay no federal or state taxes by edicts of Congress and geography. This Article argues that the conceptual underpinnings of the divergent tax treatment of tribes and territories are unsound. Under a more robust vision of fiscal autonomy, judicial limits on Native tax sovereignty are misguided. The territories’ wide latitude in designing revenue streams merits heightened scrutiny. While imperfect, a uniform, nonrefundable federal income-tax credit for tribal and territorial taxes paid is a promising path forward. This Article thus provides the first systematic study of subfederal taxation beyond states and localities—the “other” American taxation often overlooked in scholarship.
Kathleen DeLaney Thomas (North Carolina; Google Scholar) presents Tax and the Myth of the Family Farm, 110 Iowa L. Rev. ___ (2024), at Duke tomorrow as part of its Tax Policy Seminar hosted by Larry Zelenak:
March 19, 2025 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship, Tax Workshops | Permalink
Federal Judge Questions Wayne State's Refusal To Allow Blind Law Student To Take Classes Online
Following up on my previous post, Blind Law Student Sues Wayne State For Failure To Accommodate Her Disability: Law360, Law School's Remote Learning Stance Baffles Mich. Judge:
A Michigan federal judge said Thursday it "makes no sense" that Wayne State University Law School couldn't allow a student with a disability to attend classes virtually, pressing an attorney for the university as to why the school couldn't do so, considering it had gone fully remote during the COVID-19 pandemic.
U.S. District Judge Robert White said it "makes no sense to me in the post-Covid climate" that remote learning would be a fundamental alteration to the education the school provides, when students were fully or predominately remote for an extended period during the pandemic. The judge said he was having a hard time understanding how Hind Omar's request to do distance learning would be an unreasonable accommodation.
The university had claimed Omar's request to attend classes virtually would impose a fundamental alteration on the law school's program, which included the interactive, participation-based method of Socratic teaching. The Americans with Disabilities Act does not require institutions to provide accommodations that would impose a fundamental alteration to the program.
"If Wayne State conducted Socratic methods over Zoom or … whatever hosting software … for years, it's hard to understand there's this magical substantive difference that takes place between one student learning virtually," the judge said.
March 19, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
Tahk: A Tale Of Two Credits
Susannah Camic Tahk (Wisconsin; Google Scholar), A Tale of Two Credits:
This Essay considers the relationship between the child tax credit and the earned income tax credit in an era where the child tax credit has taken center stage. Accounts of the U.S. welfare state often conceive of its political support as inherently limited. Programs with anti-poverty missions face a restricted supply of legislative interest and public regard. In the CTC and the EITC though, the tax code currently incorporates two major anti-poverty programs. To what extent do the two programs compete for political resources? Insofar as they do, which is winning, and why? How might we expect their relative trajectories to move in the future? This Essay investigates those questions using legislative history, program data, and a novel survey experiment.
March 19, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink
Teaching Law In The Age of Generative AI
John Bliss (Denver; Google Scholar), Teaching Law in the Age of Generative AI, 64 Jurimetrics 111 (2024):
With the rise of large language models capable of passing law school exams and the Uniform Bar Exam, how should legal educators prepare their students for an age of transformative technological change? As text-generating AI is being integrated in legal research platforms and word processing software, which automate the drafting of legal documents based on human prompts, lawyers are increasingly adopting this technology as a standard tool of legal research and writing. This Article explores the implications of these developments for legal education, focusing on pedagogy, curriculum, and assessment.
March 19, 2025 in Legal Ed Scholarship, Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink
The Best Law Schools For Practical Training
The Best Law Schools For Practical Training, preLaw (Spring 2025):
Preparing students for practice is the signature goal of many law schools. We spotlight 64 schools that excel when it comes to providing hands-on, practical experience through clinics, externships and other offerings. ...
March 19, 2025 in Law School Rankings, Legal Ed Rankings, Legal Education, Pepperdine Legal Ed | Permalink
ABA Tax Section Hosts Webinar Today On Careers In Tax Law
The ABA Tax Section hosts a webinar today at noon ET on Beyond the Code: Careers in Tax Law Explained (register):
Join us for an engaging webinar featuring three experienced tax practitioners as they share their career journeys, offer insights into the world of tax law, and provide advice for law students exploring this dynamic and rewarding field. This is your chance to hear directly from professionals about the opportunities and challenges of working in tax law—and to ask your burning questions about the profession. Don't miss this opportunity to gain invaluable career advice and inspiration!
