April 30, 2012
Henderson: The Science Behind the Yale Law School Gender Imbalance Report
A just released study by the Yale Law Women documents that class participation at Yale Law tends to be disproportionately male. ... Although the report offers prescriptive advice for Yale faculty and students on how to close the gap, it does not offer an empirically grounded explanation for why the gap exists in the first place. Coincidentally, I recently read another empirical study that appears to offer an answer.
In an article in the 2012 volume of Adminstrative Science Quarterly, Yale School of Management professor Victoria Brescoll provides compelling evidence that different power rules apply to women than men. Brescoll's article, "Who Takes the Floor and Why: Gender, Power, and Volubility in Organizations," found that when women possess the same objective measures of power as men, they are reluctant to use that power to speak up (i.e., be voluble) in organizational settings.
Why are powerful women less likely to speak up? Because of fear of backlash. Further, the fear is justified. Specifically, holding the objective measures of power constant, Brescoll found that when women were more voluble in meetings, they tended to be viewed as less likeable and deserving--and here is the kicker, less likeable and deserving at roughly the same levels by both male and female peers. In contrast, when powerful men were more voluble, their peers--both males and females--viewed them as more likeable and more deserving.
- The Legal Whiteboard, Reaction to the Reactions to the Yale Law Women's Speak Up Report, by Jeff Lipshaw (Suffolk)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Henderson: The Science Behind the Yale Law School Gender Imbalance Report:
Maybe the women just talk less when they have nothing to say.
Posted by: michael livingston | May 1, 2012 5:44:26 AM