TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron, Dean
Pepperdine University School of Law

Thursday, February 8, 2018

Speck Presents Debt And Taxes Over The Life Cycle Today At UCLA

Speck (2017)Sloan Speck (Colorado) presents Debt and Taxes over the Life Cycle at UCLA today as part of its Tax Policy and Public Finance Colloquium Series hosted by Jason Oh and Kirk Stark:

The deductibility of non-business interest under the United States income tax has bedeviled policymakers and commentators since the early twentieth century. Debates have centered around definitional and normative questions about the tax base—whether non-business interest should be deductible under a normative income tax, or whether non-business interest should be taken into account as part of a consumption tax base. Essentially, this literature asks how interest deductibility fits, or should fit, within the broader tax system.

This paper argues for a different approach. In the United States, the tax aspects of non-business debt are situated within a broader matrix of regulations governing various categories of household debt. Certain types of household debt—this paper considers home mortgage loans and loans for higher education—are structured in ways that have implications, explicit and tacit, across borrowers’ life cycles. This context should inform normative determinations about the value of interest deductibility for household debt.

Continue reading

February 8, 2018 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Higher Education Is Headed For A Supply And Demand Crisis

DDWashington Post, Higher Education Is Headed For a Supply and Demand Crisis:

Already, we’re beginning to see the impact of demographic changes in higher education. A survey released last week by the Chronicle of Higher Education found that 52 percent of private colleges and 44 percent of public colleges didn’t meet their enrollment goals this past fall.

“We’re an expensive product,” Kathryn Coffman, vice president and dean of admissions and financial aid at Franklin College in Indiana, told the Chronicle. “Now more than ever, outcomes are critical, and people want to know that the investment they’re making is going to result in something.” ...

The raw numbers are sobering. But then a new book landed on my desk a few weeks ago that put the figures in a new, and disturbing, light. In Demographics and the Demand for Higher Education [(Johns Hopkins University Press 2017)], Nathan D. Grawe, an economics professor at Carleton College, in Minnesota, explores the overall decline in high school graduates in greater detail.

Continue reading

February 8, 2018 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (2)

We Should Tax The Clintons And Other Former Senior Government Employees At A Higher Rate

Limor Riza (Ono Academic College), Should We Tax the 'Clintons' and Other Former Senior Civil Servants More? Yes, We Should, 18  U.C. Davis Bus. L.J. ___ (2018):

This paper debates whether former civil servants should be taxed differentially. It argues that whenever public officials’ post-retirement income in the private sector is derived from their previous office, an additional tax should be levied on them, since in such situations the ability-to-pay principle is an insufficient horizontal equity criterion. This idea is grounded in equity propositions and may be justified by various liberal theories of equal opportunities and utilitarianism.

Continue reading

February 8, 2018 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (1)

Marian Reviews Tax Evasion And Inequality

Jotwell (2016)Omri Marian (UC-Irvine), What We Now Know We Didn't Know About Tax Evasion (And Why It Matters) (JOTWELL) (reviewing Annette Alstadsæter, Niels Johannesen & Gabriel Zucman, Tax Evasion and Inequality (NBER Working Paper No. 23772 (2017)):

Over the past several years, a series of leaks related to offshore tax avoidance and evasion (SwissLeaksLuxLeaksthe Panama PapersBahama Leaks, and Paradise Papers, to name a few) has fueled calls for tax transparency. To date, most discussion of the leaks has been policy-oriented (leaks: good or bad?) and largely anecdotal (based on some truly outrageous revelations). It was not until very recently, however, that a small group of researches started delving into the data exposed by these leaks to make statistically significant empirical findings. AlstadsæterJohannesen & Zucman’s (AJZ) paper is an excellent example of such paper, which combines methodological sophistication, public data, and leaked data, to make important new contributions to the voluminous literature on the offshore tax world. ...

Continue reading

February 8, 2018 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Northwestern Offers 6-8 Graduate Tax Program Tuition Scholarships ($64k) To Serve As Student Editors Of The Tax Lawyer

Northwestern Tax LawyerFollowing up on last week's post, After 50 Years, ABA Tax Section Shifts Publication Of The Tax Lawyer From Georgetown To Northwestern:  Philip Postlewaite (Director, Northwestern's Graduate Tax Program):

Along with Karen Hawkins, the current Chair of the ABA Tax Section, I am proud to announce that The Tax Lawyer, the flagship journal of the ABA’s Tax Section, will be moving to Northwestern in the fall of 2018. We look forward to the beginning of a close and engaging relationship with the Editorial Board and the Council of the ABA Tax Section. David Cameron will become the Faculty Editor, supervising student and faculty involvement in the publication process.

In order to assist in the publication of The Tax Lawyer, Northwestern will select a six-to-eight member Student Editorial Board from among the admitted students in each of our future LLM classes. In order to encourage highly-qualified applicants to apply to, and matriculate at, Northwestern and to serve as student editors, we have created The Northwestern Pritzker Dean’s Scholarship Fund. Importantly, Dean’s Scholars will receive scholarships equal to the cost of tuition [$63,558] at Northwestern.

Continue reading

February 8, 2018 in ABA Tax Section, Legal Education, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Insuring Your Charitable Donation: An Experiment

Renate Buijze (Erasmus University Rotterdam), Christoph Engel (Max Planck ) & Sigrid Hemels (Erasmus University Rotterdam), Insuring Your Donation: An Experiment, 14 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 858 (2017):

There is a rich experimental literature on the determinants of consumers’ generosity (summarized by a meta study one of us has published, (Engel 2011)). This literature shows, inter alia, that donations are the higher the more the recipient is deserving help; the higher the bigger the effect on the recipient; the lower the more pronounced the uncertainty. To the best of our knowledge we are the first to study – with the help of a lab experiment using a real charity, a real risk, and a real insurer – whether consumers are willing to pay for insuring them against the risk that the donation misses its intended goal, or that the donation is not rewarded by a refund. We find a pronounced willingness to pay for either insurance. But the availability of insurance only increases the frequency of donations if the risk affects the recipient’s deservingness.

