TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Trump's Cabinet Will Reap Hundreds Of Millions In Tax Savings Under I.R.C. § 1043 On Sales To Avoid Conflicts Of Interest

Trump (President Elect)Following up on my previous posts (links below): Wall Street Journal, Trump’s Nominees Stand to Reap Tens of Millions of Dollars in Potential Tax Deferrals:

President-elect Donald Trump’s top personnel picks stand to delay paying tens of millions of dollars in personal taxes on investment gains when they take up their posts, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of corporate filings and other financial disclosures.

The potential tax benefits are the result of a longstanding federal policy designed to let incoming appointees sell their shares and other assets, to avoid conflicts of interest in their new jobs, without racking up huge tax bills.

The tens of millions of dollars in possible tax deferrals are a conservative estimate; the actual benefit is likely much greater. That is because the Journal’s analysis only includes paper gains on shares of publicly traded companies, where the appointee has recently been an officer, director or major shareholder. A number of the candidates—including Commerce Secretary appointee Wilbur Ross and Mr. Trump’s Treasury pick, Steven Mnuchin—derive large portions of their wealth from closely held investment vehicles about which there is scant financial information in the public domain, but which they’d likely need to divest.

“It’s a great thing for the nominees,” says Robert Willens, a tax professor at Columbia Business School. “They get to diversify their portfolios on a tax-free basis.” He estimated that the total tax savings for the appointees likely will add up to hundreds of millions of dollars. ...

Continue reading

December 14, 2016 in Political News, Tax | Permalink | Comments (3)

What Law Prof Learned In Suing His Law School For Admissions Data

Arkansas Little RockFollowing up on my previous posts (links below): Robert Steinbuch (Arkansas-Little Rock), The Value of Data and Litigation:

I recently sued my law school (the UALR-Bowen School of Law) to get access to admissions and bar-passage data. I wasn’t planning on doing that, but it became necessary after the administration refused my Freedom of Information Act request about these matters. After I filed suit, the school gave me the data I wanted. When I examined that data, I discovered a set of uncomfortable facts that was difficult to reconcile with the narrative that my law school had presented.

Continue reading

December 14, 2016 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (7)

Oxfam:  The Dangerous Race To The Corporate Tax Bottom

OxfamOxfam, Tax Battles: The Dangerous Race to the Bottom on Corporate Tax (summary) (methodology):

Collecting tax is one of the key means by which governments are able to address poverty and inequality. But big business is dodging tax on an industrial scale, depriving governments across the globe of the money they need to address poverty and invest in healthcare, education and jobs. This report exposes the world’s worst corporate tax havens — extreme examples of a destructive race to the bottom on corporate tax which has seen governments across the globe slash corporate tax bills in an attempt to attract business. It calls on governments to work together to put a stop to this before it is too late.

Table 1

Continue reading

December 14, 2016 in Tax, Think Tank Reports | Permalink | Comments (7)

Mark Mazur To Replace Len Burman As Director Of Tax Policy Center

MazurWall Street Journal, Treasury Tax Policy Chief to Lead Tax Policy Center Think Tank:

The top tax policy expert at the U.S. Treasury Department will take over the Tax Policy Center, the nonprofit Washington think tank best known for its analyses of political and congressional tax proposals.

Mark Mazur, assistant secretary for tax policy, will become the center’s director on Feb. 1, the group announced today. The Tax Policy Center is a project of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution, and it operates a model that allows policymakers to see the impact of tax plans on different income groups.

Mr. Mazur, an economist, has had a long career in the government, including a stint as the Internal Revenue Service’s director of research, analysis and statistics. President Barack Obama nominated him to his current job, which he has held since 2012.

Tax Vox:  Mark Mazur to Take Over as TPC Director, by Leonard E. Burman:

Continue reading

December 14, 2016 in Tax, Think Tank Reports | Permalink | Comments (2)

Country-By-Country Tax Reporting And Global Inequality

Tax Justice NetworkTax Justice Network, Country-By-Country Reporting: How Restricted Access Exacerbates Global Inequalities in Taxing Rights:

Fully public country-by-country reporting would enable a dramatic shift in the accountability of both multinationals and tax jurisdictions. Estimates of the losses due to tax avoidance imply that lower-income countries would benefit disproportionately, as this transparency would offer powerful leverage against the current, highly unequal global distribution of taxing rights over multinationals. The OECD’s welcome adoption of the Tax Justice Network’s original proposal is, however, critically undermined by the decision to impose multiple limits on access to the data. This paper explores these limits, and demonstrates how the resulting unequal access is likely to exacerbate, rather than ameliorate that inequality in taxing rights.

Continue reading

December 14, 2016 in Tax, Think Tank Reports | Permalink | Comments (0)

Does The Prosecution Believe (And Can It Prove) That Wendi Adelson (And Not Charlie Or Donna) Hired Katherine Magbanua And Sigfredo Garcia To Kill Dan Markel?

AdelsonFollowing up on Sunday's post, Judge Denies Bond For Katherine Magbanua, Charged With First Degree Murder In Killing Of Dan Markel:  commenters to several websites claim that the prosecution at the bond hearing said in "closing arguments [that] 'Wendi Adelson' hired [Katherine Magbanua] and [Sigfredo Garcia] to commit the murder. No mention of Donna or Charlie [Adelson]. This was important because of all the speculation prior that Wendi was unaware and this murderous act was carried out on her behalf without her knowledge. The prosecution made a crystal clear point that Wendi ordered the hit."

Prior TaxProf Blog coverage:

Continue reading

December 14, 2016 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (8)

The IRS Scandal, Day 1315:  Bureaucratic Bumbling Or Targeting Of Conservatives?

IRS Logo 2Forbes: IRS Says Fixing Up Your Own House Is Not Charity, by Peter J. Reilly:

Got a run down old house that needs some spiffing up? Here is an idea. Get it designated an historic landmark. Then you can form a not-for-profit and get grants to do some renovations. Since it is an historic landmark, you'll have to let people see it sometimes. ...

