TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron, Dean
Pepperdine University School of Law

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Solove: The Fundamental Problem with the U.S. News School Rankings

U.S. News 2015Daniel Solove (George Washington), The Fundamental Problem with the US News School Rankings:

Last week, all the law schools in America were holding their collective breaths for the latest pronouncement by US News about how their school ranked. For law schools, as well as other graduate schools as well as universities, the US News rankings play an enormously influential role. The rankings affect the number and quality of applicants. Employers use the rankings too, and the rankings thus affect job opportunities. The careers of law school deans can rise and fall on the rankings too. Key decisions about legal education are made based on the potential affect on ranking, as are admissions decisions and financial aid decisions.

In the law school world, grumbling about the US News rankings never ceases. The rankings use a formula that takes into account a host of factors that are often not very relevant, that can easily be misreported, skewed, or gamed, and that ultimately say little of value about the quality or reputation of a school. Each year, I read fervent outcries to US News to improve their formula. These cries are deftly answered with a response that is typically a variant of the following: "We'll look into this. We are always looking to improve our ranking formula." Not much changes, though. The formula is tweaked a little bit, but the changes are never dramatic.

And yet each year, we keep grumbling, keep hoping that someday Godot will arrive and US News will create a truly rigorous ranking.

We should stop hoping.

It isn't going to happen. This is because there is a fundamental problem at the heart of the US News rankings -- doing a rigorous and more accurate ranking is at odds with the economic interest of US News, which is to make money by selling its rankings to eager buyers each year and getting people to visit their site.

Law School Rankings, Legal Education | Permalink


Mr. Solove's analysis makes some very good point. One additional problem is that the employment statistics count school funded, low paying one year jobs the same as real jobs, the same as any other. George Washington puts roughly 20% of its class - which is a huge number roughly 120 students -- into such jobs. Thus, they moved up the rankings this year, even though their non-school funded results would seem to lag other similarly ranked schools.

Posted by: JP | Mar 18, 2014 9:09:36 AM