Continue reading

February 8, 2018 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

What Makes The 1st Year Of Law School Crazier? Playing Division l Basketball

Following up on my previous post, Missouri, Pepperdine 1Ls Play Division I Basketball:  Law.com, What Makes the 1st Year of Law School Crazier? Playing Division l Basketball:

Three first-year law students from schools across the country [Missouri, Pepperdine, William & Mary] are playing big-time college basketball this year. Their schedules are not for the faint of heart. ...

Hempy

What reaction did you get from classmates when they first heard you are also playing basketball? ...
[Kevin Hempy (Pepperdine)]:  I think some people didn’t really know it was allowed or possible. One of the best parts of the year for me has been getting to know the people in my classes. I’ve had buddies come down to the games and cheer us on. Overall, people have been supportive and encouraging.

Why did you decide to go to law school? ...
Hempy:  Pepperdine allows undergraduates to get a certificate in conflict management through the Strauss Institute for Dispute Resolution, which is part of the law school. You take classes in negotiation, mediation, and some elective classes. That is really where my interest in law school came from. I took four classes at the law school as an undergrad. I really enjoyed that program. ...

Continue reading

February 8, 2018 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (0)

Wednesday, February 7, 2018

Brooks Presents Legal Interpretation Of Canadian Tax Law Today At Toronto

Brooks (Kim)Kim Brooks (Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University) presents Legal Interpretation of Tax Law: Canada at Toronto today as part of its James Hausman Tax Law and Policy Workshop Series:

This chapter is designed to lay the ground for comparative study into legal interpretation in tax law. To that end, its goal is primarily descriptive. It is designed to address the kinds of factors that might support a comparative analysis of Canada’s approach to legal interpretation. Presumably, similarities and differences among countries might be identified and explained based on a set of factors, including the structure of government, the design of adjudication mechanisms (both administrative and judicial), the dominant philosophies of language, the historic practices of interpretation, the importance of legislative purpose and the extent to which external aids are relied upon, and the overarching norms of grammar and their interaction with legislative drafting.

Continue reading

February 7, 2018 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

How Much Do Professors Work?

Chronicle of Higher Education, How Much Do Professors Work? One Researcher Is Trying to Find Out:

How many hours should professors work each week? Everyone has a different answer, especially professors.

Case in point: When Nicholas A. Christakis, a professor at Yale University, asserted on Twitter that graduate students should work more than 60 hours each week, a debate ensued. Professors pointed to studies that suggested not everyone can devote more than 40 hours each week to their jobs — for example, if they have kids — or that the institutions and departments they work for may have different standards of work, research, and competitiveness. 

Christakis drew his point from a study [The Long, Lonely Job of Homo academicus: Focusing the Research Lens on the Professor's Own Schedule] at Boise State University that found that faculty participants reported working, on average, 61 hours per week. They self-reported working 10 hours per day Monday to Friday and about that much on Saturday and Sunday combined, with a significant portion of their days spent dealing with email and attending faculty meetings.

Profs

Continue reading

February 7, 2018 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (2)

Hickman & Kerska: Restoring The Lost Anti-Injunction Act

Kristin E. Hickman (Minnesota) & Gerald Kerska (J.D. 2017, Minnesota), Restoring the Lost Anti-Injunction Act, 103 Va. L. Rev. 1683 (2017):

Should Treasury regulations and IRS guidance documents be eligible for pre-enforcement judicial review? The D.C. Circuit’s 2015 decision in Florida Bankers Association v. Treasury puts its interpretation of the Anti-Injunction Act at odds with both general administrative law norms in favor of pre-enforcement review of final agency action and also the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the nearly identical Tax Injunction Act. A 2017 federal district court decision in Chamber of Commerce v. Internal Revenue Service, appealable to the Fifth Circuit, interprets the Anti-Injunction Act differently and could lead to a circuit split regarding pre-enforcement judicial review of Treasury regulations and IRS guidance documents.

Continue reading

February 7, 2018 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Christine Beshar, Cravath's First Woman Partner, Dies At 88

BesharWall Street Journal, Accidental Lawyer, Carved a Trail for Women:

Christine Beshar made her mark as a partner in the male-dominated world of Wall Street law firms.

After graduating from Smith College in 1953, she had no career plan but was determined to work. Since her husband, Robert Beshar, was a lawyer, she applied to law firms. One hired her as a switchboard operator. Another made her assistant librarian. Then she spent several years assisting her husband, who represented Sperry & Hutchinson, the issuer of green stamps that rewarded loyalty at grocery stores.

While working and having babies, Ms. Beshar gained practical legal experience and read books on contracts, rules of evidence and constitutional law. Without attending law school, she took the New York bar exam and passed on her first try. Cravath, Swaine & Moore hired her in 1964 and seven years later made her its first woman partner. She was so surprised and delighted by the news that she gave the presiding partner, Roswell Gilpatric, a hug.

Continue reading

February 7, 2018 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (0)

Pepperdine Law Grad Chuck Rettig To Be Named IRS Commissioner

RettigCharles Rettig (J.D. 1981, Pepperdine; Tax LL.M. 1982, NYU), tax partner at Salkin, Rettig, Toscher & Perez (Beverly Hills, CA), is slated to be President Trump's nominee to be IRS Commissioner.  Wall Street Journal, Trump Soon to Nominate Tax Lawyer Charles Rettig to Run IRS:

President Donald Trump will nominate Charles Rettig, a California tax lawyer, to run the Internal Revenue Service, a person familiar with the matter said Monday.

If confirmed by the Senate, Mr. Rettig will take one of the most thankless jobs in Washington. He would run an agency that despite a shrunken budget is responsible for implementing the sprawling Republican overhaul of the U.S. tax system passed by Congress last year. He would also be charged with overseeing the agency Mr. Trump has said has been auditing his tax returns from 2002 onward. The president has cited that process as the reason he hasn’t released those documents to the public.

Mr. Rettig’s selection departs from the recent trend of IRS commissioners. The most recent Senate-confirmed commissioners—John Koskinen, Douglas Shulman, Mark Everson and Charles Rossotti —weren’t career tax experts when they were picked.

Continue reading

February 7, 2018 in Legal Education, Tax | Permalink | Comments (1)

Shanghai Law Students Seek To Oust Former Case Western Dean, Say #MeToo Movement Should Apply In China

Mitchell 2Following up on my previous posts (links below):  Cleveland Scene, Disgraced Former CWRU Law Dean Lawrence Mitchell is Now a Professor in Shanghai:

In 2014, Case Western Reserve University Law School Dean Lawrence Mitchell resigned amidst a lawsuit alleging rampant sexual impropriety and retaliation against a professor who tried to blow the whistle.