[I]t did not end well for the organization (Let's call it This Really Old House (TROH))) that was the subject of Private Letter Ruling 201648020. ...

[T]he gatekeeper sorting the wheat from the chaff is the IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, sometimes referred to as EO. There are also state agencies of greater or less ferocity, usually the Attorney General rooting out phony charities, but mainly we seem to rely on IRS EO to prevent the charitable sector from being overrun by the less than charitable. The reliance was probably never that reasonable, but the developments over the last few years have made things much worse.

At its very heart the interminable IRS scandal, now on Day 1312 by TaxProf count was about exempt status applications.  Applications from Tea Party and similar organizations were held up and applicants were asked intrusive question.  Here is the thing. I am the last agnostic on the IRS scandal.  Was it bureaucratic bumbling or targeting of conservatives? I never found the targeting argument persuasive, but both Joe Kristan and George Will did, which gives me pause.

Regardless of whether it was bumbling or targeting, the end result has not been good for the integrity of the charitable sector. The IRS has streamlined the process and now many, possibly most applications are receiving no scrutiny thanks to the new Form 1023-EZ. You can find commentary to the effect that the corrupt IRS is still persecuting the Tea Party. I really think the only way out of the mess is to turn the vetting of exempt status over to a different agency. In the states supervision of not for profits generally falls under the Attorney General, not the revenue department. Maybe they are on to something.

The targeting believers will never accept that the IRS has been punished enough or that enough will be done to protect against future targeting, so taking the job away from the IRS might be the only way out of a downward spiral.

Continue reading

December 14, 2016 in IRS News, IRS Scandal, Tax | Permalink | Comments (3)

Tuesday, December 13, 2016

NY Times:  GOP Embraces Alan Auerbach's Destination-Based Corporate Tax, Paving Way For Fundamental Tax Reform

ABNew York Times: New Approach to Corporate Tax Law Has House G.O.P. Support, by Steve Lohr:

President-elect Donald J. Trump has vowed to protect and create American manufacturing jobs, even threatening high tariffs on imports to help achieve that goal. So far, though, his plan seems to lean heavily on one-at-a-time deals, like the one struck late last month to save jobs at the Carrier plant in Indianapolis.

But proponents of a more far-reaching approach say it could achieve many of Mr. Trump’s goals without tariff walls or presidential jawboning: a sweeping overhaul of the corporate tax system that embraces a concept endorsed by House Republican leaders in their blueprint for tax reform, announced in late June.

“It would be the biggest change in business tax law ever in the United States,” said Martin A. Sullivan, the chief economist at Tax Analysts, a nonprofit tax research organization and publisher. “It might actually work, and I don’t think it’s a partisan issue.”

A central idea is that goods would be taxed based on where they were consumed rather than where they were produced, meaning that imports would be taxed by Washington while exports would not. Tax experts call this a destination-based consumption tax.

This would be a sharp departure for the United States in a number of ways, but taxing imports but not exports is in step with nearly all of America’s trading partners, which have so-called value-added taxes. The import-and-export tax treatment is known as border adjustment.

The proposed overhaul would have other changes. The cost of capital investments would be deducted immediately rather than depreciated over years, but interest costs would no longer be deductible.

The package of ideas has evolved over years, mainly in academic circles. Its principal intellectual champion in the United States is Alan Auerbach, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley. Mr. Auerbach’s goal, he said, is to transform the economics of the corporate tax system so that “incentives will align with the national interest.”

Continue reading

December 13, 2016 in Tax | Permalink | Comments (3)

Former Tenured Prof Sues Atlanta's John Marshall Law School For Racial Discrimination

FulcherFollowing up on my previous posts (links below): National Law Journal, Another Racial Bias Suit Filed Against Atlanta's John Marshall Law School:

For the second time in four years, a female African-American former professor at Atlanta's John Marshall Law School has sued the institution for racial discrimination.

In a suit filed Dec. 8 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, plaintiff Patrice Fulcher claims she was continually denied promotions and pay raises by several of the school's deans during her eight years teaching there. She alleges that women, and African-American women in particular, are routinely relegated to teaching legal skills courses instead of doctrinal courses despite being qualified and are paid less than similarly situated white male professors.

Continue reading

December 13, 2016 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (0)

Corporate Welfare Won’t Create Jobs

Americans for Tax FairnessNew York Times op-ed: Corporate Welfare Won’t Create Jobs, by Frank Clemente (Executive Director, Americans for Tax Fairness):

The recent deal to keep some 800 workers employed at a Carrier plant in Indiana rather than see those jobs shipped to Mexico proved great news for the workers and a public relations bonanza for President-elect Donald J. Trump.

What it didn’t prove — even though the incoming president used the occasion to promote his proposal for a huge tax giveaway to corporations — is that cutting corporate taxes will save or create many American jobs. It won’t. ...

Continue reading

December 13, 2016 in Tax | Permalink | Comments (1)

July 2016 California Bar Exam Results:  Nine Law Schools (Including UC-Hastings) Are At Risk Of Failing ABA's Proposed New Bar Passage Accreditation Standard

California State BarThe California State Bar has released school by school data on the July 2016 California Bar Exam.  Here are the results for first time test takers for the 21 California ABA-approved law schools, along with each school's U.S. News ranking (California and overall):

Bar Pass

Rank (Rate)

 

School

US News Rank

CA (Overall)

1 (91%)

Stanford

1 (2)

2 (88%)

USC

4 (19)

3 (84%)

UC-Berkeley

2 (8)

4 (82%)

UCLA

3 (17)

5 (81%)

UC-Irvine

5 (28)

6 (72%)

UC-Davis

6 (30)

6 (72%)

Loyola-L.A.

