January 18, 2012
Tax Court Rejects Buy.com Founder's $45 Million OPIS Tax Shelter
Blum v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-16 (Jan. 17, 2012):
This Court has not previously considered an Offshore Portfolio Investment Strategy (OPIS) transaction. The question before us is whether petitioners are entitled to deduct certain capital losses claimed from their participation in the OPIS transaction. We hold that they are not because the transaction lacks economic substance. We must also decide whether petitioners are liable for gross valuation misstatement penalties and negligence penalties under § 6662(a). We hold they are liable for the penalties.Petitioners claimed an artificial loss of over $45 million. This is exactly the type of “too good to be true” transaction that should cause a savvy, experienced businessman to seek independent advice. See Neonatology Associates, P.A. v. Commissioner, 299 F.3d at 234 (“When, as here, a taxpayer is presented with what would appear to be a fabulous opportunity to avoid tax obligations, he should recognize that he proceeds at his own peril.”). ... Petitioners’ decision to rely exclusively on KPMG in structuring, facilitating and reporting their OPIS transaction was therefore not reasonable. Petitioners did not take their position in good faith and thus lacked reasonable cause for that position. Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination that petitioners are liable for accuracy-related penalties for 1998 and 1999.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tax Court Rejects Buy.com Founder's $45 Million OPIS Tax Shelter:
» Buy.com founder learns the truth about the Tax Fairy from Roth & Company, P.C.
There is no tax fairy, despite of the best efforts of big law and accounting firms a decade ago. The... [Read More]
Tracked on Jan 19, 2012 9:20:52 AM