« CB&PP: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends | Main | Zelinsky: Clintons Made $100m Since 2000, So Why Must Taxpayers Pay $2m/Year for Post-Presidential Perks? »

April 11, 2008

Thorndike: Why We Should Care About a Presidential Candidate's Tax Returns

Joseph J. Thorndike (Contributing Editor, Tax Analysts) has published Private Returns, Public Rewards: The Politics of Tax Records on the Tax History Project web site:

Should we care [about the tax returns of Presidential candidates]?  Well, yes.  And not just for the voyeuristic thrill that tax returns provide (or voyeuristic creep-out: recall candidate Bill Clinton's itemized deduction for donating used underwear to the Salvation Army -- some good deeds are best left unadvertised). Voters should care about a candidate's tax returns because they provide a valuable window on his or her integrity. ... [A] candidate's tax returns can still be important, even if they don't include a smoking gun. Public returns can reveal points of inconsistency between a candidate's public rhetoric and his or her private finances. Which is no small thing, especially when a candidate makes a point of targeting tax avoidance.

The Tax History Project has added Franklin D. Roosevelt's tax returns from 1913-1937.

April 11, 2008 in Political News | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/22255/27990064

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Thorndike: Why We Should Care About a Presidential Candidate's Tax Returns:

Comments

The argument: releasing returns makes it easier to find a "gotcha!" moment. IMHO, political discourse is already super-saturated w/ those. What we don't need is more "ZOMG! Look at the size of John Edwards's house! He can't want to fight poverty with a house that big, and if he does he's a hypocrite!"

If there's anything more substantive than that in the "inconsistency between public rhetoric and private finance," I can't find it.

Posted by: jpe | Apr 11, 2008 1:01:57 PM

Post a comment