8 (65)

8 (71%)

San Diego

10 (74)

9 (70%)

Pepperdine

8 (65)

10 (66%)

Santa Clara

11 (129)

62%

Statewide Ave. (CA ABA-Approved)

11 (61%)

McGeorge

13 (144)

11 (61%)

Cal-Western

Tier 2

13 (57%)

Chapman

12 (136)

14 (51%)

UC-Hastings

7 (50)

15 (42%)

Western State

Tier 2

16 (38%)

Southwestern

Tier 2

17 (36%)

San Francisco

Tier 2

18 (31%)

Golden Gate

Tier 2

18 (31%)

La Verne

Tier 2

18 (31%)

T. Jefferson

Tier 2

21 (22%)

Whittier

Tier 2

The Recorder, By the Numbers: How California Law Schools Fared on the Bar Exam:

Just five of 21 California law schools accredited by the American Bar Association had at least 75 percent of their graduates pass the July bar exam, a proposed new benchmark rate that in coming years could spell trouble for some institutions.

Continue reading

December 13, 2016 in Law School Rankings, Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (10)

The Dangers Of Echo Chambers On Campus: 'We Liberals Preach Inclusion Of People Who Don’t Look Like Us — So Long As They Think Like Us'

New York Times:  The Dangers of Echo Chambers on Campus, by Nicholas Kristof:

After Donald Trump’s election, some universities echoed with primal howls. Faculty members canceled classes for weeping, terrified students who asked: How could this possibly be happening?

I share apprehensions about President-elect Trump, but I also fear the reaction was evidence of how insular universities have become. When students inhabit liberal bubbles, they’re not learning much about their own country. To be fully educated, students should encounter not only Plato, but also Republicans.

We liberals are adept at pointing out the hypocrisies of Trump, but we should also address our own hypocrisy in terrain we govern, such as most universities: Too often, we embrace diversity of all kinds except for ideological. Repeated studies have found that about 10 percent of professors in the social sciences or the humanities are Republicans.

We champion tolerance, except for conservatives and evangelical Christians. We want to be inclusive of people who don’t look like us — so long as they think like us.

Continue reading

December 13, 2016 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (10)

NY Times:  State Ballot Access Laws Should Provide Antidote To Donald Trump’s Tax Secrecy

TrumpNew York Times editorial, An Antidote to Donald Trump’s Secrecy on Taxes:

President-elect Donald Trump refused to release his tax returns during the campaign and there is no sign that he will, ever. He broke longstanding tradition and set a terrible precedent for future presidential candidates.

Good government groups have been wringing their hands about what to do. Now comes an excellent idea from a New York State senator, Brad Hoylman, a Democrat from Manhattan, that would could force candidates to disclose their tax returns by making it a requirement for getting on the ballot.

Continue reading

December 13, 2016 in Tax | Permalink | Comments (1)

This Is Your Brain on Law School

BrainAbigail A. Patthoff (Chapman), This is Your Brain on Law School: The Impact of Fear-Based Narratives on Law Students, 2015 Utah L. Rev. 391:

Law students regularly top the charts as among the most dissatisfied, demoralized, and depressed of graduate student populations. As their teachers, law professors cannot ignore the palpable presence of this stress in our classrooms – unchecked, it stifles learning, encourages counterproductive behavior, and promotes illness. Yet, in the name of persuasion, professors frequently, and perhaps unwittingly, introduce additional fear into the classroom as a pedagogical tool via a common fear-based narrative: the cautionary tale. By taking lessons from existing social science research about “fear appeals” – scare tactics designed to frighten the listener into adopting a particular behavior – this article suggests that we can actively manage one source of law student anxiety by more thoughtfully using cautionary tales.

December 13, 2016 in Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink | Comments (3)

The IRS Scandal, Day 1314: How The Trump Administration Can Stop IRS Abuse of Political Groups

IRS Logo 2Jewish Press:  How the Trump Administration Can Stop IRS Abuse of Political Groups, by Jerome M. Marcus:

For more than six years, the Internal Revenue Service has been trying to fend off accusations that its process for granting tax-exempt status discriminated against applicants expressing political views at odds with those of the Obama administration. This discrimination against political viewpoints the Democrats disapprove of is a clear, even astonishing, violation of the First Amendment. For that reason, the IRS has lost many more of these battles than it has won. It’s lost battles not only in court against the victimized non-profits; it’s even lost against the Treasury Department’s own inspector general, which conducted a detailed study and concluded that many of the most serious accusations of discrimination were true.

In its court battles the IRS has been represented by the Justice Department, whose job it is to represent federal agencies when they are sued. No one will be shocked to learn that under the Obama administration, and Attorneys General Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch, DOJ lawyers have used every tool at their disposal to defeat the IRS’s accusers even when those accusers are agreeing with Treasury’s inspector general. That means that, according to the Obama administration’s own inspector general report, those victimized non-profits are right in claiming that they were discriminated against because of their political views.

That litigation strategy needs to change.

Upon President Trump’s inauguration, the Justice Department will get a new boss: Jeff Sessions, President Trump’s nominee for Attorney General. The moment he takes office, General Sessions should direct the Justice Department lawyers—all of whom report to him—to change their litigation stance to reflect an important adage about how government lawyers should do business: “the government wins when justice is done.”

It’s time to see that justice is done in these cases.

Up until now, the government’s strategy has been to make the IRS cases take as long as possible and to resist every demand for discovery—the process by which litigants can request that their adversaries produce documents, or provide testimony, revealing what was really going on inside the IRS.

I represent the plaintiff in one of these cases—Z STREET v. Koskinen—which challenges the IRS’s six year delay in processing the application for tax-exempt status by an organization whose views on the Middle East were at odds with President Obama’s. In discovery, we’ve asked for information about how the IRS went about deciding what to do with (and to) our organization. But the IRS has produced virtually nothing that sheds light on its decision-making process. Other organizations in court against the IRS have been given the same treatment by the Justice Department’s litigation teams.

