TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, September 21, 2007

Yale & Galle on Can Discriminatory State Taxation of Municipal Bonds Be Justified?

Ethan Yale (Georgetown) & Brian Galle (Florida State) have posted their forthcoming article, Can Discriminatory State Taxation of Municipal Bonds Be Justified? Thoughts on the Davis Topside Briefs, 116 Tax Notes ___ (2007), on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

This Report continues our analysis of Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis, a case scheduled for argument in the upcoming Supreme Court term. The issue in Davis is the constitutionality of Kentucky's practice (shared by all other states with an income tax) of taxing interest on federally-exempt bonds issued outside Kentucky while exempting its own municipal bonds from taxation. In this installment we evaluate skeptically a number of possible state interests that might be offered to justify that practice. For example, we point out that Kentucky's assertion that the policy conserves state revenue is wrong. We also argue that, if the goal is to transfer revenues from the state to local governments, then exemption is inferior to direct grants.

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2007/09/yale-galle-on-c.html

Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef00e54edef9188833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yale & Galle on Can Discriminatory State Taxation of Municipal Bonds Be Justified?:

Comments