TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, October 20, 2014

Dharmapala Presents Interest Deductions in a Multijurisdictional World Today at Loyola-L.A.

DharmapalaDhammika Dharmapala (Chicago) presents ​Interest Deductions in a Multijurisdictional World at Loyola-L.A. today as part of its Tax Policy Colloquium Series:

The tax treatment of interest expenses in a multijurisdictional setting raises numerous complexities. This paper catalogs these difficulties and highlights the particular problems associated with efforts to achieve ownership neutrality among multinational corporations (MNCs) when debt financing is available. We argue that the differential deductibility of debt entailed by various current tax law provisions leads in general to potential distortions in the patterns of asset ownership across MNCs, and that various proposed solutions have significant limitations. We suggest several alternative regimes to address both the ownership distortions that we highlight, as well as other well-established problems of income-shifting through debt. These alternative regimes are extensions to a multinational setting of two general approaches to the neutral treatment of interest expenses - the CBIT (comprehensive business income tax) and ACC (allowance for corporate capital). These regimes – a worldwide debt cap (WDC) and a net financing deduction (NFD) – provide solutions to income-shifting and ownership distortions. However, they have the potential disadvantage of restricting other policy parameters.

Alexander Wu (UCLA) is the commentator.

October 20, 2014 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Frye: Crowdfunding as a Solution to the Inefficiency of the Charitable Deduction

Brian L. Frye (Kentucky), Solving Charity Failures, 93 Or. L. Rev. 155 (2014):

Kickstarter Logo“Crowdfunding” is a way of using the Internet to raise money by asking the public to contribute to a project. This Article argues that crowdfunding has succeeded, at least in part, because it makes charitable giving more efficient by solving certain “charity failures,” or inefficiencies created by the inability of the charitable contribution deduction to subsidize the charitable giving from low-income donors. The economic subsidy theory of the charitable contribution deduction explains that the deduction is justified because it solves market failures and government failures in charitable goods. According to this theory, free riding causes market failures in charitable goods, and majoritarianism causes government failures in charitable goods. The charitable contribution deduction solves these market and government failures by indirectly subsidizing charitable contributions, thereby compensating for free riding and avoiding majoritarianism. Crowdfunding is successful because it provides a technological solution to some of those charity failures. While the charitable contribution deduction causes charity failures because the deduction cannot subsidize contributions from low-income donors, crowdfunding can subsidize those contributions by offering rewards instead. As a result, crowdfunding should solve at least some of the charity failures caused by the deduction through providing an incentive for low-income donors to contribute. The remarkable success of crowdfunding suggests that the inefficiency associated with charity failures is quite large.

October 20, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Sunday, October 19, 2014

L.A. Times: Ed Kleinbard's We Are Better Than This Is 'Moral and Farsighted'

Los Angeles Times:  On Fiscal Policy, USC Professor's Viewpoint is Moral and Farsighted, by Michael Hiltzik:

We Are Better Than This (2014)The left sees me as a Wall Street Journal Satanist, and the right as a stealth Marxian bent on destroying free enterprise," Edward D. Kleinbard was saying.

The USC law professor was referring to the reactions elicited by his recent op-ed in the New York Times, in which he asserted that the solution to economic inequality in the U.S. was not to make the tax system more progressive — it's already "the most progressive in the developed world," he wrote — but to make it bigger.

As he explained when we met last week at USC's Gould School of Law, where he has taught tax law since 2009, that would render the entire fiscal system more progressive, because it would fund more spending. Government spending is always progressive, benefiting middle- and lower-income people more than the wealthy. So: If you want to reduce inequality, expanding government is more effective than merely increasing the relative burden on the rich.

One can see why left and right alike felt that their shibboleths were being skewered.

But Kleinbard's viewpoint is both moral and farsighted. It's also an important theme of his newly published book, We Are Better Than This: How Government Should Spend Our Money.

Continue reading

October 19, 2014 in Book Club, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (1)

Top 5 Tax Paper Downloads

SSRN LogoThere is quite a bit of movement in this week's list of the Top 5 Recent Tax Paper Downloads on SSRN, with new papers debuting on the list at #2 and #5:

  1. [338 Downloads]  2013 Developments in Connecticut Estate and Probate Law, by Jeffrey A. Cooper (Quinnipiac) & John R. Ivimey (Reid and Riege, Hartford)
  2. [236 Downloads]  Trying Times 2014: Important Lessons to Be Learned from Recent Federal Tax Cases, by Nancy A. McLaughlin (Utah) & Steven J. Small ( Law Office of Stephen J. Small, Newton, MA)
  3. [139 Downloads]  Rights Without Remedies, by Matthew L. M. Fletcher (Michigan State)
  4. [138 Downloads]  Home-Country Effects of Corporate Inversions, by Omri Y. Marian (Florida)
  5. [136 Downloads]  'Show Me the Money!' -- Analyzing the Potential State Tax Implications of Paying Student-Athletes, by Kathryn Kisska-Schulze (North Carolina A&T) & Adam Epstein (Central Michigan)

October 19, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax, Top 5 Downloads | Permalink | Comments (0)

Friday, October 17, 2014

Open Access Legal Scholarship Is Cited 60% More in Law Review Articles, 40% More in Judicial Opinions

James Donovan (Kentucky), Carol Watson (Georgia) & Caroline Osborne (Washington & Lee), The Open Access Advantage for American Law Reviews:

Open AccessOpen access legal scholarship generates a prolific discussion, but few empirical details have been available to describe the scholarly impact of providing unrestricted access to law review articles. The present project fills this gap with specific findings on what authors and institutions can expect.

