TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

Saturday, March 4, 2017

Trump Should Retain Funding For The Legal Services Corporation

LSCMinneapolis Star Tribune op-ed: The Trump Budget: Keep Civil Legal Aid Off the Chopping Block, by Robert K. Vischer (Dean, St. Thomas (Minnesota)):

Early drafts indicate that the Trump administration’s forthcoming budget may propose the elimination of the primary funding agency for civil legal aid in this country. Far from being a prudent candidate for elimination, legal aid is a government initiative that promotes individual empowerment and self-reliance — two values that loomed large in President Trump’s campaign and still garner support across the partisan divide. A populist focus on American greatness should bring a renewed commitment to remedy our nation’s scandalous failure to provide the working poor with meaningful access to our civil justice system.

According to the World Justice Project’s survey data, the U.S. ranks dead last (36th out of 36th) among high-income countries on the question of whether people can access and afford civil justice. This shortcoming is nothing new, nor are efforts to close this “justice gap.” In 1974, Congress established the bipartisan, nonprofit Legal Services Corporation (LSC), which distributes funding through a competitive grants process to 134 independent legal aid programs across the country. LSC is, by far, our largest source of civil legal aid funding. These programs help people who live in households with annual incomes at or below 125 percent of the federal poverty guidelines, a category that includes almost 1 in 5 Americans. The most frequent cases involve family law (e.g., protecting victims of domestic violence, guardianship proceedings), consumer issues (e.g., protecting the elderly and vulnerable from being victimized by unscrupulous lenders), housing (e.g., landlord-tenant disputes, renegotiating loans in foreclosure cases), and helping military families with a variety of legal needs.

As a nation, we’ve been heading in the wrong direction in our efforts. In 2015, LSC-funded programs helped 1.8 million people, but recent studies indicate that 80 percent of the civil legal needs of the eligible population are not being met. From 2007 to 2016, funding per eligible person decreased from $7.54 to $5.85. In 2016, Americans spent millions more on Halloween costumes for pets than on Legal Services Corporation grants. 

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2017/03/trump-should-retain-funding-for-the-legal-services-corporation.html

Legal Education | Permalink

Comments

The state governments are perfectly capable of setting up legal aid programs for their own citizens and there's nothing that prevents the maintenance of legal aid societies on donation and endowment income. Why not set up an auxilliary to the judicial department which employs civil practice attorneys on salary to undertake actions in federal court on behalf of indigent plaintiffs (in lieu of annexing local philanthropies)?

Posted by: Art Deco | Mar 6, 2017 11:44:16 AM

Post a comment