The salacious details of that suit — including Mitchell's repeated attempts to enlist students and underlings in threesomes — and the complicity of CWRU administrators, including President Barbara Snyder, were chronicled in this 2014 Scene feature story. The suit was settled two months after publication. ...

He is now a professor of Law at the Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (SHUFE) in China, and students have lately learned of his past (un)professional conduct. ... One student suggested in an email that China should not be excluded from the #MeToo movement and cited two recent cases in Chinese higher education where professors had been removed due to accusations of sexual harassment. Some SHUFE students are now trying to raise awareness about Mitchell.

Continue reading

February 7, 2018 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (5)

Leiter: Using 'Hidden' Faculty Hiring Criteria As Decisive Factor Raises Ethical And Legal Questions

ChronicleChronicle of Higher Education op-ed:  Academic Ethics: ‘Hidden’ Hiring Criteria, by Brian Leiter (Chicago):

Any seasoned academic who has been involved with job searches knows there are two sets of criteria for some positions: the ones in the published ad and the "hidden" ones.

"The dean says we must hire a woman this time," reports the chair. Or the dean says: "The department’s lack of racial diversity is becoming a problem, you’ve got to fix that with this year’s search." Or the department’s star faculty member tells the chair, "If you don’t hire my spouse into a permanent line finally, we will take jobs elsewhere next year." All of those fall into the hidden-criteria column.

The published job ads connected to such searches reveal nothing of the underlying reality. For legal reasons, no job ad can say, "Only women should apply," or "This job is open only to spouses of very famous members of our department."

Of course, every job search may involve considerations that are not part of the position’s public advertisement. Unbeknownst to applicants, the search committee may be stacked in favor of quantitative candidates in international politics, rather than theorists; or in favor of corporate-law experts, rather than public-law scholars. Even more commonly, members of the search committee take seriously only applicants from certain programs, or with certain recommenders — even though the ad says nothing about either.

So why should we be concerned about the hidden criteria in some searches but not in others?

Continue reading

February 7, 2018 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (7)

The IRS Scandal, Day 1735: The End Of IRS Targeting?

IRS Logo 2Wall Street Journal, The End of IRS Targeting?:

It can be hard to keep track of Obama-era targeting of the political opposition by federal administrative agencies. But this week brings fresh hope that such abuses will not be repeated.

The Journal reports:
President Donald Trump will nominate Charles Rettig, a California tax lawyer, to run the Internal Revenue Service, a person familiar with the matter said Monday.
If confirmed by the Senate, Mr. Rettig will take one of the most thankless jobs in Washington.

Of course in recent years it has been thankless for especially good reason. During the Obama administration, the tax agency targeted conservative organizations for exceptional scrutiny and even harassment. Last year the IRS settled lawsuits brought by organizations that had been mistreated simply because they advocated for limited Constitutional government. The government shelled out millions of dollars to settle one suit involving 428 organizations, according to an October report in the New York Times. In a separate case brought by different organizations, an apology for the IRS’s egregious conduct was enough to resolve the litigation.

Reported the Times:
The settlements were the conclusion of two legal battles that have dogged the I.R.S. since the initial lawsuits were filed after a 2013 treasury inspector general’s audit that found groups with “Tea Party” or “Patriot” in their names received more scrutiny over their applications for tax-exempt status. The revelations plunged the I.R.S. into a firestorm that ultimately led to the ouster of its acting commissioner and prompted accusations that the agency was being used as a political weapon by the Obama administration.

While Mr. Obama did force the resignation of the acting IRS commissioner in the wake of the scandal in 2013, he made no serious effort to reform the agency and proclaimed that the targeting had involved “not even a smidgen of corruption” long before his government had finished investigating.

Mr. Obama also placed John Koskinen atop the agency. Mr. Koskinen’s failures to comply with subpoenas and to report accurately to the Congress inspired an effort to impeach him in 2015. A Journal editorial at the time noted:
In February 2014 Congress instructed Mr. Koskinen to supply all emails related to Lois Lerner, who ran the IRS Exempt Organizations division during the targeting. We now know Mr. Koskinen made little or no effort to preserve or track these communications and that, only a few weeks after the subpoena, IRS employees in West Virginia erased 422 backup tapes, destroying up to 24,000 Lerner emails.

So the bar has been set very low. Can the new IRS chief clear it? ...

A man who has spent a career across the table from the IRS, sometimes clashing with the agency in court, would seem to possess some useful experience. Here’s hoping he chooses to be a reformer.

Continue reading

February 7, 2018 in IRS News, IRS Scandal, Tax | Permalink | Comments (1)

Tuesday, February 6, 2018

Koester Presents Corporate Subsidies And Political Connections: State-level Evidence Today At Georgetown 

KoesterAllison Koester (Georgetown) presents Corporate Subsidies and Political Connections: State-level Evidence (with Daniel Aobdia (Northwestern) & Reining Petacchi (Georgetown)) at Georgetown today as part of its Tax Law and Public Finance Workshop Series hosted by Lilian Faulhaber and Itai Grinberg:

This paper examine s whether corporate political connections are associated with government awarded subsidies, and how this relation impacts subsidy effectiveness in spurring future economic growth beyond the firm. Subsidies relate to foregone government revenues through tax credits/abatements and to government resource transfers through grants and cost reimbursement programs. Using novel datasets to identify state-awarded corporate subsidies and corporate contributions to state political candidates, we find robust evidence that political contributions increase both the likelihood a company is awarded a state subsidy and the dollar value of subsidy awarded.

Continue reading

February 6, 2018 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Auten Presents Income Inequality In The United States Today At NYU

NYU Law (2016)Gerald Auten (U.S. Treasury Department) presents Income Inequality in the United States: Using Tax Data to Measure Long-Term Trends (with David Splinter (Joint Committee on Taxation)) at NYU today as part of its Tax Policy Colloquium Series hosted by Lily Batchelder and Daniel Shaviro:

Previous studies using U.S. tax return data, such as Piketty and Saez (2003), concluded that top one percent income shares increased substantially since 1960. But tax return based measures are biased by tax base changes and missing income sources. Accounting for these limitations reduces the increase in top one percent income shares by two-thirds. Further, accounting for government transfers reduces the increase over 80 percent. After-tax income results are similar.