Speakers:
March 19, 2025 in ABA Tax Section, Legal Ed News, Legal Education, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax News | Permalink
Tuesday, March 18, 2025
Tax Workshops: Strain At Georgetown, Kysar At San Diego
Michael Strain (American Enterprise Institute) presents Protectionism is Failing and Wrongheaded: An Evaluation of the Post-2017 Shift Toward Trade Wars and Industrial Policy at Georgetown as part of the Tax Law and Public Finance Workshop hosted by Brian Galle and Day Manoli.
The Trump–Pence and Biden–Harris administrations enthusiastically embraced protectionism. Each administration explicitly argued for a break from the bipartisan consensus of recent decades that has been generally supportive of free trade and of allowing markets to shape US industrial and employment composition. But the protectionism of the Trump and Biden administrations has not succeeded and likely will not succeed at meeting its goals: they have caused manufacturing employment to decline, not to increase; they have not reduced the overall trade deficit; they have not led to a substantial decoupling of the US and Chinese economies. More fundamentally, the goals that have not been met are wrongheaded: policymakers should not pay inordinate attention to manufacturing employment, and the trade deficit is a poor guide to economic policy. Finally, these wrongheaded goals often rest on fundamental economic misperceptions: free trade is not a policy to create jobs; it is a policy to increase productivity, wages, and consumption. The balance of the evidence suggests that free trade, including trade with China, has not reduced employment. Of course, trade has been disruptive. But populist policies adopted in response will hurt workers, not help them.
Rebecca Kysar (Fordham; Google Scholar) delivers the annual Richard Crawford Pugh Lecture on Tax Law & Policy at San Diego today on The Stakes of the Global Tax Deal For International Economic Governance, 77 Tax L. Rev. ___ (2024) (reviewed by Adam Rosenzweig (Washington University) here):
March 18, 2025 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship, Tax Workshops | Permalink
Former George Mason Law Prof Says He's ‘Fully Vindicated,’ But He Faces Possible Sanctions Under Anti-SLAPP Statute
ABA Journal, Former George Mason University Law Prof Says He's ‘Fully Vindicated’ After ‘Relatively Modest’ Defamation Suit Settlement:
A former professor at the George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School has reached a settlement in his defamation lawsuit against two former students who alleged that he abused his power to initiate sexual relationships with them when they were law students. ...
Wright had maintained that the relationships were consensual, and the two women were “scorned former lovers.” In a statement released to Law360, he said he is “relieved to have been fully vindicated. The evidence has made it undeniably clear that the relationships in question were consensual from the start. I remain fully committed to defending my reputation and will not hesitate to take further legal action if necessary to hold accountable those responsible for false accusations.”
National Law Journal, In Settlement on Eve of Trial, Ex-GMU Scalia Law Professor Ends Defamation Lawsuit Against Accuser:
March 18, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
Trump DEI Mandate And Staff Cuts Threaten IRS Effort To End Racial Bias
Bloomberg, IRS Effort to End Racial Bias Threatened by Trump DEI Mandate:
Diane Lim hadn’t even finished putting together her team at the Treasury Department’s Equity Hub before she got the notice from the Trump administration forcing her group to go on administrative leave within days of the January inauguration.
The Treasury Equity Hub is one casualty of President Donald Trump’s executive order to end federal diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, and eliminating it means there’s one less group of people working to end racial bias in audits—a problem researchers uncovered in 2023 that alarmed congressional Democrats. Trump’s sweeping executive order likely stalled efforts to fix that bias, which might perpetuate an unequal tax system and erode taxpayers’ trust, tax professionals said.
And now the goal to cut the IRS workforce in half complicates the racial bias work further.
March 18, 2025 in IRS News, Legal Education, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax News | Permalink
State Bar Of California Announces Remediation Actions For The February Bar Exam And Plans For The July Bar Exam
Following up on Sunday's post, California Bar Recommends Provisional Licensure For All Who Failed And Withdrew From The February Bar Exam: ABA Journal, State Bar of California Considers Provisional Licenses for February Bar Exam Takers:
The State Bar of California’s Committee of Bar Examiners has placed the option of provisional licenses for candidates who fail or withdrew from the February California bar exam on the table. ...