Articles available in open access formats enjoy an advantage in citation by subsequent law review works of 53%. For every two citations an article would otherwise receive, it can expect a third when made freely available on the Internet. This benefit is not uniformly spread through the law school tiers. Higher tier journals experience a lower OA advantage (11.4%) due to the attention such prestigious works routinely receive regardless of the format. When focusing on the availability of new scholarship, as compared to creating retrospective collections, the aggregated advantage rises to 60.2%. While the first tier advantage rises to 16.8%, the mid-tiers skyrocket to 89.7%. The fourth tier OA advantage comes in at 81.2%.

Figure 5

Citations of legal articles by courts is similarly impacted by OA availability. While the 15-year aggregate advantage is a mere 9.5%, new scholarship is 41.4% more likely to be cited by a court decision if it is available in open access format.

Continue reading

October 17, 2014 in Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink | Comments (0)

Weekly SSRN Tax Roundup

October 17, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax, Weekly SSRN Roundup | Permalink | Comments (0)

Weekly Student Tax Note Roundup

October 17, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax, Weekly Student Tax Note Roundup | Permalink | Comments (0)

ATPI Hosts Conference Today on Taxation and Migration

ATPI Logo (2015)The American Tax Policy Institute hosts a conference today on Taxation and Migration organized by Reuven Avi-Yonah (Michigan) and Joel Slemrod (Michigan) in Washington, D.C.:

The conference assesses the effects of taxation on the migration across national and state boundaries of individuals at various stages of their lives. It will also evaluate whether corporate migrations (such as "inversions") involve migration of individuals, and what are the tax policy implications for the US and other jurisdictions. 

October 17, 2014 in Conferences, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

62nd Annual Montana Tax Institute

62The 62nd Annual Montana Tax Institute kicks off today:

  • Jonathan Blattmachr (ILS Management), Asset Protection and Related Tax Consequences
  • Jessica Browde (Montana), Professional Responsibility in Tax Practice: Circular 230 Update
  • Martin Burke (Montana) & Michael Friel (Florida), Income in Respect of a Decedent: Section 691
  • Sam Donaldson (Georgia State), Annual Federal Income Tax Update
  • Elaine Gagliardi (Montana), Annual Wealth Transfer Tax Update
  • Kristen Juras (Montana), Limitations of Activities of Nonprofit Organizations
  • Roberta Mann (Oregon), Earth, Wind and Fire: Comparing the Taxation of Energy Sources
  • Nancy McLaughlin (Utah), Conservation Easements: Contemporary Issues and Challenges
  • Martin McMahon (Florida), Corporate and Partnership Tax Recent Developments
  • Daniel Simmons (UC-Davis), Impact of Partner and Partnership Liabilities under Subchapter K
  • Chris Treharne, (Gibraltar Business Appraisals), Justifying Discounts for Farm and Ranch Minority Ownership Interests

October 17, 2014 in Conferences, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Thursday, October 16, 2014

Virginia Tax Review Publishes New Issue

Virginia Tax Review (2014)The Virginia Tax Review has published Vol. 33, No. 4 (Spring 2014):

October 16, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Cauble: Relying on the IRS

Emily Cauble (DePaul), Relying on the IRS:

The IRS issues different types of guidance to taxpayers, and the extent to which taxpayers can rely on IRS guidance depends on the form in which it was offered. For instance, taxpayers generally cannot rely on oral advice provided over the phone but can rely on more formal types of advice. The current state of the law harms unsophisticated taxpayers who disproportionately obtain informal advice -- the least reliable type of IRS guidance.

Existing literature lacks a thorough discussion of why, as a policy matter, we allow taxpayers to rely on some forms of IRS guidance more than others. This Article fills that gap by suggesting and critically evaluating potential justifications for this practice.

Continue reading

October 16, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

A Case for Simpler Gain Bifurcation for Real Estate Developers

Florida Tax ReviewBradley T. Borden (Brooklyn), Nathan Brown (Proskauer Rose, Boca Raton) & John Wagner II (Williams Parker Harrison Dietz & Getzen, Sarasota), A Case for Simpler Gain Bifurcation for Real Estate Developers, 15 Fla Tax Rev. 279 (2014):

This Article examines the judicially-sanctioned bifurcation of real estate developers’ gain. The Article recognizes that even though some commentators oppose granting favorable tax treatment to capital gains, the law most likely will not change. With that in mind, the Article examines the all-or-nothing approach of characterizing gain from the sale of real estate as either capital gain or ordinary income. The Article rejects the all-or-nothing approach of characterizing income under the current statutory system. Instead, it embraces gain bifurcation in the second-best setting that taxes capital gains and ordinary income differently. Illustrating the policy justification for gain bifurcation and judicially-sanctioned bifurcation structures, the Article recommends that lawmakers should more fully embrace gain bifurcation for real estate developers by creating a simple statutory election for bifurcating gain that would enhance equity, accuracy, and transparency of gain bifurcation. Although the Article limits its analysis to real estate developers, the idea of gain bifurcation, once improved in this area, could be a catalyst for exploring bifurcation in other areas.

October 16, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Dharmapala: Base Erosion and Profit Shifting -- A Simple Conceptual Framework

Dhammika Dharmapala (Chicago), Base Erosion and Profit Shifting: A Simple Conceptual Framework:

BEPSThe issue of tax-motivated income shifting within multinational firms – or “base erosion and profit shifting” (BEPS) – has attracted increasing global attention and has become the subject of an ongoing OECD initiative. This paper provides a simple conceptual framework that helps to clarify aspects of governments’ responses to the BEPS phenomenon and the potential role of the OECD initiative. An important implication of this framework is that multilateral cooperation of the type envisaged in the BEPS initiative has the potential to reduce the deadweight costs of MNCs’ tax planning and compliance activities, thereby enhancing global welfare. 