All of the members of those government lawyer teams report to the U.S. Attorney General. That means that when the new sheriff arrives in town he can give new orders on how these cases ought to be handled.

Attorney General Sessions should direct these lawyers to stop resisting discovery, and to stop trying to prevent the litigants—and the public—from finding out what the IRS was really doing to all of these organizations for all these years. This is not a matter of political payback, like the question whether Hillary Clinton ought to be prosecuted for what many think are her misdeeds, at the State Department and with the Clinton Foundation. It’s just a matter of letting the truth be told. Z STREET, like many of the plaintiffs in the other cases against the IRS, is not seeking money damages. We just want to know the truth about what the IRS was doing to us, and why, and at whose direction.

Continue reading

December 13, 2016 in IRS News, IRS Scandal, Tax | Permalink | Comments (1)

Monday, December 12, 2016

NY Times:  The ‘H-Bomb’ Fizzles—The Harvard Brand Takes A Hit

Harvard (2016)New York Times, The ‘H-Bomb’ Fizzles: The Harvard Brand Takes a Hit:

There exists a species of person — typically a well-groomed overachiever — who, when asked where he or she went to college, rather than state its name directly, will provide a Russian nesting doll set of geographical responses.

In New England. Massachusetts. Well, Boston. Um … Cambridge.

Finally, sotto voce, with an apologetic wince or sheepish smile, anticipating the word’s being volleyed back in an affected Boston Brahmin accent: Harvard.

For decades, circumspect students and alumni of the nation’s oldest university have played “this unbearable little game,” said William Deresiewicz, author of Excellent Sheep: The Miseducation of the American Elite & the Way to a Meaningful Life. “They’re coy, because they don’t want to destroy our egos, but they can’t wait for the moment they drop the ‘H-bomb.’” ...

Continue reading

December 12, 2016 | Permalink | Comments (19)

WSJ:  Estate Planning Strategies For The Trump Administration

Trump (President Elect)Wall Street Journal Tax Report: Strategies for Playing Trump’s New Estate-Tax Plans, by Laura Saunders:

The American estate tax turned 100 this year. It probably won’t live to see 101.

Both President-elect Donald Trump and Republicans in the House of Representatives have issued proposals to end the tax, and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R., Utah) has opposed it as well. Launched in 1916, the tax was first imposed to help finance World War I and more recently was meant to limit concentrations of wealth.

“Estate-tax repeal seems virtually certain,” says Michael Graetz, an estate-tax expert who was a Treasury official during the administration of George H.W. Bush and now teaches at Columbia University’s law school.

Under current law, about 0.2% of Americans who die in 2017, or about 5,200 people, are expected to have taxable estates, according to the Tax Policy Center in Washington. This small sliver is far below the high-water mark of 7.7% in 1976, when the estate-tax exemption was $60,000.

WSJ

Continue reading

December 12, 2016 in Tax | Permalink | Comments (5)

University Of Wisconsin Gives Administrators Final Say Over Five-Year Post-Tenure Reviews; Underperforming Faculty Will Be Placed In Remediation Program, Leading To Termination If Performance Does Not Improve

WisconsinChronicle of Higher Education, Wisconsin Regents Approve Post-Tenure Policies Condemned by Faculty:

University of Wisconsin system regents on Thursday approved a new policy mandating that administrators conduct “independent, substantive reviews” of tenured faculty members every five years, The Journal Sentinel reports. While top administrators already have authority over post-tenure reviews, faculty critics have worried aloud that the change — which makes administrators’ duties in the area explicit — will make it easier for professors to be fired.

Wisconsin State Journal, Changes to UW Faculty Reviews Give Administrators Final Say on Performance:

Continue reading

December 12, 2016 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (5)

More On The Proposed Estate Tax Valuation Discount Regulations

Sloshed Santas Enjoy Tax Deduction For Participating In NYC Pub Crawl: 'Bringing Arts Events To Underserved Communities'

SantaConNew York Post, SantaCon Protesters and Revelers Clash During Bar Crawl:

SantaCon’s drunken Kris Kringles found coal in their stockings Saturday morning in the form of neighborhood activists jeering the annual Manhattan bar crawl.

Two protesters were ticketed — for using megaphones without a permit — at about 11 a.m. as about 1,000 Santas gathered around the Flatiron Building to begin their boozy trek through Gramercy, East Village and Midtown.

“I saw a sex act in Aisle Four of Duane Reade!” one yelled as Santas showered him with boos. “You guys are doing a bad thing, and it makes everyone sad.” ...

Continue reading

December 12, 2016 in Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

ABA's Proposed 75% Bar Passage Requirement Ignores Key Problem: Failure To Tie Student Loans To Job Outcomes

American Lawyer LogoThe American Lawyer:  The ABA Raises the Wrong Bar, by Steven J. Harper (Adjunct Professor, Northwestern; author, The Lawyer Bubble):

[I]n October, ...  the ABA's Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar recommended a rule change that it thought was monumental. It's actually far too little coming far too late. The new rule would require at least 75 percent of a law school's graduates to pass a state bar exam within two years of receiving their degrees. The current standard requires a 75 percent pass rate within five years. Since 2000, only four law schools have faced difficulty under the current standard, and all were restored to full accreditation.

Plummeting national bar passage rates coupled with growing student debt for degrees of dubious value are the culmination of a dysfunctional market in legal education. That dysfunction is taking a cruel toll on a generation vulnerable to exploitation by elders who know better. Sooner or later, we'll all pay the price.

Continue reading

December 12, 2016 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (26)

The IRS Scandal, Day 1313: The Koskinen-Trump Connection

IRS Logo 2Politico Morning Tax, Now That's Going Way Back:

Trump and Koskinen might decide that it’s best for the IRS chief to move along — but apparently they’ll do so after more than four decades worth of history. A New York Times article from May 1975 discusses the efforts of the president-elect, then a 28-year-old developer, to buy a hotel. The assets management company representing the bankrupt company that owned the hotel was represented by a 35-year-old executive — yup, John Koskinen.