This shows that unadjusted tax return based measures present a distorted view of inequality because incomes reported on tax returns are sensitive to tax law changes and omit significant income sources

February 6, 2018 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

The New Tax Law Summarized In One Interactive Page

Tax lawyers at the Texas law firm Jackson Walker (including 2016 Pepperdine graduate Brady Cox) have produced a fantastic 233-page PowerPoint presentation, 2018 Tax Reform: What You Need to Know Now.  The presentation summarizes the entire TCJA in a single interactive page that allows users to click on relevant portions and go to the detailed slides on that topic:

JW

February 6, 2018 in Tax, Tax Policy in the Trump Administration | Permalink | Comments (0)

Pepperdine Law School: The Next Chapter

Pepperdine Law School just realeased the inaugural edition of a new publication, The Brief:

The Brief

February 6, 2018 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (2)

Aprill & Hemel: The Tax Legislative Process — A Byrd's Eye View

Ellen Aprill (Loyola-L.A.) & Daniel Hemel (Chicago), The Tax Legislative Process: A Byrd's Eye View, 81 Law & Contemp. Probs. ___ (2018):

The Byrd rule, a once-obscure Senate procedural provision, captured the spotlight in December 2017 when it briefly derailed an effort by congressional Republicans to enact the most sweeping tax overhaul in a generation. And while the Byrd rule did not prevent the ultimate passage of the new tax law, it profoundly influenced both the substance and the form of the final legislation. The immediate aftermath of the 2017 tax overhaul thus provides an opportune moment to take stock of the Byrd rule’s role in the making of federal tax law. This essay—part of a symposium issue of Law and Contemporary Problems on “The Past, Present, and Future of the Tax Legislative Process”—considers the myriad ways in which the Byrd rule has influenced federal tax law and policy in the three dozen years since the rule’s emergence.

Continue reading

February 6, 2018 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

The Scholar's Motivation

Chad M. Oldfather (Marquette), The Scholar's Dilemma, 101 Marq. L. Rev. ___ (2018):

This essay pursues questions relating to scholarly motivation. What motivates the production of scholarship, and what ought to motivate it? Is it appropriate for a scholar to seek a reputation for its own sake, or for the associated invitations, recognitions, and lateral offers a reputation might produce? Or should the scholar be more like the (stereotypical) artist, seeking to pursue her conception of truth regardless of whether the world rewards her vision?

Continue reading

February 6, 2018 in Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink | Comments (1)

Request For Proposals: 2019-20 ACTEC Symposium

ACTECRequest for Proposals: ACTEC Foundation 2019-20 Academic Symposium:

The Legal Education Committee of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC) requests proposals for a $20,000 grant to host an academic symposium on trust and estate law during the 2019-2020 academic year. ...

The RFP should provide the following information. A. Theme. The theme of the symposium should be related to trust and estate law, defined to include any topic related to the gratuitous transfer of property (e.g., probate law, trust law, elder law, transfer tax law). A broad theme permits a wide range of papers and is more likely to be successful. Past themes have included Trust Law in the 21st Century (Cardozo 2005); Inheritance Law in the 21st Century (UCLA 2008); Philanthropy Law in the 21st Century (Chicago-Kent 2009); The Uniform Probate Code: Remaking of American Succession Law (Michigan 2011); The Role of Federal Law in Private Wealth Transfer (Vanderbilt 2014); and The Centennial of the Estate Tax: Perspectives and Recommendations (Boston College 2015). The theme of the most recent symposium, which took place at the University of Iowa College of Law in September 2017, was Wealth Transfer Law in Comparative and International Perspective (articles will be published in the Iowa Law Review). ...

Continue reading

February 6, 2018 in Conferences, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

The Extraordinary Rise And Sudden Decline Of Law School Tuition: Veblen Effects In Higher Education

VeblenPaul F. Campos (Colorado), The Extraordinary Rise and Sudden Decline of Law School Tuition: A Case Study of Veblen Effects in Higher Education, 48 Seton Hall L. Rev. 167 (2017):

This Article attempts to give a partial answer to the question of why, over a period of several decades, American law schools were able to continually raise tuition far faster than the rate of inflation. My thesis is that from at least the middle of the 1950s until the early years of the present decade, law school tuition often displayed the characteristics of a Veblen good, a good for which demand increases as price increases. I then argue that over the past few years, what I call the “law school reform movement” has made it increasingly difficult for law schools to market their credentials as Veblen goods. As a result, after more than half a century of constant increases, real law school tuition has suddenly fallen significantly.

Continue reading

February 6, 2018 in Legal Education, Scholarship | Permalink | Comments (1)

Monday, February 5, 2018

Mason Presents Why State Aid Needs Discrimination Today At BYU

Mason (2016)Ruth Mason (Virginia) presents Why State Aid Needs Discrimination at BYU today as part of its Tax Policy Colloquium Series hosted by Cliff Fleming and Gladriel Shobe:

In August 2016, the European Union’s (EU) Commission dropped a bombshell: it would require Ireland to collect more than $14.5 billion in back taxes from Apple under anti-subsidy rules that most American tax lawyers had never even heard of—the state-aid rules. Suspicions that certain EU Member States colluded with large multinationals to help them evade other states taxes suggests the need for a supra-national authority that could curb harmful state tax practices.

Continue reading

February 5, 2018 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Kleinbard Delivers Lecture On Fiscal Policy In An Age Of Inequality Today At Georgia

Kleinbard (2015)Edward D. Kleinbard (USC) delivers the 115th Sibley Lecture at Georgia today on What’s a Government Good For?: Fiscal Policy in an Age of Inequality:

The debate surrounding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act demonstrated the intellectual bankruptcy of U.S. fiscal policy debate. The TCJA has serious flaws as a matter of narrow tax policy, but it is more fundamentally flawed when viewed through the proper policy lens, which is overall fiscal policy – the net of government taxing and spending. The TCJA greatly exacerbates already untenable budget deficits. Its tax prescriptions are even more regressive when the spending cuts contemplated by the legislation itself are reflected. And the law’s regressivity is compounded further when plausible financing paths for these large deficits are included in the analysis. In particular, the “dynamic” growth analysis whose tax ramifications were part of the debate leading up to the law was predicated on enormous cuts to future transfer payments, and confused GDP growth with enhanced welfare.