October 16, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Penalizing Tax Petitions: Why the Erroneous Refund Penalty in § 6676 Violates Taxpayers’ First Amendment Rights

Derek T. Ho & Christopher Klimmek (both of Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, Washington, D.C.), Penalizing Tax Petitions: Why the Erroneous Refund Penalty in Code § 6676 Violates Taxpayers’ First Amendment Rights, 68 Tax Law. ___ (2015):

In 2007, Congress enacted the so-called “erroneous refund penalty,” which imposes a 20% penalty on any taxpayer who submits a claim for tax refund that the IRS deems “inaccurate,” even if the taxpayer’s position is legally non-frivolous and asserted in good faith. In part because the IRS has rarely imposed the penalty since its enactment, the statute has thus far not been analyzed extensively by legal scholars or policymakers. However, the penalty continues to impose a significant chilling effect on tax refund claims, and the Treasury Department has now signaled the possibility of more aggressive application in the future. This article argues that the erroneous refund penalty is unconstitutional under the Petition Clause of the First Amendment. Penalizing taxpayers financially for asking their government to return money they believe is legally theirs strikes at the heart of the Petition Clause’s protections. Indeed, protecting citizens’ right to complain about abusive taxation by the national Government was one of the Framers’ core motivations for enacting the First Amendment. The article draws on the history of the First Amendment, the Supreme Court’s Petition Clause jurisprudence, and recent lower court decisions in exposing the constitutional infirmity of the penalty. The article also explains that the erroneous refund penalty is unjustified as a matter of tax policy, because it fails to promote voluntary compliance, is irrationally harsh and unfair to taxpayers, and is not necessary to solve the narrow, targeted problems that Congress intended to address in enacting the statute. Finally, the article suggests ways in which the penalty could be amended, if it is not repealed altogether, to avoid infringing on taxpayers’ First Amendment rights and ensure that refund claims are treated fairly.

October 16, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Symposium: Expanding the Boundaries of Legal Education

On TaskSymposium, On Task? Expanding the Boundaries of Legal Education, 65 S.C. L. Rev. 519-638 (2014) (Video):

October 16, 2014 in Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink | Comments (0)

Afield: A Market for Tax Compliance

W. Edward Afield III (Ave Maria), A Market for Tax Compliance, 62 Clev. St. L. Rev. 315 (2014):

It is becoming increasingly clear that, due to political realities and budgetary constraints, the IRS is going to have to attempt to enforce the tax laws by doing more with less. Current enforcement efforts have yielded a tax gap (i.e., the difference between the amount of taxes that should be paid and the amount that are collected) of roughly $450 billion annually. Faced with this task, one of the steps that the IRS has recently taken is to try to improve the quality in services performed by paid tax preparers, a group that historically has been subject to little IRS regulation or monitoring but that continues to play an increasingly important role in the tax system.

Although the IRS’s recent efforts to better regulate paid preparers is a good step in improving the quality of tax services, its current structure as a mandatory regulatory regime causes it to miss a number of compliance oriented advantages that could be achieved through a voluntary system of tax preparer regulation in which tax preparers could choose to seek certifications indicating whether they had a positive track record of compliance.

This paper explores in detail for the first time in the literature how preparer regulation could achieve significantly more compliance gains if it were structured as a voluntary system designed to create a market that rewards tax compliance.

Continue reading

October 16, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Borden Presents REIT Stuff at Florida

BordenBradley T. Borden (Brooklyn) presented REIT Stuff at Florida as part of its Graduate Tax Program Colloquium Series:

Real estate investment trusts (REITs) have made headlines recently because they provide favorable tax treatment to corporations that primarily own real estate, which contrasts with the typical double-tax that generally applies to corporations. The media appears to be particularly concerned that existing corporations are spinning off their real estate holdings into REITs, eroding the corporate tax base. It is also concerned that the IRS has extended REIT classification to entities that hold property, such as telecommunications equipment, billboards, mortgages, oil and gas pipeline systems, timber, casinos, and data centers, which do not fit within the traditional definition of real estate. Such extension broadens the scope of favorable REIT tax treatment to property that was not held in real estate trusts when Congress enacted the REIT regime. Despite all of this attention, the effect of REIT spinoffs and the formation of REITs with non-traditional real estate assets may not have a very significant effect on federal tax revenues. This Article will closely examine the revenue effect of REIT spinoffs and the extension of REIT treatment to non-traditional real estate assets. Early work in this are suggests that the revenue effect appears to be nominal, and it is a result of dual, overlapping tax policies—favorable tax treatment of real estate and tax-exempt status for retirement plans. The analysis will set the stage for discussing potential action in this area by recounting the history of REITs and the important events that have directed the course of REIT legislation to its current status. The early analysis appears to suggest that lawmakers should either reconsider the preference for real estate and pensions or consider relaxing the law to provide more efficient ways for corporations to bifurcate real-estate income from operating income and more easily obtain the benefits available under current law.

October 15, 2014 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

The Need for a Patent Box Tax Regime to Encourage Domestic Manufacturing

Bernard Knight (Partner, McDermott, Will & Emery, Washington, D.C.) & Goud Maragani (Senior Counsel, USPTO), It Is Time for the United States to Implement a Patent Box Tax Regime to Encourage Domestic Manufacturing, 19 Stan. J.L. Bus. & Fin. 39 (2013):

In order to curb the outsourcing of industries and jobs, the United States must provide better incentives to encourage manufacturers to operate domestically. The United States is at a strategic disadvantage vis-à-vis many other industrialized nations that attract industry and jobs by taxing income from intellectual property sourced in those countries at a lower tax rate. This Article suggests that the United States should consider a patent box regime and outlines the benefits that such a regime should produce in terms of additional domestic manufacturing and job creation. The Article begins by discussing scholarly work that explores the link between domestic manufacturing and research and development, and explains why domestic manufacturing is critical to innovation. In turn, innovation leads to more productivity, higher paying jobs and lower unemployment. The next Section summarizes the significant features of the existing patent box tax regimes in certain European Union nations and China. Taking into account the positive attributes and deficiencies of the existing patent box regimes, the Article concludes by suggesting features that should be considered for inclusion in a U.S. patent box regime.

October 15, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Deadline Today: Call for Tax Papers and Panels for 2015 Law & Society Annual Meeting

SeattleToday is the deadline for Neil Buchanan's call for tax papers and panels for next year's annual meeting of the Law & Society Association in Seattle (May 28-31, 2015):

For the eleventh consecutive year, I will organize sessions for the the Law, Society, and Taxation group (Collaborative Research Network 31).

Although there is an official call for papers, please remember that you are not bound by the official theme of the conference.  I will give full consideration to proposals in any area of tax law, tax policy, distributive justice, interdisciplinary approaches to tax issues, and so on.

Continue reading

October 15, 2014 in Conferences, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

SSRN Tax Professor Rankings

SSRN LogoSSRN has updated its monthly rankings of 944 American and international law school faculties and 3,000 law professors by (among other things) the number of paper downloads from the SSRN database.  Here is the new list (through October 1, 2014) of the Top 25 U.S. Tax Professors in two of the SSRN categories: all-time downloads and recent downloads (within the past 12 months):

 

 

All-Time

 

Recent

1

Reuven Avi-Yonah (Mich.)

40,434

Reuven Avi-Yonah (Mich.)

6677

2

Paul Caron (Pepperdine)

26,751

Ed Kleinbard (USC)

5005

3

Louis Kaplow (Harvard)

23,022

Richard Ainsworth (BU)

2688

4

D. Dharmapala (Chicago)

20,615

D. Dharmapala (Chicago) 

2630

5

Vic Fleischer (San Diego)

20,156

Paul Caron (Pepperdine)

2624

6

James Hines (Michigan)

19,969

Robert Sitkoff (Harvard)

2051

7

Ted Seto (Loyola-L.A.)

19,266

Omri Marian (Florida)

1986

8

Richard Kaplan (Illinois)

19.122

Richard Kaplan (Illinois)

1901

9

Ed Kleinbard (USC)

16,472

Katie Pratt (Loyola-L.A.)

1824

10

Katie Pratt (Loyola-L.A.)

16,334

Bridget Crawford (Pace)

1626

11

Dennis Ventry (UC-Davis)

15,417

Jen Kowal (Loyola-L.A.)

1583

12

Carter Bishop (Suffolk)

15,230

Brad Borden (Brooklyn.)

1578

13

Jen Kowal (Loyola-L.A.)

14,568

David Gamage (UCBerkeley)

1509

14

David Weisbach (Chicago)

14,483

Jeff Kwall (Loyola-Chicago)

1502

15

Chris Sanchirico (Penn)

14,317

Louis Kaplow (Harvard)

1457

16

Richard Ainsworth (BU)

14,260

James Hines (Michigan)

1421

17

Robert Sitkoff (Harvard)

14,168

Francine Lipman (UNLV)

1390

18

Francine Lipman (UNLV)

14,009

Dan Shaviro (NYU)

1376

19

Brad Borden (Brooklyn)

13.974

Dick Harvey (Villanova)

1343

20

David Walker (Boston Univ.)

13,965

Vic Fleischer (San Diego)

1308

21

Bridget Crawford (Pace)

13,955

Ted Seto (Loyola-L.A.)

1292

22

Herwig Schlunk (Vanderbilt)

12,527

Carter Bishop (Suffolk)

1252

23

Dan Shaviro (NYU)

12,171

David Weisbach (Chicago)

1176

24

Ed McCaffery (USC)

11,771

Gregg Polsky (North Carolina)

1156

25

Wendy Gerzog (Baltimore)

11,759

Chris Sanchirico (Penn)

1151

Note that this ranking includes full-time tax professors with at least one tax paper on SSRN, and all papers (including non-tax papers) by these tax professors are included in the SSRN data.

Continue reading

October 15, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Prof Rankings | Permalink | Comments (0)

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Fleischer Presents Curb Your Enthusiasm for Pigouvian Taxes Today at Columbia

Fleischer Vic (2013)Victor Fleischer (San Diego) presents Curb Your Enthusiasm for Pigouvian Taxes at Columbia today as part of its Tax Policy Colloquium Series hosted by Alex RaskolnikovDavid Schizer, and Wojciech Kopczuk:

Pigouvian (or "corrective") taxes have been proposed or enacted on dozens of products and activities that may be harmful in excess: carbon, gasoline, fat, sugar, guns, cigarettes, alcohol, traffic, zoning, executive pay, and financial transactions, among others. Academics of all political stripes are mystified by the public’s inability to see the merits of using Pigouvian taxes more frequently to address serious social harms.

This enthusiasm for Pigouvian taxes should be tempered. A Pigouvian tax is easy to design — as a uniform excise tax — if one assumes that each individual causes the same amount of harm with each incremental increase in activity on the margin. This assumption of uniform marginal social cost pairs well with the limited information and enforcement capacity of tax institutions. But when marginal social cost varies significantly, a Pigouvian tax will not lead to an optimal allocation of economic resources. Focusing on carbon emissions, where the assumption of uniform marginal social cost happens to be reasonable, obscures this common design flaw.

Broadly speaking, Pigouvian taxes should be employed only when (1) the harm is (or is properly analogized to) global pollution, and where the harm does not vary based on the source, or (2) the variation in marginal social cost is easily observed and categorized, as with traffic congestion charges.

Continue reading

October 14, 2014 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Fleischer: Charitable Giving and Utilitarianism

Miranda Perry Fleischer (San Diego), Charitable Giving and Utilitarianism: Problems and Priorities, 89 Ind. L.J. 1484 (2014):

Charitable giving is redistributive at heart. It is thus surprising that scholarship on the charitable tax subsidies focuses on the efficient and pluralistic production of public goods while largely ignoring distributive justice concerns. Existing scholarship and current law leave crucial questions unanswered: How should we prioritize among charities? Should subsidized groups be required to help the poor? Are criticisms that charities do too little to help the poor valid? This Article is part of a series that examines how each common theory of distributive justice would answer these questions.