[T]he ongoing outcry by February bar candidates concerning a variety of issues—including delayed start times, technical glitches, grammatical and factual errors in the questions, rampant cheating, proctors arguing and fellow test-takers screaming out of frustration—has forced the state bar to consider remedies.
Reuters, California Bar Says No Quick Fix for Botched Exam:
There will be no swift resolution to California’s bar exam mess, it seems. The State Bar of California cannot make decisions about how to deal with the test scores on its disastrous February exam for at least nine weeks, the time it takes to grade the exams, bar staff and standardized test experts said on Friday.
California State Bar Email (Mar. 14, 2025):
Dear Person,
Today, the State Bar’s Committee of Bar Examiners (CBE) met to discuss the February 2025 bar exam and possible remediation efforts. Below are the key updates from today’s meeting:
Remediation Efforts
- Provisional Licensure Recommendation: The committee resolved to recommend "to the Board of Trustees that the Supreme Court expand the Provisional Licensure Program to include test takers who took the February 2025 bar exam or who withdrew from the February 2025 bar exam.” A specially set meeting of the Board of Trustees will be scheduled to consider the recommendation.
- Score Adjustments: The committee also took action to make it possible for it to recommend score adjustments to the Supreme Court as soon as possible, resolving “that if the timing for making a recommendation on any scoring adjustment for the February 2025 Bar Exam does not align with a regularly scheduled meeting of the committee, and a meeting of the committee cannot be timely scheduled, the committee delegates authority to make a recommendation on scoring adjustments to the Chair and Vice Chair.” The resolution also states that “any such action shall be guided by the mission of public protection.” The State Bar’s psychometricians presented to the committee possible adjustments that address the issues faced during the exam. Additional time is needed to complete analyses to determine what may be most appropriate.
The committee also discussed:
March 18, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
Summer Associate Hiring Hit All-Time Low In 2024; 78% Of 2025 Summer Associate Offers Were Made Before August 1
Reuters, Law Firms Chopped Summer Associate Jobs to Record Low and Recruited Earlier Than Ever, Report Shows:
Law firm summer associate hiring hit an all-time low in 2024, as firms took a "conservative" recruiting approach, according to the National Association for Law Placement.
The total number of summer associate offers was down slightly compared with the 11-year low of 2023, while the median number of summer associate offers per law firm office fell to six in 2024 from seven in 2023 — the lowest since NALP began tracking that figure in 1993. The average number of summer associate offers, which law firms made to second-year law students, held steady at 22. ...
March 18, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
Wallace & Davis: Brief Of Amici Curiae Tax Professors In South Carolina Amazon Case
Clint Wallace (South Carolina; Google Scholar) & Tessa Davis (South Carolina), Brief of Amici Curiae Tax Law Professors for the South Carolina Supreme Court in Support of Respondent:
In this appeal, Petitioner Amazon Services, LLC challenges the holding of the Administrative Law Court, as affirmed by the Court of Appeals, that Amazon is a “retailer” or “seller” under the South Carolina tax statute that was in effect prior to 2019. That holding properly confirmed the authority of Respondent South Carolina Department of Revenue to collect sales tax from Amazon for retail sales of third-party merchant-owned products on Amazon’s website.
Amazon has attempted to advance an ahistorical, one-size-fits-all litigation and business strategy that has worked for Amazon in other states—but it has done so here with little or no regard for the specific legal context in South Carolina.
March 18, 2025 in New Cases, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink
Monday, March 17, 2025
Saito Posts Two Tax Papers On SSRN
Blaine Saito (Ohio State; Google Scholar), Tax Contrarians, 58 U. Mich. J.L. Reform ___ (2026):
Taxation is an important part of democratic society, and recent work has focused on how tax aids democracy and the lack of democratic processes in the development of tax policy. One of the concerns is that a loss of democracy in tax policy making processes amplifies certain voices that in turn bend the tax system to their desires and further entrench their power.