Continue reading

February 5, 2018 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Leigh Osofsky Leaves Miami For North Carolina

Osofsky (2016)Tax Law Expert Leigh Osofsky Joins UNC School of Law Faculty:

UNC School of Law is pleased to welcome Leigh Osofsky as a tax law professor. Osofsky joins the Carolina Law faculty from the University of Miami School of Law, where she has taught courses addressing various aspects of taxation and policy for the last seven years. Before joining the University of Miami faculty, Osofsky was an acting assistant professor of tax law at New York University from 2009 to 2011.

“We are thrilled to have Leigh join our faculty this summer,” says Kathleen DeLaney Thomas, assistant professor of law and director of the UNC School of Law Tax Institute. “Leigh is a well-respected and accomplished tax scholar, as well as a committed and effective teacher. We’re also excited that she will help us expand our tax law course offerings at the law school and will be a great resource for our students.”

Leigh's recent publications include:

Continue reading

February 5, 2018 in Legal Education, Tax, Tax Prof Moves | Permalink | Comments (0)

Addressing Loafing On Faculty Committees

Andrea Anne Curcio (Georgia State) & Mary A. Lynch (Albany), Addressing Social Loafing on Faculty Committees, 67 J. Legal Educ. 242 (2017):

Scholarly productivity reaps tangible internal and external rewards, while the "reward" for excellent faculty committee work performance often is additional committee work. Some faculty members perform substantial institution-sustaining committee work while others are institutional service work “social loafers”. This essay suggests this traditional workload distribution model may be unsustainable.

Continue reading

February 5, 2018 | Permalink | Comments (1)

Lesson From The Tax Court: Forms Follow Function In Return Filing

Montana Road SignLaw is often a mixture of form and function.  Formalist rules help create order and certainty but sometimes do so at the expense of justice and meaning.  Discerning and following the function or purpose of the law may create juster outcomes but sometimes does so at the expense of certainty.  All can agree that there is a time and a place for each mode of analysis, but the devil is in the details. 

The speed limit sign to the right illustrates the difference.  It's a sign you might have encountered driving through Montana up until 1999 when the Montana Supreme Court ruled that the "reasonable & prudent" rule was unconstitutionally vague.  It gives two rules for drivers:  a bright-line night rule that you may not drive faster than 65 mph and a fuzzy day rule that gives no set speed limit but just says you may not drive unreasonably or imprudently. 

In applying the speed limit sign, formalists and functionalist might disagree on when the night rule applies. A formalist might look to the dictionary definition of night as the period between sunset and sunrise and so apply the night rule at the minute after sunset. But a functionalist might say that the purpose of the night rule is to set a limit when night-time conditions make it presumptively unsafe to drive faster. So a functionalist might not apply the night rule until later after sunset, and might also apply it during the “day” when a weather event, such as a haboob or an eclipse, creates sufficiently night-like conditions. Of course, formalist thinkers might disagree among themselves if they use different dictionary definitions of “night."  Likewise, functionalist thinkers might disagree among themselves if they have different ideas about the purpose of the night rule.

Last week’s reviewed opinion Melissa Coffey Hulett a.k.a. Melissa Coffey, et al v. Commissioner, 150 T.C. No. 4 (January 20th, 2018) is a case where the Tax Court takes a largely functional approach to IRC §6501(a) statute of limitations on assessment and yet the functionalists on the Court disagree with each other about the proper outcome.  Section 6501(a) says that the IRS has a period of three years “after the return was filed” to assess “any tax imposed by this title.” The opinion for the Court, authored by Judge Holmes, is a mix of formalism and functionalism, using the passive voice in the statutory language as an opening to implement one important purpose of §6501: closure. A concurring opinion by Judge Thornton gives a more robustly functionalist view, resting entirely on the closure purpose of the statute.  And a spirited dissent, authored by Chief Judge Marvel, also presents a functionalist analysis but one that focuses on a different purpose of the statute to come to a different outcome in the case.

What I find particularly interesting about this case is how all three approaches seem to be inconsistent with the Tax Court’s approach to interpreting the §6501(c) exception to §6501(a)’s general three year rule. That statute presents a similar question of statutory interpretation but all of the opinions in last week’s case are contrary to the Tax Court’s rationale in Allen v. Commissioner, 128 T.C. 37 (2007).

Details below the fold.

Continue reading

February 5, 2018 in Bryan Camp, New Cases, Tax, Tax Practice And Procedure | Permalink | Comments (1)

Florida Hosts 8th Annual Tax Policy Lecture

UFThe Florida Graduate Tax Program on Friday hosted its 8th Annual Ellen Bellet Gelberg Tax Policy Lecture by Richard Reeves on Dream Horders, Or: The Political Economy of Tax Policy, followed by a panel discussion with:

  • Lily Batchelder (NYU)
  • William Gale (Brookings Institution)
  • Fred Murray (Florida)

Continue reading

February 5, 2018 in Conferences, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Would A Federal Student Loan Overhaul Bring Down Law School Tuition?

ABA Journal, Would an Overhaul of Federal Student-loan Programs Help Bring Down Law School Tuition?:

Could reforming the federal student-loan program be a way to halt the skyrocketing cost of attending law school? At the 2018 ABA Midyear Meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia, the American Bar Foundation gathered a panel together to discuss the issue in The Perennial (and Stubborn) Challenge of Cost, Affordability and Access in Legal Education: Has it Finally Hit the Fan?

“If I have to put the blame for the title of this panel on any one place, I would put it on these student loan programs and the fact that they are basically unregulated, really, in terms of the amount,” said Barry Currier, the ABA’s managing director of accreditation and legal education.

“The students can borrow as much money through those programs as they want,” Currier said. “So if Harvard Law School or New England Law School said, ‘Tuition at our school next year is $200,000, and living expenses are $50,000,’ the federal government wouldn’t say, ‘You’ve got to be kidding me!’ They would say, ‘Where can we send that check for $250,000?’” ...

