TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Taxpayer With Tax LL.M. Lacked Substantial Authority for Tax Return Position

Brown v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2011-83 (Apr. 12, 2011):

In 2005, Bruce Brown held a life insurance contract with Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company. On December 18, 2005, Northwestern terminated the contract, using its entire cash value of $37,365.06 to pay policy debt. Petitioners (the Browns) did not report any gain or loss on their 2005 federal income tax return from the termination of the life insurance contract.

In a notice dated December 24, 2007, respondent (the IRS) determined a deficiency in tax of $8,553 for tax year 2005. The deficiency was the result of the IRS’s determination that Mr. Brown recognized a taxable gain of $29,093.30 on termination of the Northwestern contract. The IRS also determined that the Browns were liable for a penalty of $1,711 under § 6662. The Browns dispute those determinations. ...

Bruce Brown is a commercial litigation attorney who has been licensed since 1973. His wife, Carol Anfinson Brown, is also an attorney. She has a master of laws degree (LL.M.) in taxation. ...

Northwestern sent Mr. Brown a Form 1099-R, Distributions From Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc. The Form 1099-R showed a gross distribution of $37,365.06 and a taxable amount of $29,093.30. ... According to Northwestern’s calculations, the $29,093.30 taxable amount was equal to the policy’s cash value of $37,365.06 minus what it called “net cost” of $8,271.76. ... [W]e agree with the IRS that the Browns were required to include $29,093.30 in gross income from the termination of the Northwestern life insurance contract. ...

[T]he Browns’ experience, knowledge, and education weigh against them: both are licensed attorneys, and one has a master of laws degree (LL.M.) in taxation. In short, the Browns have failed to show that they had reasonable cause for and acted in good faith regarding the underpayment. We therefore find that the IRS correctly determined that the Browns are liable for the substantial understatement penalty under § 6662(a).

(Hat Tip: Bob Kamman.)

Update: Tax Update Blog, The Perils of Too Much Education

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2011/04/taxpayer-with-.html

New Cases, Tax | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef014e60d1a53b970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Taxpayer With Tax LL.M. Lacked Substantial Authority for Tax Return Position:

» The perils of too much education from Roth & Company, P.C.
We take for granted that in a technical field like taxation, more education is better. And that's true, until you... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 13, 2011 5:23:30 AM

Comments

Didn't they own the contract before, and didn't they get the cash value in place of the contract after?

How did they make money? All that occured is the contract was converted to its cash value.

Posted by: DonM | Apr 13, 2011 4:15:20 PM