Continue reading

October 14, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Law Faculty Rankings Should Focus More on Non-Academic Influence

Patrick Arthur Woods, Stop Counting (Or At Least Count Better):

For American legal scholarship to fulfill its purpose, it must have an impact on the development of the actual law as it is enacted and interpreted in the United States. However, legal scholarship broadly — and law review articles in particular — has become less influential on judges and members of the practicing bar over time. This short essay argues that the decline is partly attributable to the open reliance on metrics that primarily represent influence within the legal academy when measuring the value of a scholar’s work. In particular, I argue that a focus on metrics with only a tenuous connection to non-academic usage of a new scholar’s work, such as download counts, law journal citation count-based rankings methodologies, and article placement, incentivizes new legal writers to write for other academics rather than for judges, attorneys in practice, or policy-makers.

October 14, 2014 in Law School Rankings, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (3)

Call for Papers: University of North Carolina Tax Symposium

North Carolina Tax SymposiumThe University of North Carolina Kenan-Flagler School of Business has issued a call for papers for its Eighteenth Annual Tax Symposium to be held April 10-11, 2015. The symposium "is designed to bring together leading tax scholars from economics, accounting, finance, law, political science, and related fields." The deadline for the call for papers is January 1, 2015:

Continue reading

October 14, 2014 in Conferences, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Thimmesch: The Tax Hangover -- Trailing Nexus

Tax Analysys Logo (2013)Adam B. Thimmesch (Nebraska), Evaluating the Tax Hangover: Trailing Nexus, 74 State Tax Notes 83 (Oct. 13, 2014):

In this article, which is adapted from a longer law review article [The Tax Hangover: Trailing Nexus, 33 Va. Tax Rev. 497 (2014)], Thimmesch examines the concept of trailing nexus. He argues that the concept is consistent with the physical presence standard and proposes an economic latency approach, which he asserts is consistent with both constitutional principles and economic reality.

October 14, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Analysts | Permalink | Comments (0)

Symposium on the Work of Larry Ribstein: Unlocking the Law

Ribstein 2Symposium, Unlocking the Law: Building on the Work of Professor Larry E. Ribstein, 38 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ. 1-173 (2014):

October 14, 2014 in Conferences, Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink | Comments (0)

Monday, October 13, 2014

Sanchirico Presents International Tax and Ownership Nationality Today at Florida

SanchiricoChris Sanchirico (Pennsylvania) presents As American as Apple, Inc.: International Tax and Ownership Nationality, 68 Tax L. Rev. ___ (2014), at Florida today as part of its Graduate Tax Program Colloquium Series:

The ownership nationality of large US multinational companies plays an implicit but important role in the current debate over how such companies should be taxed. This paper identifies that role and investigates what is actually known about where these companies’ shareholders reside.

October 13, 2014 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Mayer Presents Taxing Politics Today at Loyola-L.A.

MayerLloyd Hitoshi Mayer (Notre Dame) presents Taxing Politics at Loyola-L.A. today as part of its Tax Policy Colloquium Series:

This draft Article addresses two key questions relating to the interaction between federal tax law and political activity. First, is it advisable as a policy matter for Congress to use the tax law to regulate the flows of money in politics in furtherance of non-tax goals such as combatting corruption, promoting equality, and encouraging democratic participation? I answer this first question generally no, in significant part because the tax law and the IRS are poorly suited for this role and suffer significant collateral damage when their poor fit becomes evident, as the ongoing controversy over the IRS’ handling of exemption applications filed by Tea Party and other conservative groups reveals. Second, does tax law in its current form treat political activity properly based on longstanding tax policies relating to what constitutes income, what expenses should be deductible, what constitutes a taxable gift, and what characteristics organizations should have in order to qualify for tax exemption? I answer this second question generally yes, but identify several areas where the tax law needs to be changed to achieve greater consistency with such policies, including with respect to reducing the amount of political activity that is deemed permissible for most types of tax-exempt organizations.

Ellen Aprill (Loyola-L.A.) and Justin Levitt (Loyola-L.A.) are the commentators.

October 13, 2014 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Christians: It's Time to Fix FBAR

Tax Analysys Logo (2013)Allison Christians (McGill), Paperwork and Punishment: It's Time to Fix FBAR, 76 Tax Notes Int'l 147 (Oct. 13, 2014):

Allison Christians argues that the U.S. Foreign Bank Account Report regime is excessive and offers suggestions to narrow its scope and ease compliance burdens.

October 13, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Analysts | Permalink | Comments (0)

Sunday, October 12, 2014

Top 5 Tax Paper Downloads

SSRN LogoThere is a bit of movement in this week's list of the Top 5 Recent Tax Paper Downloads on SSRN, with a new paper debuting on the list at #5.  The #1 paper is now #19 in all-time downloads among 10,386 tax papers:

  1. [3288 Downloads]  'Competitiveness' Has Nothing to Do with it, by Edward D. Kleinbard (USC)
  2. [336 Downloads]  2013 Developments in Connecticut Estate and Probate Law, by Jeffrey A. Cooper (Quinnipiac) & John R. Ivimey (Reid and Riege, Hartford)
  3. [219 Downloads]  The OECD'S Flawed and Dated Approach to Computer Servers Creating Permanent Establishments, by Monica Gianni (Florida)
  4. [131 Downloads]  Rights Without Remedies, by Matthew L. M. Fletcher (Michigan State)
  5. [126 Downloads]  Home-Country Effects of Corporate Inversions, by Omri Y. Marian (Florida)

October 12, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax, Top 5 Downloads | Permalink | Comments (0)

Saturday, October 11, 2014

Ryan: Valuation Lessons From Estate of Adell

Tax Analysys Logo (2013)Kerry A. Ryan (St. Louis), Valuation Lessons From Estate of Adell, 144 Tax Notes 1455 (Sept. 22, 2014):

In Estate of Adell [T.C. Memo. 2014-155], the Tax Court determined that the correct value of a decedent’s interest in a closely held corporation was the figure reported on the original estate tax return. The court rejected alternative values as either using the incorrect valuation method or failing to account for the significant value of a key employee’s personal goodwill. 