Continue reading

February 5, 2018 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (14)

TaxProf Blog Weekend Roundup

Sunday, February 4, 2018

Had Cris Collinsworth Followed His Original Post-NFL Plan To Be A Tax Lawyer, He Would Be Poring Over The New Tax Law Today Rather Than Calling The Super Bowl

CollinsworthMinneapolis Star-Tribune, Calling NFL Games a Taxing Job For Ex-Bengals Receiver Cris Collinsworth:

If his life had unfolded as he planned, Cris Collinsworth wouldn’t be spending this week in the Twin Cities, studying video of the Patriots and Eagles. He’d be in an office, poring over the details of the new U.S. tax code.

The former Bengals receiver began attending law school while still playing in Cincinnati [J.D. 1991, University of Cincinnati College of Law]. Armed with an accounting degree — and an affinity for business and tax law — Collinsworth saw his future in the legal world, even after a radio station asked him to be a fill-in host. ...

Collinsworth’s secondary mission is to share the “terrific story lines’’ of Super Bowl LII.

As he clicked off the list — Eagles quarterback Nick Foles’ comeback! LeGarrette Blount and Chris Long winning rings with the Patriots last year, now playing for Philly! — Collinsworth’s voice bloomed with excitement, in a way it probably wouldn’t have if he were discussing tax law.

“Believe me, I’m not longing for the days when I was going to become a lawyer,’’ he said, laughing. “Especially come tax time.’’

Continue reading

February 4, 2018 in Celebrity Tax Lore, Legal Education, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

NY Times: The Republican Tax Act Could Turn Texas Blue

Texas 3New York Times Sunday Review, The Republican Tax Act Could Turn Texas Blue:

Every major policy overhaul has unanticipated consequences, and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will be no exception. One tantalizing possibility for this one: The Republican tax overhaul helps Democrats in the midterm and 2020 elections by bringing forward the date at which a few critical states — Georgia and possibly even Texas — flip from red to blue.

How might this happen? It stems from the new caps on the home mortgage interest and state and local tax deductions. Restrictions on building have pushed up the costs of housing in expensive coastal blue-state cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York City. High income and property taxes piled onto exorbitant rents and mortgage payments amount to cost-of-living force fields that already deflect talented workers to relatively affordable red-state cities, like Phoenix, Houston, Atlanta and Charlotte, N.C.

Continue reading

February 4, 2018 in Tax, Tax Policy in the Trump Administration | Permalink | Comments (3)

How To Maintain Joy In Your Work As A Lawyer (Or Law Professor)

Happy GoodABA Journal, Loving Life as a Lawyer: How to Maintain Joy in Your Work:

[Nancy Levit (Missouri-Kansas City), co-author of The Happy Lawyer: Making a Good Life in the Law (Oxford University Press 2010) and The Good Lawyer: Seeking Quality in the Practice of Law (Oxford University Press 2014)] shares tips on how to find the work you want to do and how to find joy in the work you’re already doing.

One way to adjust your mindset at work is to look at who you’re spending time with, she says. Are you hanging out with colleagues who have positive outlooks, or with the workplace worrywarts and complainers?

Continue reading

February 4, 2018 in Book Club, Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (1)

The Top Five New Tax Papers

SSRN LogoThere is a bit of movement in this week's list of the Top 5 Recent Tax Paper Downloads, with a new paper debuting on the list at #5.  The #1 paper is #1 and the #2 paper is #2 among 13,327 tax papers in all-time downloads (see Brian Leiter (Chicago), 11 Tax Profs Blow Up The SSRN Download Rankings).

  1. [46,621 Downloads]  The Games They Will Play: Tax Games, Roadblocks, and Glitches Under the New Legislation, by Ari Glogower (Ohio State), David Kamin (NYU), Rebecca Kysar (Brooklyn) & Darien Shanske (UC-Davis) et al.
  2. [31,355 Downloads]  The Games They Will Play: An Update on the Conference Committee Tax Bill, by Ari Glogower (Ohio State), David Kamin (NYU), Rebecca Kysar (Brooklyn) & Darien Shanske (UC-Davis) et al.
  3. [1622 Downloads]  Understanding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, by Sam Donaldson (Georgia State)
  4. [872 Downloads]  Federal Income Tax Treatment of Charitable Contributions Entitling Donor to a State Tax Credit, by Joseph Bankman (Stanford), David Gamage (Indiana), Jacob Goldin (Stanford) & Daniel Hemel (Chicago) et al.
  5. [571 Downloads]  Is New Code Section 199A Really Going to Turn Us All into Independent Contractors?, by Shu-Yi Oei (Boston College) & Diane M. Ring (Boston College)

February 4, 2018 in Scholarship, Tax, Top 5 Downloads | Permalink | Comments (0)

Saturday, February 3, 2018

This Week's Ten Most Popular TaxProf Blog Posts

John Marshall Is Fifteenth Law School To Accept GRE For Admissions

GREJohn Marshall is the fifteenth law school to accept the GRE in lieu of the LSAT, joining (in chronological order): Arizona, Harvard, Northwestern, Georgetown, Hawaii, Washington University, Columbia, St. John's, Texas A&M, Wake Forest, BYU, Brooklyn, George Washington, and Cardozo.  In addition, two law schools allow the GRE in limited circumstances: Chicago (admissions committee may grant LSAT waiver) and UCLA (students enrolled in, or applying to, another UCLA graduate program).

Continue reading

February 3, 2018 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (0)

NY Times: The Economic Impact Of The Trump Tax Cuts

New York Times:  Trump Tax Cuts and the Economy: Time Will Tell, Maybe, by James B. Stewart:

Most presidents will at some point benefit from a surging economy and stock market, but none has claimed more credit for them than Donald J. Trump, as he did again during this week’s State of the Union address. Among the highlights:

  • “$8 trillion and more” in stock market gains.
  • “2.4 million new jobs” created since his election.
  • “Over 3 million workers have gotten tax-cut bonuses” and “rising wages.”
  • All thanks to “the biggest tax cuts and reforms in American history.”

Since the president has frequently complained that the media denies him credit for any of this, I thought it only fair to assess the degree to which the undeniably strong economy, low unemployment and surging stock market are because of Mr. Trump’s achievements, notably his sweeping tax bill.

