TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

TIGTA to Investigate White House Disclosure of Confidential Taxpayer Data of Political Opponent

TIGTA The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration announced yesterday that it would investigate whether Obama Administration officials illegally accessed and disclosed confidential taxpayer information involving Koch Industries, a prominent critic of the Obama Adminstration.

Prior TaxProf Blog coverage 

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2010/10/tigta-to.html

IRS News, Political News, Tax | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef0133f4e084ea970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference TIGTA to Investigate White House Disclosure of Confidential Taxpayer Data of Political Opponent:

Comments

Why don't they just skip the investigation? It's sorta like we know they did, else how could they say what they said?

Punishment phase in .... oh, I forgot, they're Democrats. Just children playing, no harm no foul, right?

Posted by: Bill Johnson | Oct 6, 2010 5:48:04 AM

Shades of Nixon's "enemies list."

Posted by: Ed D | Oct 6, 2010 6:44:40 AM

The symbol of the key on the Inspector General's crest (above) should signify security. At least that is what a key normally means on a unit crest. The balance symbolizes justice. We'll see whether the new crest should be changed to show Obama's hand on one or the other or both.

Posted by: Diggs | Oct 6, 2010 6:56:16 AM

From the TIGTA webpage:

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) was established under the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 to provide independent oversight of IRS activities. TIGTA promotes the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in the administration of the internal revenue laws. It is also committed to the prevention and detection of fraud, waste, and abuse within the IRS and related entities.

Nevertheless, TIGTA has ignored IRS instructions that result in the exclusion from alternative minimum taxable income of tax refunds from tax overpayments claimed on Schedule A in years when the regular tax was paid. This exclusion violates section 56(b(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code and currently results in a loss to the Treasury of approximately one billion dollars per year.

Of course, TIGTA has allowed this loss to be offset by IRS illegally including itemized deductions in the phase-out of deductions, exemptions, exclusions, eligibilities, and credits in violation of section 111(a) of the Internal Revenue Code

Posted by: WD Kebschull | Oct 6, 2010 10:11:59 AM

You folks aren't biased are you? Actually, I don't know if any Obama Administration officials violated section 6103 by their statements. The sub-S status of Koch industries is well and widely known, and is sourced in published court opinions. If that is the source of the White House statement, then there was no section 6103 violation (execept, perhaps, in the Fifth and Eighth Circuits).

What is certain, however, is that by announcing a probe of the White House for possible Title 26 violations, TIGTA clearly violated section 6103.

Posted by: Publius Novus | Oct 6, 2010 10:15:05 AM

Obama's type government can ruin you with tax audits or kill you with withheld health care and now he's working on the 4th Amendment abridgment so that he can access everything you say or write by computer so to better make a decision whether it will be jail or death. We were warned about 'governments' like this, its the reason the Constitution and Bill of Rights were written, its also the reason the Supreme Court has been packed by socialists who don't believe in the Constitution. We really need an 2/3rds Amendment so that the States can roll back any thing the government passes that is illiberal and dangerous to the People, we need it now.

Posted by: Ron Nord | Oct 6, 2010 10:33:30 AM

Why exactly would any private for-profit entity today be anything other than a pass-through entity? Sub-S, LLC, partnership, take your pick. It would be extremely surprising to find profitable private businesses as C-Corporations at any significant level. Sure, they may hold some C's to offset gains in affiliated C-Corps, but the top structure would be pass-through.

I think this is a kind of frivolous political gotcha moment rather than a serious concern.

If anyone thought the Koch's interests were other than pass-through entities, they must have been pretty naive.

Posted by: Dan D | Oct 6, 2010 11:14:29 AM

Unless there's a lot more to this story, I don't see a significant violation. I guess the purpose of the investigation is to make sure there's nothing more.

Posted by: AMTbuff | Oct 6, 2010 11:42:21 AM

Just one more nail in the coffin of impeachment.

Posted by: warlord | Oct 6, 2010 2:26:24 PM