TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, May 14, 2015

The IRS Scandal, Day 735

IRS Logo 2Forbes, California Attorney General Can Demand Full IRS Forms From Charity, by Peter J. Reilly:

The Ninth Circuit’s decision in the case of the Center For Competetive Politics v Kamal D. Haris (Attorney General of California) is almost two weeks old and has been covered in other places, so I almost invoked my “You snooze, you lose” rule against myself, but I think I may have something to add. It concerns a fairly obscure issue, but the case does have a loose connection to the interminable IRS scandal (On Day 733 by TaxProf count as I write this).

The Center For Competetive Politics according to its 2013 Form 990 is dedicated to the “Preservation of the First Amendment rights to free political speech, assembly, and petition”. The appointment of the Center’s Chairman, Bradley A. Smith, to the Federal Election Commission was controversial given his vigorous opposition to campaign finance regulation. I guess it kind of looked like putting Daniel Berrigan on the Joint Chiefs of Staff or having Irwin Schiff head up the IRS. The Center received over $1.7 million in contributions and grants in 2013. 

As a 501(c)(3) organization CCP has to tell the IRS who its major donors are. This is done with Schedule B which is attached to the Form 990. Schedule B is not subject to public inspection, so you don’t get to see it on guidestar.org. Many states require charities to attach Form 990 to state filings. The instruction to Form 990 caution charities about not including the schedule of contributors in filings with states that do not ask for it, since they might inadvertently make the donor information publically available. 

It appears that CCP relies very much on a few large donors. The 2013 Form 990 on guidestar.org does not even include a redacted Schedule B, but if you go to the California Attorney General site, there is a Form 990 including a redacted Schedule B for 2011 that shows that of the $1.8 million raised in 2011 over $500,000 came from a single donor. Over $800,000 came from just seven donors who gave between $85,000 and $211,250.

The IRS knows who those seven donors are, but they are not going to tell us. The California Attorney General would also like to know who those donors are, without making them public. So the AG is requiring that CCP provided an unredacted copy of Schedule B. CCP does not want to do that . The Ninth Circuit just told them that they have to.

There were two arguments that CCP made. The first was that the disclosure requirement is injurious to the Center and its supporters’ exercise of their First Amendment rights. They referred to a “chilling risk”. So you feel OK giving money to CCP even thought Lois Lerner’s minions know who you are, but you draw the line when it comes to the California AG. The Court indicated that that sort of concern was subject to “exacting scrutiny” under which the government’s interest in obtainging the information must be weighed against actual damage to First Amendment rights. ...

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2015/05/the-irs-8.html

IRS News, IRS Scandal, Tax | Permalink

Comments

A "loose connection" to the IRS "scandal?" This story has a loose connection, but it is not to the IRS "scandal." Friends, CCP is a 501(c)(3). That means its donors get to deduct their "donations" to CCP. The only thing scandalous here is the fact that Sch. B is not publicly available--everybody should be able to know who is getting a tax deduction for a donation.

Posted by: Publius Novus | May 14, 2015 8:19:11 AM

Anonymous speech is free speech. Our friends to the left think that the first amendment only applies to crucifixes in jars of urine, burning the American flag, and watching porn in the kiddie section of the library while feeling yourself up.

Donors are protected because otherwise they can be attacked and bullied, like Democrats used to do to those who gave money to the NAACP and other civil rights groups.

We need to be on the look out for information requested by California's AG being leaked to Democrat activist groups as was done by the IRS at a national level.

We can't let Democrat mobsters intimidate American citizens from participating in our society. What is this the 1940's all over again?

You think Democrats would be a little more self aware considering their past behavior.

Posted by: wodun | May 14, 2015 3:53:28 PM

Post a comment