TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, October 19, 2012

Pratt Presents A Critique of Anti-Obesity Soda Taxes and Food Taxes Today in New Zealand

PrattKatherine Pratt (Loyola-L.A.) presents A Constructive Critique of Public Health Arguments for Anti-Obesity Soda Taxes and Food Taxes, 86 Tul. L. Rev. ___ (2012), today at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Obesity Society:

This Article constructively critiques the two arguments that public health advocates have made in support of anti-obesity soda taxes or junk food taxes. Part I discusses and critiques the first argument, an economic “externalities” argument that government should tax soda or junk food to internalize the disproportionately high health care costs of obesity. Part I also explores alternative economic “internalities” arguments for food or soda taxes, with a focus on incomplete information, bounded rationality, and bounded willpower. Part II discusses and critiques the second argument made by public health advocates, that government should adopt anti-obesity measures to improve population-wide health. This Part considers the appropriate scope of public health law interventions with respect to behavioral risk factors (e.g., diet), comments on empirical evidence offered by public health advocates to support proposed soda taxes, and cautions public health advocates to consider possible unintended consequences of anti-obesity proposals.

Obesity policy debates present a conflict of fundamental values, such as health, fairness, efficiency, and autonomy. Part III attempts to reconcile these values and responds to the “personal responsibility” objection to soda taxes and food taxes. Part IV considers various factors that would affect behavioral responses to proposed soda taxes and food taxes and addresses concerns that such taxes would be regressive and thus unfair to low-income consumers. This Part also explores the tax design implications of the literature on tax salience and on asymmetric paternalism and libertarian paternalism. Park V suggests the way forward for public health advocates, including a proposal to enact a tax on nutritionally poor foods and drinks, paired with a salient benefit. This Part also recommends enactment of a federal system of food classification, based on nutrient profiling methods, along with a federal system of “front-of-package” nutritional labeling.

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2012/10/pratt-presents.html

Conferences, Scholarship, Tax | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef017c32723a85970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pratt Presents A Critique of Anti-Obesity Soda Taxes and Food Taxes Today in New Zealand:

Comments

Such taxes shouldn't be taken seriously.

Posted by: Woody | Oct 19, 2012 5:14:57 PM