TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Chris Christie v. Pat Quinn

Following up on my recent posts (links below) on the gigantic individual (67%) and business (45%) income tax hikes recently approved in Illinois: New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is running this ad soliciting Illinois businesses to move to his state:

Illinois Governor Pat Quinn is not pleased:

 

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2011/01/chris-christie-v-pat-quinn.html

Tax | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef0148c82b9e14970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Chris Christie v. Pat Quinn:

Comments

Gov Quinn is mistaken in that when Gov. Christie cancelled a tunnel project, he did not pay back about $300 million to the Federal Government. Like the pension contribution, he just decided not to make the payment.

In New Jersey they deal with debts the old fashioned way, they just don't pay them.

Posted by: Sid (real one) | Jan 31, 2011 5:26:06 AM

Aren't both state's highly unionized? I just don't see either as being particularly pro-business. Illinois businesses should really move to the south -- Florida or Texas.

Posted by: anon | Jan 31, 2011 7:34:02 AM

Regarding Quinn's rebuttal, I don't think that businesses are terribly concerned about a state not paying overbloated union employee pensions promised by former politicians who knew that there was no way to pay them, having to fire teachers when the teacher's union refused to make any concessions so that those jobs could be saved, or cancelling a massive and overbudget project before it began costing billions that would have to be made up from higher taxes.

Businesses want to make money for its investors, and they have little interest in staying in a state that raises taxes to support unions and waste. Quinn loses that debate.

Posted by: Woody | Jan 31, 2011 8:21:45 AM