Continue reading

December 12, 2016 in IRS News, IRS Scandal, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

TaxProf Blog Weekend Roundup

Sunday, December 11, 2016

Death Of Hope Lewis (Northeastern), Age 54

Hope LewisNortheastern Mourns Loss of Hope Lewis, Law Professor and Human Rights Scholar:

Pro­fessor Hope Lewis, a member of the School of Law’s fac­ulty since 1992, died Tuesday after a long ill­ness. She was 54.

Born on May 14, 1962, Lewis was a grad­uate of the Bronx High School of Sci­ence, Har­vard Col­lege, and Har­vard Law School. A pas­sionate cham­pion of the poor and dis­ad­van­taged, Lewis focused her teaching and schol­arly work on human rights and eco­nomic rights in the global economy. She co-​​founded the law school’s Pro­gram on Human Rights and the Global Economy and served as the fac­ulty director of the law school’s Global Legal Studies program.

Continue reading

December 11, 2016 in Legal Education, Obituaries | Permalink | Comments (0)

The Top 5 Tax Paper Downloads

SSRN LogoThis week's list of the Top 5 Recent Tax Paper Downloads is the same as last week's list:

  1. [652 Downloads]  Aggressive Tax Planning & the Ethical Tax Lawyer, by Heather M. Field (UC-Hastings)
  2. [339 Downloads]  The Up-C Revolution, by Gregg D. Polsky (Georgia) & Adam H. Rosenzweig (Washington University)
  3. [302 Downloads]  Estate Planning for Digital Assets: Assigning Tax Basis and Value to Digital Assets, by Elizabeth Ruth Carter (LSU)
  4. [280 Downloads]  IRS Issues Final and Temporary Debt-Equity Regulations Under Section 385, by David S. Miller (Proskauer, New York) & Janicelynn Asamoto Park (Proskauer, New York)
  5. [185 Downloads]  Were Trump's Fake Losses Legal as Tax Deductions?, by Calvin H. Johnson (Texas)

December 11, 2016 in Scholarship, Tax, Top 5 Downloads | Permalink | Comments (0)

A Special Christmas Dinner

Yet another reason why I love Pepperdine:  last night, my wife and I were delighted to host a Christmas dinner in our home for two Muslim families. We were one of about a dozen Pepperdine families participating in an effort organized by a Pepperdine professor to build bridges of respect, understanding, and friendship between Muslims and Christians. In June, Muslim families hosted Pepperdine families for Iftar dinners during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

Photo 1

December 11, 2016 | Permalink | Comments (3)

Judge Denies Bond For Katherine Magbanua, Charged With First Degree Murder In Killing Of Dan Markel

MagnaubaTallahassee Democrat, Judge Denies Bond For Katherine Magbanua, One of Three Charged With FSU Law Professor Dan Markel's Murder:

Katherine Magbanua will remain in jail, for now.

At a day-long Friday bond hearing, prosecutors fought to keep the 31-year-old mother of two, believed to a key orchestrator in the shooting of Florida State law professor Dan Markel, in jail until her Feb. 27 trial.

Leon Circuit Judge James Hankinson sided with them, denying Magbanua’s motion for pretrial release.

The third person charged in Markel’s death, Magbanua sat quietly, whispering with her Miami attorneys, Christopher DeCoste and Tara Kawass, while her brother Erik Magbanua, who testified Friday, sat in the courtroom. ...

A mountain of evidence in the murder case was presented at the hearing.

Continue reading

December 11, 2016 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (10)

The IRS Scandal, Day 1312: Impeachment Averted, But Will Koskinen Resign Or Be Fired By President Trump?

IRS Logo 2Politico Morning Tax, Impeachment Averted:

There’s not a ton of bipartisanship in the House these days, but lawmakers apparently made an exception for quashing a Freedom Caucus effort to impeach IRS Commissioner John Koskinen.

In the end, only 72 House Republicans voted to essentially bring the impeachment resolution to the floor. ... But while almost 350 House members decided to refer the resolution to a Judiciary Committee that hasn’t been gung ho on impeachment so far, that shouldn’t necessarily be viewed as an endorsement of Koskinen — who avoids becoming the first executive branch official since Reconstruction to be impeached. Top Republicans like House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady made it clear they were no fans of Koskinen’s work, but that using time for impeachment proceedings might be unnecessary because they don’t expect the IRS chief to stay on under President-elect Donald Trump. (Koskinen's term ends next November, no matter what.)

 

Continue reading

December 11, 2016 in IRS News, IRS Scandal, Tax | Permalink | Comments (5)

Saturday, December 10, 2016

This Week's Ten Most Popular TaxProf Blog Posts

Hamilton By Harvard Economics Students

Continuing my obsession with interest in Hamilton (links below):

(Click on Vimeo button on bottom right to view video directly on Vimeo to avoid interruption caused by blog's refresh rate.)

Continue reading

December 10, 2016 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (0)

The Tax Implications Of Trump’s Disposal Of His Businesses

Trump (President Elect)Following up on Wednesday's post, Could President Trump Sell His Businesses, Tax-Free?: Bloomberg Law, Tax Implications of Trump’s Business Decisions: A Primer:

Donald Trump must confront major tax issues when deciding what to do with his real estate empire and other businesses in order to avoid conflicts of interest as he assumes the presidency.

What will happen if he decides to divest his businesses or simply pass them outright to his children?

Continue reading

December 10, 2016 in Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Fall 2017 Law School Applicants Down 5.1%

LSACLSAC, Three-Year ABA Volume Comparison:

As of 12/02/16, there are 81,710 applications submitted by 14,892 applicants for the 2017–2018 academic year. Applicants are down 5.1% and applications are down 1.7% from 2016–2017. Last year at this time, we had 28% of the preliminary final applicant count.

