December 14, 2010
Zelinsky: Tax Considerations of Cliff Lee's Deal with the PhilliesEdward Zelinsky (Cardozo), Tax Considerations and Cliff Lee's Deal with the Phillies:
[T]houghts on Cliff Lee's decision to sign with the Phillies for 5-year, guaranteed $120 million (instead of signing with the Yankees for 6-years, guaranteed $132 million, or the Rangers for 6-years, guaranteed $138 million -- both the Yankees and Rangers offered 7th year vesting options, too):
Cliff Lee's decision to go to Philadelphia is interesting from a state and local tax perspective. It had appeared that Lee's choice was between the Yankees (in a state with some of the nation's highest state income tax rates) and the Rangers (in a state with no state income tax). Presumably, the Yankees' bid was designed to offset some or all of the tax disadvantages of playing in New York.
The Phillies confronted essentially the same tax competition with the Rangers as did the Yankees. Pennsylvania is a high tax state in which to live and work. The City of Philadelphia has been among the most aggressive municipalities taxing nonresident athletes for the days they play in Philadelphia.
The obvious lesson is that taxes aren't everything.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Zelinsky: Tax Considerations of Cliff Lee's Deal with the Phillies:
"The obvious lesson is that taxes aren't everything."
Sadly, not enough people can recognize this simple truth. Its not that taxes don't matter, its just they aren't the entire ballgame (whether for personal or business reasons). Otherwise, Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina, Tennessee, would be the homes of Cisco, Intel, Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, Oracle, etc.... Funny how a lack of intellectual capital can relegate you to being a welfare state.
Posted by: Nolo Contendre | Dec 14, 2010 5:19:32 PM