October 11, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax, Tax Analysts | Permalink | Comments (0)

Friday, October 10, 2014

Brooklyn Hosts 2014 Scholar’s Roundtable Today

Brooklyn Logo 1Brooklyn hosts the 2014 Scholar’s Roundtable today with this tax panel:

October 10, 2014 in Conferences, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Weekly SSRN Tax Roundup

Weekly Student Tax Note Roundup

October 10, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax, Weekly Student Tax Note Roundup | Permalink | Comments (0)

Boston College and Tax Analysts Host Conference Today on Reforming Entity Taxation

BCTABoston College and Tax Analysts host a conference today on Reforming Entity Taxation at Boston College:

Keynote Speaker:  Lee Sheppard (Tax Analysts)

Panel #1: Reforming Entity Taxation: Corporations

  • Papers: Mirit Eyal-Cohen (Alabama), Deborah Schenk (NYU), Dan Shaviro (NYU)
  • Moderator:  Jeremy Scott (Tax Analysts)
  • Commentator:  Brian Galle (Boston College)

Panel #2:  Reforming Entity Taxation: Partnerships

  • Papers:  Karen Burke (Florida), Andrea Monroe (Temple), Gregg Polsky (UNC)
  • Moderator:  Amy Elliot (Tax Analysts)
  • Commentator:  James Repetti (Boston College)

Panel #3: Reforming Entity Taxation: International

  • Papers:  Allison Christians (McGill), Robert Peroni (Texas), Martin Sullivan (Tax Analysts)
  • Moderator:  Sam Young (Tax Analysts)
  • Commentator:  Diane Ring (Boston College)

October 10, 2014 in Conferences, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Thursday, October 9, 2014

Call for Tax Papers: Michigan Young Scholars’ Conference

The organizers of the 2015 Michigan Law School Young Scholars' Conference are seeking submissions for a tax panel:

MichiganThe University of Michigan Law School is pleased to invite submissions for its 2015 Young Scholars’ Conference to be held on March 27-28, 2015, at the University of Michigan Law School.

The conference is designated to provide aspiring doctoral students and recent graduates with a forum to present and discuss their work among academic peers from different nationalities and legal disciplines. The conference aims to promote fruitful research collaboration between its participants, and to encourage their integration in a community of legal scholars. ...

We welcome applications from current doctoral students, both in law and law-related disciplines, and from recent graduates of doctoral programs. The deadline for abstract submissions is December 2, 2014.

October 9, 2014 in Conferences, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Abreu & Greenstein: The Rule of Law as a Law of Standards -- Interpreting the Internal Revenue Code

Alice Abreu (Temple) & Richard K. Greenstein (Temple), The Rule of Law as a Law of Standards: Interpreting the Internal Revenue Code, 63 Duke L.J. Online ___ (2014):

Although fields of law ordinarily comprise both rules and standards, and foundational tax scholars such as Professors Surrey, Warren, and Bittker understood the importance of standards in tax law, many tax scholars and professionals have come to regard federal tax law as “the paradigmatic system of rules.” The vision of tax-as-rules is particularly alluring because rules have been associated with rule-of-law values, and it seems that the rule of law might be especially important in the field of taxation. The rule of law constrains the coercive power of government, and perhaps few powers are viewed with as much suspicion as the taxing power. Our claim that the existence of many rules in the tax law does not dictate the interpretation of all tax formulations as rules seems to threaten critical rule-of-law values. Nevertheless, we believe with Surrey and Warren that tax, like other areas of law, can flourish only if the IRS and the courts are able to respond to “unforeseen cases as they arise” and that this flexibility demands that many Code provisions be interpreted as standards. We also believe that this use of standards does not threaten rule-of-law values. In this essay we defend both propositions.

To do so we engage pointedly with Professor Larry Zelenak’s critique of the position we took in our earlier article, Defining Income [11 Fla Tax Rev. 295 (2011)], where we claimed that the category of “gross income” in the Internal Revenue Code is best understood as a standard, not a rule. In Custom and the Rule of Law in the Administration of the Income Tax, Professor Zelenak worried that our position threatened the rule of law by “stretch[ing] beyond the breaking point” the concept of interpretation [Custom and the Rule of Law in the Administration of the Income Tax, 62 Duke L.J. 855 (2012)].

Continue reading

October 9, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (1)

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

The Tax Lawyer Publishes New Issue

The Tax Lawyer (2013)The Tax Lawyer has published Vol. 67, No. 4 (Summer 2014):

October 8, 2014 in ABA Tax Section, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Smith: Changes in Agencies’ Interpretations of Their Own Regulations and Auer Deference

Patrick J. Smith (Ivins, Phillips & Barker, Washington, D.C.), Changes in Agencies’ Interpretations of Their Own Regulations and Auer Deference:

Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association, a case that is currently pending before the Supreme Court, involves the validity of a D.C. Circuit rule relating to the Administrative Procedure Act notice-and-comment requirements for rulemaking. Under the APA, substantive rules are subject to the notice and comment requirements but interpretative rules are not. Under this D.C. Circuit rule, if an agency has adopted an interpretation of one of its own substantive regulations in a guidance document that would not itself otherwise be a substantive rule, the agency must nevertheless use notice-and-comment procedures to change the interpretation. Although the D.C. Circuit has not done so, this rule can be justified based on the Auer deference principle under which agency interpretations of their own regulations are given deference similar to the deference that is given under Chevron to agency statutory interpretations. Under Auer, an agency interpretation of its own regulation can be viewed as having the force of law, and as a result should be viewed as itself a substantive rule, since a substantive rule is a rule with the force of law. As a substantive rule, notice-and-comment procedures are required.

