TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Formula Clauses After Wandry

Patrick J. Duffey (The Duffey Law Firm, Boca Raton, FL), Brian K. Duffey (The Duffey Law Firm, Boca Raton, FL) & Lee-ford Tritt (Florida), A Question of Value: The Evolution of Formula Clauses Through The Decades, 47 Real Prop. Tr.& Est. 467 L.J. (2013):

Wealthy families often use closely-held businesses to manage, preserve, and transfer wealth. These entities are difficult to value and, therefore, present estate planning and transfer challenges when owners attempt to give or sell portions of the business. Attorneys often use formula clauses to ensure predictability in the parties' expected tax liability. Recently, the Tax Court decided Wandry v. Commissioner [T.C. Memo. 2012-88 (Mar. 26, 2012)] in favor of the taxpayer, where the taxable transfer employed a defined value clause with a non-charitable valve. Until this decision, courts have endorsed only the use of charitable valves in conjunction with defined value clauses. This Article analyzes the Tax Court's decision in Wandry and attempts to fit it within well-established case law decided in the last century. Although Wandry was decided in favor of the taxpayer, this Article suggests that attorneys who step outside the boundaries of court-blessed formula clauses do so at their own risk.

Prior TaxProf Blog coverage:

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2013/05/formula-clauses.html

Scholarship, Tax | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef019102562b06970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Formula Clauses After Wandry:

Comments