« TRAC Charges IRS Is Flouting Court Order to Disclose Data | Main | Senate Bill Seeks to Restrict Judges' Travel to Law Schools »

February 11, 2008

ABA Approves New Objective Bar Passage Accreditation Standard

The ABA House of Delegates today passed Interpretation 301-6, imposing a new objective bar passage standard for law school accreditation. Under the new rule, over a five-year period (1) 75% of a school's graduates must have passed the bar, or (2) the school's annual first-time bar passage rate in state(s) in which at least 70% of its graduates take the bar must not be more than 15 percentage points below the average first-time bar passage rate in that state(s) for at least three of the years.

From the ABA Journal (ABA Approves Bar Pass Standards for Accreditation):

Victor M. Marquez, president of the Hispanic National Bar Association ... said the change will disadvantage Hispanic and African-American law students. ... A representative of the largely African-American National Bar Association also opposed the measure, as did the Philadelphia Bar Association.

More than five former ABA Presidents – including the only two minorities who have held that post – favored the measure, as did the Law Student Division.

David M. Zlotnick, Associate Dean & Distinguished Service Professor of Law at Roger Williams, offers these thoughts on the passage of Interpretation 301-6:

In an earlier post, Professor Caron included Roger Williams University School of Law in a chart listing institutions that might not meet the new ABA bar-passage rule. While Professor Caron has since posted a corrected explanation of the new standard, I am concerned that there might be some lingering sense that Roger Williams Law is a weak bar-pass school. In fact, the reverse is true.

The provision of the new ABA rule applicable to Roger Williams Law requires that, for three of the past five years, first-time test takers cannot score more than 15 percent below a state’s average (adding as many states as necessary to get to 70 percent of the school’s graduates for each year). Over the past five years, however, Roger Williams Law has never experienced a year in which 70 percent of first-time takers fell below the 15 percent mark – nor have we even come close to that trigger. If the past is any prologue, Roger Williams Law is at no risk of failing under the new rule.

Moreover, it is worth noting that our 2007 bar pass results were stellar. In the three jurisdictions where the vast majority of our students take the exam, our current statistics for first-time takers are as follows: a 90 percent pass rate in Connecticut, an 85 percent pass rate in Massachusetts, and 79 percent pass rate in RI. These numbers likely will put us over the average pass rates for first-time takers in these states by about three percent. In fact, among law schools with thirty or more test-takers, Roger Williams Law had the highest pass rate on the Connecticut bar in 2007. That means we beat many schools with much higher U.S. News rankings, both in Connecticut and in our other key states.

We are proud of the strong student culture that we have created here at Roger Williams Law. We believe that our bar pass success flows from a rigorous, yet supportive environment in which students get a personalized education at a relatively small institution.

Much appreciation to Professor Caron for allowing this "op ed" response on his blog.

February 11, 2008 in Law School | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef00e550427fc38834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference ABA Approves New Objective Bar Passage Accreditation Standard:

Comments

I'm trying to understand this measure, and it seems to me as if all a school has to do is make sure that as a percentage of students who take the bar, when compared to the average pass percentage rate, that it is no less than 15% below the average pass rate. Example: School is located in State X. State X has a 75% pass rate. So long as as 60% of School's graduates who take the bar in State X pass the bar exam, the school can maintain it's accreditation?

This sounds incredibly weak to me, but I might be off base with my analysis.

Posted by: Anon... | Feb 12, 2008 10:43:53 AM

Reply to Anon:

You're right, up to a point. This would be the case as long as at least 70% of the school's graduates sat for the bar in State X.

However, for the sake of argument, let's say that only 50% of the school's graduates sit in State X. Under 301-6, they then have to add their results in additional jurisdictions, in descending order of frequency, until they reach at least 70% of graduates.

For our example, let's say that 20% of the students sit in State Y, where again 60% of the school's graduates pass, but the state pass rate is 80%. The school's pass rate remains at 60%... but now they're out of compliance, because 301-6 mandates that the comparison pass rate be a weighted average of each state's pass rates. Here, weighting by numbers of graduates results in a comparison pass rate of 76.4%.

However, we're not done. The standard states that a minimum of 70% of graduates must be counted, but does not require that a school stop at 70%. Let's say that 10% of graduates sat in the next-most-popular jurisdiction, State Z. Again, 60% of the school's graduates passed, but the State Z pass rate is only 65%.

Now, with 80% of graduates counted, the weighted comparison pass rate is 75%, which puts the school back into compliance.

Hope this helps you out.

Posted by: Dale Arnett | Feb 19, 2008 3:42:43 PM