ABA

Continue reading

December 10, 2016 in Law School Rankings, Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (2)

The IRS Scandal, Day 1311:  The IRS 'Scandal' Was Part Of GOP's Strategy To Bog Down Obama Administration

IRS Logo 2Salon, Tom Cotton and Trey Gowdy Vow Vigilance Over the Trump Administration — No, Seriously, Stop Laughing:

Considering how the Republican Party has fallen in line behind Donald Trump over the last few months, does anyone seriously think that this will ever amount to anything? The Chicago Tribune recently reported on Thursday:

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C. . . . agreed that House and Senate committees must keep close tabs on Donald Trump’s new government starting next year — not because they want to stick it to a man that neither originally endorsed for president, but because doing so would help rebalance power between the three branches of government.

Sure thing. And I’ve got a bridge over the Potomac to sell you. ...

[A]fter the partisanship of the last eight years, why would anyone give Gowdy or Cotton the benefit of the doubt? Gowdy can complain all he wants about the deeply unfair perception, as he put it in remarks on Tuesday to a room full of Cotton’s fundraisers, that any subpoenas sent to Hillary Clinton or contempt-of-Congress votes held on former IRS bureaucrat Lois Lerner were “politicized.” But that perception existed because the investigations that Congress conducted into the Benghazi tragedy and the IRS “scandal” were in fact part of the GOP strategy to bog down the Obama administration and harm Clinton’s presidential ambitions.

Continue reading

December 10, 2016 in IRS News, IRS Scandal, Tax | Permalink | Comments (6)

Friday, December 9, 2016

Weekly Tax Highlight And Roundup

This week, Joe Kristan (CPA & Shareholder, Roth & Company (Des Moines, Iowa); Editor, Tax Update Blog) discusses the estate tax advantages of cash basis farming.

KristanDeath takes all, but leaves the deductions.

Cash-basis accounting and the rule that adjusts the basis of inherited assets to their date-of-death value confounded the IRS in Tax Court yesterday.

Most businesses that produce things have to capitalize their input costs into the costs of their inventory. They wait to get the benefit of the costs on their tax returns as part of the cost of goods sold when they sell the inventory.

Farmers get a better deal. Assuming they are non-corporate farmers who are active in the business, they get to deduct their input costs when paid. This “cash basis” accounting allows farmers to buy seed, feed, and fertilizer at in December to reduce their taxable income, even when they don’t plan to use it until they plant next year’s crop or feed next year’s livestock. The tax planning opportunities are obvious, and jealously guarded by farm state congressmen.

Continue reading

December 9, 2016 in Tax, Weekly Tax Roundup | Permalink | Comments (0)

Weekly SSRN Tax Article Review And Roundup

This week, Daniel Hemel (Chicago) reviews a new paper by Edward D. Kleinbard (USC), The Right Tax at the Right Time.

HemelEdward Kleinbard’s newest paper lays out the case for a “Dual Business Enterprise Income Tax,” or “Dual BEIT,” as an alternative to the existing patchwork of federal taxes on business income. Readers familiar with Kleinbard’s past work know that he is a powerful analyst and a crystal-clear writer, and this paper is no exception. For reasons I explain below, I am not sure that a Dual BEIT is the “right tax” for our time, but all can agree that Kleinbard’s proposal is an important contribution to the business tax policy debate.

In a prior paper, Kleinbard explained why he thinks the United States should tax capital income annually at a flat rate; the latest installment explains why he thinks a Dual BEIT is the best way to achieve that result. In brief, a Dual BEIT would consist of a flat-rate entity-level tax on profits and a flat-rate investor-level tax on “normal returns.”

Continue reading

December 9, 2016 in Scholarship, Tax, Weekly SSRN Roundup | Permalink | Comments (0)

Weekly Legal Education Roundup

Tax Policy In The Trump Administration

The 10 Most Underrated Law Schools In America

American Lawyer LogoFollowing up on last week's post, Law School Rankings By Job Placement:  American Lawyer, 10 Most Underrated Law Schools in America:

I've culled the data (I only considered schools ranked No. 50 or worse on U.S. News & World Report) to come up with the 10 most underrated law schools in the land:

AmLaw

Continue reading

December 9, 2016 | Permalink | Comments (3)

TEDx Talk:  Tax Policy, Climate Change, And Innovation

(Click on YouTube button on bottom right to view video directly on YouTube to avoid interruption caused by blog's refresh rate.)

Continue reading

December 9, 2016 in Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Death Of Michael Rich (Elon), Age 41

RichFollowing up on my April 26 post, Michael Rich (Elon) On His Metastatic Kidney Cancer Diagnosis: Elon Law School Press Release, Death of Associate Professor Michael L. Rich:

One of Elon University School of Law’s most prolific teacher-scholar-mentors, beloved by students and colleagues alike, passed away Wednesday morning after a three-year battle with metastatic kidney cancer.

A memorial service will be held next week at St. Andrew’s Episcopal Church (2105 W. Market Street) in Greensboro. This announcement will be updated with more information once details are finalized.

"Let it suffice that Mike’s dedication, even against insurmountable odds, to Elon Law, his students, his work, and his colleagues should inspire and sustain us all,” said Elon Law Dean Luke Bierman. “We are better for knowing Mike but his passing leaves a profound void in our hearts and our community.”

Continue reading

December 9, 2016 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (2)

The IRS Scandal, Day 1310:  Rep. Jim Jordan Is 'Frustrated' By House Passing On IRS Chief Koskinen's Impeachment

IRS Logo 2Newsmax, Rep. Jim Jordan 'Frustrated' by House Passing on IRS Chief Koskinen's Impeachment:

Rep. Jim Jordan said Thursday he is frustrated that the House passed on his bid to impeach IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, but pointed out the American public is also frustrated by Washington's actions.