October 8, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Schizer: The Influence of Tax on Managerial Agency Costs

David Schizer (Columbia), Tax and Corporate Governance: The Influence of Tax on Managerial Agency Costs:

OxfordThis chapter of the Oxford Handbook on Corporate Law and Governance canvasses a broad range of ways that tax influences managerial agency costs, focusing especially on the United States. In doing so, this chapter has two goals. The first is to help corporate law experts target managerial agency costs more effectively. The analysis here flags when tax is likely to exacerbate agency costs, and when it is likely to mitigate them. Armed with this information, corporate law experts have a better sense of how vigorous a contractual or corporate law response they need. In some cases, a change in the tax law may also be justified. This chapter’s second goal, then, is to enhance our understanding of tax rules, shedding light on a set of welfare effects that are important but understudied. After all, tax policy is more likely to enhance welfare if policymakers weigh all possible welfare effects, including managerial agency costs.

Overall, the U.S. tax system’s record in influencing agency costs is not encouraging. After all, a tax system’s priority is not to reduce agency costs, but to raise revenue efficiently and fairly. Government tax experts do not usually have the expertise or motivation to tackle corporate governance problems. Tax also is a poor fit because it typically applies mandatorily and uniformly, while responses to agency cost should be molded to the context. For example, promoting stock options or leverage will be valuable in some settings, but disastrous in others. There also are political hurdles to be overcome. Accordingly, when tax rules target agency costs, the results often are poorly tailored or even counterproductive.

Continue reading

October 8, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

ATPI Hosts Conference on Taxation and Migration

ATPI Logo (2015)The American Tax Policy Institute hosts a conference on Taxation and Migration organized by Reuven Avi-Yonah (Michigan) and Joel Slemrod (Michigan) in Washington, D.C. (Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, 1441 New York Avenue, N.W.) on October 17 (free registration here):

The conference assesses the effects of taxation on the migration across national and state boundaries of individuals at various stages of their lives. It will also evaluate whether corporate migrations (such as "inversions") involve migration of individuals, and what are the tax policy implications for the US and other jurisdictions. 

October 8, 2014 in Conferences, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Afield: Harnessing Taxpayer Choices to Improve Educational Quality

W. Edward Afield III (Ave Maria), Winning the Crowd: Harnessing Taxpayer Choices to Improve Educational Quality, 63 Cath. U. L. Rev. 297 (2014):

This article presents a novel approach to the debate over the best way to improve educational policy. Building off of research showing that decisions made by groups can be superior to those made by even the smartest members of those groups, this piece shows how this concept of a "wise crowd" can be applied to improve outcomes even in a complex policy debate like educational policy. Educational policy currently exhibits a host of competing ideas for the best mechanism to improve student outcomes. These competing ideas can be seen in the wide variety of schools that exist and that compete for resources to implement their approaches. Public schools, charter schools, magnet schools, International Baccalaureate programs, secular private schools, religious private schools, home schooling — all of these and more offer unique approaches to education. Even within these types of schools, different educational teaching philosophies abound. Although some schools unquestionably have better outcomes for students than others, there is not universal agreement about how to measure the quality of any particular school because of the host of factors involved in educating a student. In other words, some schools are likely better than others, but separating good schools from weak ones is difficult.

Continue reading

October 8, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Winchester: Obama's Gift to the Rich: A Permanent Payroll Tax Holiday

Richard Winchester (Thomas Jefferson),  Obama's Gift to the Rich: A Permanent Payroll Tax Holiday, 48 Val. U. L. Rev. 83 (2013):

President Obama made a concerted effort to enact tax legislation that benefited middle and lower income individuals over the rich. The temporary payroll tax cut in effect during 2011 and 2012 is a case in point. However, many high-income individuals enjoyed an even greater measure of payroll tax relief as a result of legislation that he signed. But instead of being granted directly under the terms of a bill, this relief was made possible because the tax legislation that he signed perpetuated what had been only a temporary incentive for individuals to avoid the payroll tax entirely when they work for a corporation that they also own or otherwise control. Simply put, these individuals can take a payroll tax holiday by substituting a dividend for any wages they could otherwise receive. What’s more, this tax dodge operates in a way that favors the rich far more than anyone else. This tax dodge would have died after Mr. Obama’s second year in office. However, the legislation he signed gave it perpetual life, reinforcing the need to address the multiple defects in the nation’s employment tax system.

October 8, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (1)

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Shackelford Presents The Taxation of Foreign Investors in U.S. REITs Today at Columbia

ShackelfordDouglas Schackelford (North Carolina) presents Taxes, Investors, and Managers: Exploring the Taxation of Foreign Investors in U.S. REITs (with Margot Howard (North Carolina) & Katherine Pancak (Connecticut)) at Columbia today as part of its Tax Policy Colloquium Series hosted by Alex RaskolnikovDavid Schizer, and Wojciech Kopczuk:

Exploiting a 2004 reduction in a unique capital gains withholding tax for foreign investors in U.S. REITs, this paper explores both the sensitivity of real estate investors to changes in their own taxes and the reaction of real estate managers to changes in their investors’ taxes. We find that both foreign investors and REIT managers responded to the tax change. This is consistent with taxes both restricting the flow of foreign capital into U.S. REITs and affecting the management of their real estate properties. To our knowledge, this is the first paper documenting that U.S. managers change their U.S. operations in response to the tax positions of foreign investors. This work should spur further study of the interplay between real estate and income taxes, the role of taxes on foreign portfolio investment, and the role of taxes on real managerial decisions. It also should aid policymakers who are considering further relaxing the discriminatory tax treatment for foreign investors in U.S. real estate.