But much of the discussion on democracy has focused on areas outside the important development of administrative guidance. This article proposes an intervention to address these concerns. Drawing on some of the literature in administrative law and democratic governance, it proposes a substantive regulatory contrarian within the Department of Treasury organized around the ideals of democratic equality and engaging those who are currently not heard in the process of developing administrative guidance. The contrarian would occupy a role of both advocate and bridge, communicating with these outside groups of matters within the agencies and noting when certain asks are unworkable. It also would be required to consult with the IRS and Treasury before they issue regulations and have the ability to comment on administrative guidance. Furthermore, should the contrarian provide clear reasoning and demonstrate strong engagement with outside groups, and should Treasury and the IRS adopt significant parts of the contrarian’s proposals, it should serve as a means to persuade courts in supporting Treasury’s outcomes.
While it is a partial and moderate solution, the contrarian could increase participation and likely shift outcomes, especially when paired with interventions other scholars and advocates have proposed. This proposal helps to increase the democratic values within our tax system and its policy making process.
Endowing Democratic Equality in Taxation, 63 Hous. L. Rev. __ (2026):
March 17, 2025 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink
WSJ: The Competition To Get Into Law School Is Brutal This Year
Following up on this morning's post, 80% Through The Fall 2025 Law School Admissions Season: Applicants Are Up 20% (Black Applicants Are Up 30%): Wall Street Journal, The Competition to Get Into Law School Is Brutal This Year:
Applications are surging as students seek stability in a difficult job market.
A weakening white-collar job market and a contentious political climate are fueling interest in law school, leading to one of the most competitive years for would-be law students in recent memory.
The number of applicants to the nation’s nearly 200 law schools is up 20.5% compared with last year. Georgetown University Law Center alone received 14,000 applications to fill 650 spots, while the University of Michigan Law School now has more applications than at any point in its 166 years of existence.
When Michigan Law’s admissions dean, Sarah Zearfoss, shared the numbers with faculty members, “The whole room gasped,” she said.
March 17, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
Legal Ed News Roundup
ABA Journal, California Bar Retake Changes Yet Again As It Moves In Person
- ABA Journal, DEI Standard Prompts Florida To Reconsider ABA Accreditation
- ABA Journal, More First-Time Bar Candidates Passed Exam In 2024, New ABA Data Shows
- ABA Journal, Law Prof Suspended Over Exam Question, Class Discussion Can Sue For First Amendment Retaliation, 7Th Circuit Says
- ABA Journal, Texas Commits To NextGen Bar Exam Starting In 2028, NCBE Says
- ABA Journal, Trump Order Blocks Public Service Loan Forgiveness For Employees Of ‘Activist Organizations’
- America: The Jesuit Review, Trump’s War on DEI Reaches Georgetown Law
March 17, 2025 in Legal Ed News, Legal Education | Permalink
Infanti: Taxation And Slavery In Colonial America
Anthony C. Infanti (Pittsburgh; Google Scholar), The Human Toll: Taxation and Slavery in Colonial America (NYU Press 2025):
The Human Toll documents how the American colonies used tax law to dehumanize enslaved persons, taxing them alongside valuable commodities upon their forced arrival and then as wealth-generating assets in the hands of slaveholders. Anthony C. Infanti examines how taxation also proved to be an important component for subjugating and controlling enslaved persons, both through its shaping of the composition of new arrivals to the colonies and through its funding of financial compensation to slaveholders for the destruction of their “property” to ensure their cooperation in the administration of capital punishment. The variety of tax mechanisms chosen to fund slaveholder compensation payments conveyed messages about who was thought to benefit from―and, therefore, who should shoulder the burden of―slaveholder compensation while opening a revealing window into these colonial societies.
While the story of colonial tax law is intrinsically linked to advancing slavery and racism, Infanti reveals how several colonies used the power of taxation as a means of curtailing the slave trade. Though often self-interested, these efforts show how taxation can be used not only in the service of evil but also to correct societal injustices. Providing a fascinating account of slavery’s economic entrenchment through the history of American tax law, The Human Toll urges us to consider the lessons that fiscal history holds for those working in the reparations movement today.
Reviews
March 17, 2025 in Book Club, Legal Education, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Daily, Tax Scholarship | Permalink