It turns out that’s no easy task, especially since Mr. Trump has only been president for a year, and the tax legislation is little more than a month old. Economists are still debating the impact on the economy of Ronald Reagan’s 1986 tax reform legislation more than 30 years after its passage.

“It’s not like chemistry or physics where you can do a controlled experiment and change one variable,” said Joel Slemrod, professor of economics and public policy at the University of Michigan, and co-author of a seminal study of the economic impact of the 1986 tax reform act [The Economic Effects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986; see also CBO, Economic Impacts of the Tax Reform Act of 1986: Short-Run and Long-Run Perspectives]. “We can never be entirely sure because we don’t know what would have happened without the tax act.”

Continue reading

February 3, 2018 in Tax, Tax Policy in the Trump Administration | Permalink | Comments (0)

AALS, LSAC Join Forces To Promote Interest In Law School

AALSLSACABA Journal, Project by LSAC, Law Schools Association Aims to Boost Understanding—And Appeal—of Law Profession:

The Law School Admission Council and the Association of American Law Schools are coming together on a project to improve how the public sees the prospects of a legal education and the legal profession.

Consisting of “multiple web-based and social media initiatives” the two groups say in a press release, they want “to leverage both organizations’ substantial platforms to reach a wider audience of prospective students and others interested in law.”

The plan is to create a digital strategy that includes a new website and social media campaign to reach potential law students early, either before or during their undergraduate years. The campaign will provide information on what happens on law campuses, possible uses of a law degree, and the law school application process.

The two organizations will also work together to improve resources for college prelaw advisers and their students.

Continue reading

February 3, 2018 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (0)

Friday, February 2, 2018

Weekly SSRN Tax Article Review And Roundup: Mazur Reviews Cockfield's How Countries Should Share Tax Information

This week, Orly Mazur (SMU) reviews a new work by Arthur J. Cockfield (Queen’s University), How Countries Should Share Tax Information.

Mazur (2017-2)Arthur Cockfield’s new work examines how tax authorities can better share tax information. In recent years, exchange of information (EOI) between countries has dramatically increased as governments worldwide have sought to protect their tax base from offshore tax evasion, international money laundering and aggressive international tax avoidance. Recent initiatives have ranged from the United States’ unilateral enactment of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act to the promotion of bilateral tax information agreements to multilateral efforts to share tax information, such as the common reporting standard and country-by-country reporting. Despite significant progress in this area, it remains questionable how effective these EOI reforms have been in practice.

In his new work, Cockfield persuasively argues that the current international tax regime will likely limit the effectiveness and fairness of these EOI initiatives. 

Continue reading

February 2, 2018 in Scholarship, Tax, Weekly SSRN Roundup | Permalink | Comments (0)

Weekly Legal Education Roundup

Tax Policy In The Trump Administration

Kleinbard: The Right Tax At The Right Time

Florida Tax Review  (2015)Edward Kleinbard (USC), The Right Tax at the Right Time, 21 Fla. Tax Rev. 208 (2017):

The companion paper to this (Capital Taxation in an Age of Inequality, 90 S. Cal. L. Rev. 593 (2017)) argues that a moderate flat-rate (proportional) income tax on capital imposed and collected annually has attractive theoretical and political economy properties that can be harnessed in actual tax instrument design. This paper continues the analysis by specifying in detail how such a tax might be designed.

Continue reading

February 2, 2018 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (1)

Georgetown Hosts Conference Today On Can An Internationally Competitive Tax System Protect Its Tax Base?

Georgetown (2016)The Georgetown Institute of International Economic Law and International Tax Policy Forum host a conference today on  Can an Internationally Competitive Tax System Protect Its Tax Base?:

Recent International Measures to Limit Tax Base Erosion

  • Mihir Desai (Harvard) (moderator)
  • Calum Dewar (PwC)
  • Mike Williams (Director, Business and International Tax, HM Treasury)

Economic Consequences of Limiting Base Erosion with Inbound Investment

  • Michelle Hanlon (MIT) (moderator)
  • Jennifer Blouin (Wharton)
  • Michael Devereux (Oxford)

Continue reading

February 2, 2018 in Conferences, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Policy in the Trump Administration | Permalink | Comments (0)

Three Leadership Role Models For The Law School Dean: Anwar Sadat, William Wilberforce, And John Winthrop

SWWJeffrey A. Brauch (Former Dean, Regent), Three Role Models of Leadership for the Law School Dean, 48 U. Tol. L. Rev. 205 (2017):

This article addresses key leadership traits by examining the lives of successful leaders. It tells the stories of Anwar Sadat, William Wilberforce, and John Winthrop to inspire readers to pursue vision, endurance, and a heart to serve others.

February 2, 2018 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (0)

Nature Versus Nurture: A Look at American Inventors

NBER Digest, Nature Versus Nurture: A Look at American Inventors:

NBER

Children who grow up in particularly innovative geographic areas, or who are exposed to inventors via family connections, are more likely to become inventors.

American inventors are disproportionately likely to be white men who grew up in financially successful families. In Who Becomes an Inventor in America? The Importance of Exposure to Innovation (NBER Working Paper No. 4062), Alexander M. Bell (Harvard), Raj Chetty (Stanford), Xavier Jaravel (London School of Economics), Neviana Petkova (U.S. Treasury Department), & John Van Reenen (MIT) find that children from families in the top 1 percent of the income distribution are 10 times more likely to become inventors than those from families in the bottom 50 percent, and that over 80 percent of 40-year-old inventors are male.

Continue reading

February 2, 2018 in Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

The IRS Scandal, Day 1730: Department Of Justice Settles Last Targeting Case; IRS Apologizes For Delaying Pro-Israel Group's Application For Tax Exempt Status For Seven Years

Z StreetDepartment of Justice Announces Settlement with Z Street Over Improper IRS Treatment:

The Department of Justice today announced that it has entered into a settlement with Z Street, a non-profit corporation dedicated to educating the public about various issues related to Israel and the Middle East, pending approval by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.  Z Street alleged that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) applied heightened scrutiny to applications for tax-exempt status received from organizations connected in any way to Israel, and applied this policy to Z Street’s application, resulting in delay.  The settlement agreement includes an apology from the IRS to Z Street for the delayed processing of the group’s application for tax-exempt status.