'[They] voted a month ago, drain the swamp, clean the place up and hold people accountable, people like John Koskinen," the Ohio Republican told Fox News' "America's Newsroom" program.

The IRS, said Jordan, targeted people for their political beliefs with its increased targeting of conservative-based groups, and "you can't have that happen in a great country like ours. You cannot say, 'because you're a conservative we'll come after you.'"

On Tuesday, House members voted by a 342-72 margin to send Jordan's request to the House Judiciary Committee, which has not indicated it wants to prosecute the case. ...

Jordan and fellow Ohio Rep. Warren Davidson both voted against referring the matter to committee. Jordan and his fellow members of the House Freedom Caucus say Koskinen should lose his job for allowing evidence concerning former IRS official Lois Lerner to be destroyed, and for lying to Congress.

"We were told on Election Day to come here and clean this place up," Jordan said Thursday. "We had a chance to do it other day, but unfortunately we didn't get the votes."

Continue reading

December 9, 2016 in IRS News, IRS Scandal, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Thursday, December 8, 2016

The American Dream Is Collapsing For Young Adults

Washington Post, American Dream Collapsing For Young Adults, Study Says, As Odds Plunge That Children Will Earn More Than Their Parents:

Rising income inequality has eroded the ability for American children to grow up to earn more than their parents, according to a new study from a team of researchers that could carry deep implications for President-elect Donald Trump's policy agenda.

The research from a group led by Stanford's Raj Chetty, and also including economists and sociologists from Harvard and the University of California at Berkeley, estimates that only half the children born in the 1980s grew up to earn more than their parents did, after adjusting for inflation. That's a drop from 92 percent of children born in 1940.

Chetty

Continue reading

December 8, 2016 in Tax | Permalink | Comments (8)

Graduate Sues University For $1.2 Million, Says 'Appallingly Bad' Teaching Prevented Him From Being A Successful Lawyer

Oxford (2016)American Lawyer, Graduate Sues Oxford University For Preventing Him From Becoming A Lawyer:

An Oxford graduate is suing the prestigious university for 1 million pounds ($1.27 million), claiming that its “appallingly bad” teaching prevented him from having a successful career as a lawyer.

Faiz Siddiqui, who graduated with a degree in modern history 16 years ago, told the high court he believes he would have had a career as an international commercial lawyer if he had been awarded a first-class degree, rather than the upper second-class he actually achieved. (Instead of using a GPA system, U.K. degrees are graded in four categories: first class, upper second class, lower second class and third class.)

Siddiqui, who trained as a solicitor after leaving university, claims that he underachieved due to “negligent” teaching.

Continue reading

December 8, 2016 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (7)

Why Blue States Are the Real ‘Tea Party’

New York Times op-ed: Why Blue States Are the Real ‘Tea Party’, by Steven Johnson:

ImperfectWhen the modern Tea Party movement coalesced in the early days of the Obama presidency, its allusion to the political grievances of the protesters in Boston Harbor a couple of hundred years earlier seemed plausible enough: Its members felt that their taxes were too high and their interests not adequately represented by the remote authorities in Washington.

But the election of 2016 presents a challenge to that historical lineage. The home states to the Tea Party are actually doing great on the taxation and representation front. It’s the progressive blue states that should be protesting. ...

For complicated reasons — some of which have to do with rural poverty, some of which have to do with the basic physics of supporting infrastructure in low-density regions — a disproportionate amount of per capita federal spending and benefits now flow down to the low-density states. According to a study by the Tax Foundation conducted several years ago, for every dollar New Jersey pays in federal taxes, it receives 61 cents in benefits and other federal spending. For the same dollar of taxes Wyoming spends, it gets $1.11 back.

Put those two trends together and you have a grievance worthy of the original Tea Party: more taxation with less representation. The urban states are subsidizing the rural states, and yet somehow in return, the rural states get more power at the voting booth.

You can represent the injustice of this arrangement mathematically. Think of it as two different kinds of return on investment: how much does each state receive for every dollar it pays in taxes, and how much Electoral College influence does each state get for each vote cast. Take the average of those two data points and you have a measure of which states are getting shortchanged by the system. Call it the disenfranchisement index.

Continue reading

December 8, 2016 in Tax | Permalink | Comments (11)

Anderson On The California Bar Exam Carnage: Law Schools Need To 'Cull The Herd Of Bloated Tenured Faculties'

TenureFollowing up on yesterday's post, Who Is To Blame For UC-Hastings 'Horrific' 51% Bar Pass Rate?: Robert Anderson (Pepperdine), The California Bar Exam Saga Continues:

The State Bar of California recently announced that the pass rate for the July 2016 California bar exam was 43%. This is a multi-decade low, and has affected virtually every law school in California. Even among ABA-accredited law schools' first time takers, the passage rate was only 62%. Particularly hard hit was UC Hastings, which apparently had a 51% passage rate.

Hastings Dean David Faigman reportedly took to email and wrote a letter to the UC Hastings Community in which he laid the blame on the State Bar. He expressed "incredulity" at the "shameful" and "unconscionable" conduct of the Bar. ... 

The primary reason that bar passage rates are declining is not because of the conduct of the State Bar, but because of the conduct of law schools. Law schools are admitting less and less qualified students in an effort to bolster their bottom lines. And why do their bottom lines need to be bolstered? Because they have too many faculty relative to student demand for the schools, and are either reluctant or unable to reduce the size of the faculty to "right size" the law school relative to present demand for the JD.

The blame for the current crisis lies squarely on the bloated tenured faculties of American law schools. In every institution, ineffective faculty members continue to collect a paycheck for decades after their "sell by" date has come and gone. Many faculty members at many institutions should have never been hired to teach law in the first place. But the instinctive response of most affinity groups is to circle the wagons when danger appears, and that is exactly what has happened in law schools.