October 7, 2014 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Gamage: On Double-Distortion Arguments, Distribution Policy, and the Optimal Choice of Tax Instruments

David Gamage (UC-Berkeley), On Double-Distortion Arguments, Distribution Policy, and the Optimal Choice of Tax Instruments:

There are both administrative and political constraints on the extent to which real-world tax systems might plausibly be reformed. No one seriously suggests that tax avoidance and evasion could be completely eliminated in real-world contexts. To better cope with tax avoidance and evasion, and to complement attempts to reform existing tax systems, this research project argues that governments should also raise revenues and promote distribution through a number of supplementary policy instruments. Among other applications, this research project argues that governments should probably: (a) levy both personal labor-income taxes and value-added consumption taxes, (b) tax both capital income and wealth, and (c) make use of a number of other tax and non-tax legal rules for distributive purposes.

Continue reading

October 7, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Yin: Reforming (and Saving) the IRS by Respecting the Public’s Right to Know

TaxSymposiumHeaderGeorge K. Yin (Virginia), Reforming (and Saving) the IRS by Respecting the Public’s Right to Know, 100 Va. L. Rev. 1115 (2014):

The current controversy involving possible political targeting by the IRS in administering the exempt organization (“EO”) tax laws is simply the latest in a long succession of similar allegations spanning at least five decades. This Article proposes to address the problem through increased transparency of the IRS’s administrative actions involving EOs. Greater transparency responds directly to the public’s frustration in not being able to monitor the agency and gain confidence that the laws are being applied in an even-handed manner.

Continue reading

October 7, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (1)

Monday, October 6, 2014

Norman Presents Corporate Tax and Beyond: Compliance Norms Today at McGill

Norman 2Wayne Norman (Duke University, Department of Philosophy) presents Corporate Tax and Beyond: Compliance Norms at McGill today as part of its Spiegel Sohmer Tax Policy Colloquium hosted by Allison Christians and Daniel Weinstock:

Using the media's recent coverage of Apple's tax avoidance strategies as a case study, Professor Norman will discuss how we ought to understand and rationalize corporate social responsibility and self-regulation norms emerging around the taxation of multinationals, and whether these rationalizations are, or should be, different than the rationalization of corporate tax regulation.

October 6, 2014 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Galle Presents The Price of Knowledge: Regulatory Design in an Uncertain World Today at Florida

GalleBrian Galle (Boston College) presents The Price of Knowledge: Regulatory Design in an Uncertain World at Florida today as part of its Graduate Tax Program Colloquium Series:

I examine a regulator’s choice of how and when to regulate when marginal costs and marginal social benefits of compliance vary across regulated parties and are costly to observe. Recent commentary suggests that heterogeneity of marginal cost favors “carrots” over “sticks.” Other commentary argues that heterogeneity of marginal social benefit may favor ex post over ex ante regulation, or may weigh in favor of “command and control” regulation rather than either sticks or carrots. While these recent papers add important nuance to the regulatory design literature, I argue here that their analysis overlooks several other critical factors that may alter their final policy recommendations. For example, I show that when marginal cost varies and moral hazard is possible, optimal government policy is a mix of stick and carrot, much as the optimal insurance contract provides for some co-payment by the insured. Ex post regulation does provide useful additional information when regulated parties are heterogeneous, but also carries significant and sometimes prohibitive social cost, especially when externalities are produced by limited-liability firms. Further, drawing on results from mathematical simulations, I show that the costs of heterogeneity can be sharply reduced even with a small degree of government flexibility. I apply these insights to a series of examples, including the pending U.S. cap-and-trade regulations, fat taxes, and the regulation of systemic risk in the banking sector.

October 6, 2014 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

McMahon Presents Reforming Taxation of Privately Held Businesses Today at Loyola-L.A.

McMahon (Marty)Martin J. McMahon Jr. (Florida) presents Reforming Taxation of Privately Held Businesses at Loyola-L.A. today as part of its Tax Policy Colloquium Series:

This article proposes the repeal of current Subchapters K and S, as well as the removal from the ambit of Subchapter C of all privately held corporations and the replacement of the current tax regime for privately held business with a new regime under which all privately held businesses (including wholly owned corporations and limited liability companies, and unorganized sole proprietorships) would be taxed at the entity level under a uniform rate schedule, regardless of the form of organization. (All publicly traded companies, and their controlled corporate subsidiaries, would continue to be governed by all of the structural rules of Subchapter C (and any other relevant Code sections outside of Subchapter C.))

Continue reading

October 6, 2014 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Wells: Pass-Through Entity Taxation -- A Tempest in the Tax Reform Teapot

Bret Wells (Houston), Pass-Through Entity Taxation: A Tempest in the Tax Reform Teapot, 14 Hous. Bus. & Tax L.J. 1 (2013):

Pass-through entities represent a major conceptual challenge for policy-makers today. But, pass-through entities did not occupy its dominant position with respect to growth-oriented small businesses prior to 1986, and the exponential growth in the importance of pass-through entity taxation since 1986 creates an impressive backdrop for the current business tax reform discussion. However, if tax reform proceeds along the path where corporate tax rates are significantly lower than individual tax rates, then small business taxpayers will be provided with a compelling economic incentive to exit pass-through entity structures in favor of C corporate entities. Tax reform that creates a monumental paradigm shift in the business planning premises of closely-held businesses will bring about transformative reactive tax planning on the part of the business community. Consequently, before enacting such a significant paradigm shift, Congress should clearly articulate the policy goals of this tax rate paradigm so that taxpayers will know which attempts to utilize C corporation vehicles as a mechanism to avoid the higher individual tax rate are acceptable and which such attempts cross the line. Where to draw the line is the historic challenge of the pre-1980 paradigm, but this reality has been shielded from our view due to the inverted rate structure that has existed since 1986.

October 6, 2014 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)