« Senate Holds Hearing Today on Federal Estate Tax Alternatives | Main | Sassville Presents Tax Treaties: Better the Devil We Know? Today at Toronto »
March 12, 2008
The Obama Tax Hike
Interesting op-ed in today's Wall Street Journal: The Obama Tax Hike, by Andrew G. Biggs:
Until recently, Sen. Barack Obama took a responsible position on Social Security, noting the urgency of reform and saying all options should be on the table. But having cornered himself among Democratic activists whose attitudes toward Social Security reform range from demagoguery to denial, Mr. Obama has recently veered sharply left. He now proposes to solve the looming Social Security shortfall exclusively with higher taxes.
"Once people are making over $200,000 to $250,000," Mr. Obama says, "they can afford to pay a little more in payroll tax." No shared sacrifice, no outreach to moderates or conservatives, here.
Mr. Obama's proposal is to make a significant change to the payroll tax system. Currently, all wages below about $100,000 are subject to a 12.4% Social Security payroll tax. But all wages above that amount are not subject to the tax. Mr. Obama wants to eliminate the cap, but, in a concession to taxpayers, exempt wages between $100,000 and $200,000. He wants to create a "donut hole" in the taxing mechanism that pays for the nation's largest retirement program.
The problem is two-fold: His proposal would be a very large tax hike, yet it won't be enough.
March 12, 2008 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/22255/27020138
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Obama Tax Hike:
Comments
Obama isn't the first politician to change his mind for votes. What I find curious is the "donut hole" itself, and how many voters would actually fall within it. SS is clearly a problem that the next administration will have to deal with however, asking a worker to pay an additional 12.4% on their earned income is asking alot.
Posted by: gman | Mar 12, 2008 5:39:47 PM
Having everyone pay SS is a good thing. The tax is regressive.
Posted by: jimbo | Mar 13, 2008 11:23:55 AM