“Tax exemption eligibility should be based on whether an organization’s activities fulfill requirements of the law, not a group’s policy positions or the name chosen to reflect those views,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Zuckerman. “The attorneys at the Department of Justice work hard to ensure that all Americans receive equal treatment under the law.  Today’s settlement further illustrates this commitment.”

This is the final settlement in a series of cases brought by groups alleging that their tax-exempt status was delayed by the IRS based on inappropriate criteria, including names and policy positions.  The United States District Court for the District of Columbia recently approved settlement agreements in Linchpins of Liberty v. United States and True the Vote v. IRS. In Norcal Tea Patriots v. IRS, the United States agreed to a settlement in this class action lawsuit which is currently pending approval in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.  In Freedom Path v. IRS, the United States entered into a settlement resolving a wrongful disclosure claim and dismissing other claims, including allegations of improper IRS targeting. A single regulatory challenge remains following the settlement. Freedom Path lost this challenge at the District Court and the issue is currently on appeal to the Fifth Circuit.

Announcement and quote from Attorney General Jeff Sessions in Linchpins of Liberty v. United States and Norcal Tea Patriots v. IRS can be found here.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions Announces Department of Justice has Settled with Plaintiff Groups Improperly Targeted by IRS:

Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced today that the Department of Justice has entered into settlements, pending approval by the district courts, in two cases brought by groups whose tax-exempt status was significantly delayed by the Internal Revenue Service based on inappropriate criteria. The first case, Linchpins of Liberty v. United States, comprised claims brought by 41 plaintiffs, and the second case, NorCal Tea Party Patriots v. Internal Revenue Service, was a class action suit that included 428 members. Attorney General Sessions released the following statement about the cases:

“Chief Justice John Marshall wrote 'that the power to tax involves the power to destroy … [is] not to be denied.' And it should also be without question that our First Amendment prohibits the federal government from treating groups differently based solely on their viewpoint or ideology.”

"But it is now clear that during the last Administration, the IRS began using inappropriate criteria to screen applications for 501(c) status. These criteria included names such as “Tea Party,” “Patriots,” or “9/12” or policy positions concerning government spending or taxes, education of the public to “make America a better place to live,” or statements criticizing how the country was being run. It is also clear these criteria disproportionately impacted conservative groups.”

“As a result of these criteria, the IRS transferred hundreds of applications to a specifically designated group of IRS agents for additional levels of review, questioning and delay. In many instances, the IRS then requested highly sensitive information from applicants, such as donor information, that was not needed to make a determination of tax-exempt status.”

"The IRS’s use of these criteria as a basis for heightened scrutiny was wrong and should never have occurred. It is improper for the IRS to single out groups for different treatment based on their names or ideological positions. Any entitlement to tax exemption should be based on the activities of the organization and whether they fulfill requirements of the law, not the policy positions adopted by members or the name chosen to reflect those views.”

“There is no excuse for this conduct. Hundreds of organizations were affected by these actions, and they deserve an apology from the IRS. We hope that today’s settlement makes clear that this abuse of power will not be tolerated.”

Continue reading

February 2, 2018 in IRS News, IRS Scandal, Tax | Permalink | Comments (11)

Thursday, February 1, 2018

Polsky Presents The Realities of Modern Elite Tax Practice: Management Fee Waivers Today at Duke

Polsky (2015)Gregg Polsky (Georgia) presents The Realities of Modern Elite Tax Practice: A Case Study of the Management Fee Waiver Strategy at Duke today as part of its Tax Policy Workshop Series hosted by Lawrence Zelenak:

For over 15 years, many private equity fund managers have used a technique—known as the management fee waiver—to try to claim what are effectively their weekly paychecks as capital gains.  Recently, the Treasury and IRS explained that, at least in the government’s view, fee waivers (as historically drafted) actually do not work.  Reports of recent significant audit activity relating to fee waivers suggest that the fee waiver saga may finally be coming to an end, but not before billions of tax revenues that are beyond the statute of limitations have been lost forever.

Continue reading

February 1, 2018 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (1)

Brooks Presents The Case For Incrementalism In Tax Reform Today At Indiana

Brooks (John)John R. Brooks (Georgetown) presents The Case for Incrementalism in Tax Reform at Indiana today as part of its Tax Policy Colloquium Series hosted by Leandra Lederman:

In this paper, I will argue that “fundamental tax reform” should not generally by the goal of tax policy. Instead, policymakers should take an incremental approach to policymaking. That is, instead of trying to pick the “best” option among several fully-formed theoretical tax systems, policymakers should work to make incremental improvements to the existing system—they should identify a clear, but narrow, objective, and then work toward that objective with incremental, serial changes, informed by evidence from the previous rounds of changes.

This incrementalist approach to policymaking was first described and formalized by Charles Lindblom in 1959, and it has since then been one of the dominant schools of thought in political science and policy studies, both as a description of actual behavior, but also as an optimal decision procedure. The incrementalist claim is that because policy outcomes are uncertain, our empirical knowledge is limited, and values conflict, we should instead “muddle through” with small targeted changes based on more reliable empirical data and conclusions.

Continue reading

February 1, 2018 in Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink | Comments (0)

Western Michigan-Cooley Law School Files Amended Complaint In Lawsuit Against The ABA

Thomas Cooley Logo (2017)Following up on my previous posts (links below):  ABA Journal, Cooley Law School Wants More ABA Accreditation Transparency and Compliance Letter Off Web:

The ABA needs more transparency when making accreditation determinations for law schools, and it illegally posted a letter to its website regarding Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law School's compliance with an admissions standard, the school argues in an amended complaint filed Jan. 29. 

The council of the ABA’s Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar in November 2017 posted the letter, which detailed an accreditation committee appeal brought by Cooley and heard by the section’s council. The letter stated that the council upheld a September 2017 accreditation committee finding that the school was not in compliance with Standard 501(b), which focuses on admissions, and Interpretation 501-1, which discusses factors to consider in admissions.

Also, the council adopted the accreditation committee recommendation to defer a major change request made by Cooley until the law school could demonstrate that it is in compliance with each accreditation standard. The request reportedly was for acquiescence to open a separate location on the main campus of Western Michigan University, in Kalamazoo, which would offer up to 60 credit hours of the school’s 90-hour JD program.

Continue reading

February 1, 2018 in Legal Education | Permalink | Comments (1)