March 4, 2013
Shaviro Presents Should Social Security and Medicare be More Market Based? Today at Illinois
Daniel N. Shaviro (NYU) delivers the Ann F. Baum Memorial Lecture on Elder Law at Illinois today on Should Social Security and Medicare be More Market Based?:
Contemporary political debate about Social Security and Medicare often conflates the issue of the programs’ long-term fiscal sustainability with that of whether their design should be made more market-based, such as by transforming Social Security into a private accounts program and Medicare into a voucher-based program. In fact, the sustainability and design issues are fundamentally separate.
This article assesses the case for making the programs more market-based by using two main conceptual vehicles: (1) the model for understanding the programs’ substantive features and rationales that I offered in my books, Making Sense of Social Security Reform and Who Should Pay for Medicare?, and (2) Paul Samuelson’s classic description of Social Security as providing what we would now call an implicit financial instrument that reflects an intergenerational compact. In the end, it reaches largely skeptical conclusions about altering the programs to use either private accounts or vouchers.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Shaviro Presents Should Social Security and Medicare be More Market Based? Today at Illinois: