TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, April 19, 2013

Brunson: Preventing IRS Abuse of the Tax System

Florida Tax ReviewSamuel D. Brunson (Loyola-Chicago), Watching the Watchers: Preventing IRS Abuse of the Tax System, 14 Fla. Tax Rev. ___ (2013):

As a result of broad outcries against the incompetence and aggressiveness of the IRS, Congress reined in its behavior, requiring it to focus on treating taxpayers as customers. Congress also created oversight bodies to ensure that the IRS would comply with the new mandate. Though those oversight bodies face some difficulties — most notably, the unwillingness of Congress to adequately fund them — they nonetheless have proven effective at checking the IRS’s misbehavior with regard to taxpayers.

Congress has not, however, been as solicitous to the tax law itself. The IRS can act in ways that violate both the letter and the intent of the tax law. Where such violations either provide benefits to select groups of taxpayers without directly harming others, or where the harm to taxpayers is de minimis, nobody has the ability or incentive to challenge the IRS and require it to enforce the tax law as written.

Congress could control the IRS’s abuse of the tax law. Using insights from the literature of administrative oversight, this Article proposes that Congress provide standing on third parties to challenge IRS actions. If properly designed and implemented, such “fire-alarm oversight” would permit oversight at a significantly lower cost than creating another oversight board. At the same time, it would be more effective at finding and responding to IRS abuse of the tax system and would generally preserve the IRS’s administrative discretion in deciding how to enforce the tax law.

Scholarship, Tax | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brunson: Preventing IRS Abuse of the Tax System:


"If properly designed and implemented" -- here's a radical thought: why not "properly design and implement" the tax law itself, rather than try to put band-aids on its enforcer?

Posted by: dan | Apr 20, 2013 8:31:13 AM