Continue reading

December 8, 2016 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (22)

Piketty, Saez & Zucman:  Economic Growth in the United States — A Tale of Two Countries

Thomas Piketty (Paris School of Economics), Emmanuel Saez (UC-Berkeley) & Gabriel Zucman (UC-Berkeley), Economic Growth in the United States: A Tale of Two Countries (more here; PowerPoint slides here):

In a recent paper, the three authors of this issue brief attempt to create inequality statistics for the United States that overcome the limitations of existing data by creating distributional national accounts. We combine tax, survey, and national accounts data to build a new series on the distribution of national income. National income is the broadest measure of income published in the national accounts and is conceptually close to gross domestic product, the broadest measure of economic growth. Our distributional national accounts enable us to provide decompositions of growth by income groups consistent with macroeconomic growth.

In our paper, we calculate the distribution of both pre-tax and post-tax income. The post-tax series deducts all taxes and then adds back all transfers and public spending so that both pre-tax and post-tax incomes add up to national income. This allows us to provide the first comprehensive view of how government redistribution in the United States affects inequality. Our benchmark series use the adult individual as the unit of observation and split income equally among spouses in married couples. But we also produce series where each spouse is assigned their own labor income, allowing us to study gender inequality and its impact on overall income inequality. In this short summary, we would like to highlight three striking findings.

Our first finding—a surge in income inequality

Figure 2

Our second finding—policies to ameliorate income inequality fall woefully short

Continue reading

December 8, 2016 in Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Chicago Tribune:  Valparaiso Law School Faces Two Bleak Choices — 'Admit More Unprepared Students Or Face Reality And Close'

Valpo (2019)Following up on my previous posts (links below): Chicago Tribune, Valparaiso University's Law School Might Face Bleak Choices:

Two weeks ago in a nearly unprecedented backhand, the American Bar Association punished two law schools 723 miles apart for similar indiscretions. One was put on probation for two years. The other was censured. ... The ABA said both schools were not doing any of their central jobs well enough during the assessment period to guarantee continued accreditation. Fix it, or else.

Continue reading

December 8, 2016 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (4)

Maryland Law School Offers 10% Tuition Discount To Federal Employees Pursuing MSL, LLM Degrees

Maryland (2016)Press Release, Office of Personnel Management, Maryland Carey Law form Federal Employee Education Alliance:

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law announced an agreement to offer a Federal Employee (FEDEM) grant equivalent to a 10% tuition discount to Federal employees and their spouses admitted to the Master of Science in Law (MSL) or the Master of Laws (LL.M.) programs.

Continue reading

December 8, 2016 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (4)

The IRS Scandal, Day 1309:  How Trump Got Yanked Into GOP's IRS Impeachment Fight

IRS Logo 2Politico, How Trump Got Yanked Into GOP's IRS Impeachment Fight:

John Koskinen's ouster was voted down after multiple conversations among Reince Priebus, the Freedom Caucus and House leaders.

House Freedom Caucus members were gearing up for a floor fight Tuesday to impeach IRS Commissioner John Koskinen when one of the group’s leaders, Rep. Jim Jordan, received an unexpected phone call from Reince Priebus.

Priebus, the new chief of staff for President-elect Donald Trump, asked Jordan (R-Ohio) to hold off on the effort to remove Koskinen, sources close to the matter said. The impeachment drive had been a long-running source of tension between Republican leaders who feared it was an abuse use of congressional oversight, and conservatives who believed Koskinen lied to them and deserved to be punished.

In the frenzied hours as the impeachment showdown neared, multiple conversations ensued between Priebus and Freedom Caucus leaders. There are conflicting accounts of where the outgoing Republican Party chairman came down.

GOP leaders say Priebus remained opposed to Koskinen's impeachment. Freedom Caucus sources counter that Priebus called them back several times to retract any such opposition and say Trump's inner circle would remain neutral. ...

Freedom Caucus sources say the back-and-forth over Koskinen shows that party leaders will use Trump and his inner circle as a lever against them. They fear that after years of bucking Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and their top lieutenants, GOP leaders will point to a Trump-run White House to justify their positions and try to steamroll the group as it tries to push the party’s agenda to the right. ...

According to multiple sources, Ryan staffers contacted Priebus and urged him to weigh in on the Koskinen dispute. Ryan and other top House Republicans said they were worried that impeaching Koskinen would trigger a Senate trial for the IRS commissioner in early 2017 that could eat up weeks of Senate floor time, potentially impeding Trump's early agenda. Plus, most of the House Republican Conference had no interest in voting on this sensitive matter, which many felt pitted them between their base and their conscience. ...

A source familiar with their conversations said Priebus called back later Tuesday to clarify that Trump's team was not against impeachment and would remain neutral. “It’s ludicrous to suggest a president who ran on draining the swamp would oppose the impeachment of an IRS commissioner who targeted some of the very same people who voted for him,” said a Freedom Caucus member.

Continue reading

December 8, 2016 in IRS News, IRS Scandal, Tax | Permalink | Comments (6)

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

Grinberg Presents Issues To Consider In The EU State Aid Investigations Today At Pennsylvania

GrinbergItai Grinberg (Georgetown) presents Issues to Consider in the EU State Aid Investigations at Pennsylvania today as part of its Tax Policy Workshop Series hosted by Chris Sanchirico and Reed Shuldiner:

  • Washington Will Not Let Brussels Have the Last Word on Apple, Financial Times op-ed, Sept. 1, 2016
  • EU State Aid Investigations Demand an Aggressive Response, 83 Tax Notes Int'l 611 (Aug. 15, 2016) (Abstract: This article is the first in a multi-part series addressing the concerns raised by the European Commission’s state aid investigations. In this installment, the authors provide background on the state aid investigations and describe the ways in which these investigations represent a sharp departure from past commission practice. Subsequent pieces will respectively address the tax, investment law, and trade law concerns raised by the commission’s investigations.)

Continue reading

December 7, 2016 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)