TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, April 24, 2008

Government Loses Son-of-BOSS Tax Shelter Case

The Government on Tuesday lost an important Son-of-BOSS tax shelter case in the U.S. District Court in Colorado.  Sala v. United States, No. 05-cv-00636 (D. CO 4/22/08):

Although Sala had income in 2000 of more than $60 million, he claimed a tax loss that essentially nullified his tax burden. Sala achieved the alleged loss through his involvement in a foreign currency options investment transaction known as Deerhurst. Sala filed an amended return on November 18, 2003, eliminating the loss claimed on his original 2000 return and paying over $26 million in taxes, plus penalties and interest. Sala later filed another amended return reclaiming the tax loss and seeking a refund of the taxes, interest, and penalties. The Government contends Sala is not entitled to claim the tax loss because Deerhurst was an improper tax shelter. Sala disagrees, and brought suit against the Government to obtain a refund of the taxes, interest, and penalties he paid to the Government.

An eight day trial to the Court in this matter was held commencing March 10, 2008, and concluding March 19, 2008. The two claims at issue were Sala’s entitlement to a refund of the taxes, penalties, and interest he paid on his 2000 income and—to the extent any refund was due Sala on putatively “excess” interest—the Government’s entitlement to an accuracy-related penalty owed, but not assessed. After a review of all the evidence presented both at trial and by deposition, I find in favor of Carlos Sala and Tina Zanolini-Sala and against the Government on all claims and counterclaims. ...

Conclusion

In summary, I find and conclude: (1) Sala’s participation in the Deerhurst Program possessed a reasonable possibility of profits beyond the tax benefits, was entered into for a business purpose other than tax avoidance, and was motivated by a desire for profits above and beyond the tax benefits sought; (2) Sala’s basis in Solid Currencies was approximately $69 million—the value of the long options contributed plus the cash contributed—and Solid Currencies’ basis in Deerhurst GP was an identical amount; (3) the 24 options contracts contributed by Sala to Solid Currencies and by Solid Currencies to Deerhurst GP were separate financial instruments; (4) Solid Currencies received property upon the liquidation of Deerhurst GP; (5) the Treasury exceeded its authority when issuing 26 C.F.R. § 1.752-6(b)(2); (6) the Treasury exceeded its authority when making 26 C.F.R. § 1.752-6 retroactive; (7) Sala filed a

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2008/04/government-lose.html

New Cases | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef00e5520e79828834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Government Loses Son-of-BOSS Tax Shelter Case:

Comments

Appallingly bad decision!

Posted by: Gwailo | Apr 25, 2008 6:32:50 PM

Not clear on a few issues.
Whatis the status of the corrected regulation issued by the IRS. It is valid, but not valid retroactively?
Or it is not valid?

What is the status of transfers of long and short options. Long = assets, short = do not count?
Opens possibility for many similar trades for tax purposes? care to comment?

Posted by: E | Jun 4, 2008 8:43:25 AM