April 28, 2011
Fleischer: Equality of Opportunity & Charitable Tax SubsidiesMiranda Perry Fleischer (Colorado) has published Equality of Opportunity and the Charitable Tax Subsidies, 91 B.U. L. Rev. 601 (2011). Here is the abstract:
Americans cherish the notion of equality of opportunity, believing that it protects a commitment to liberty and neutrality. Despite the importance of equal opportunity principles in our society, most legal scholarship invoking the concept often fails to address complexities raised by the political philosophy literature, such as the “equality of what” debate. Moreover, current scholarship on the charitable tax subsidies overemphasizes the benefits of efficiency and pluralism to the detriment of distributive justice, resulting in substantial normative gaps. For example, which organizations should be subsidized? Should charities be required to assist the poor? Is a deduction or a credit preferable?
This Article carefully mines the equal opportunity philosophy literature for insights into those questions. Often, these nuances lend rigorous philosophical support for commonly held intuitions. The basic version of ex ante equality of material resources, for example, confirms the intuition that the charitable sector does not do enough to provide opportunities for the financially poor to participate fully in our society. Other insights seem counter-intuitive: a broader version of resource equality that addresses talent-pooling and expensive tastes suggests that we continue to subsidize elite cultural institutions, such as the opera, without requiring them to offer free or discounted services to the poor.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Fleischer: Equality of Opportunity & Charitable Tax Subsidies:
charitable tax subsidies overemphasizes the benefits of efficiency and pluralism to the detriment of distributive justice
I will dictate where your money should go? Too much to the Boy Scouts?
without requiring them to offer free or discounted services to the poor.
Does he list the orgs which don't?
confirms the intuition that the charitable sector does not do enough to provide opportunities for the financially poor to participate fully in our society
How is he going to get "the poor" in the door? By gunpoint? Sweep them off the street, lock them in or bind them to the chair?
If they have a program or programs in place - work more on outreach? But isn't it still the choice in the end on whether or not to attend?
And yes, I do contribute to our Symphony's Educational Outreach Program.
Just because the program is there, doesn't necessarily mean the program will be utilized or utilized to its potential.
Posted by: Sandy P | Apr 28, 2011 12:16:28 PM